print

Turkey, Russia and Europe from the Perspective of “Civilizational Realism”

Mezhuyev B.V.,

Associate Professor, Department of the History of Russian Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, borismezhuev@yandex.ru

elibrary_id: 251135 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.06.05

Rubric: Theme of the Issue: Europe, New Times, Old Problems

For citation:

Mezhuyev B.V. Turkey, Russia and Europe from the Perspective of “Civilizational Realism”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.05

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “Expert Institute for Social Research” within the framework of the scientific project No. 19-011-31332 “Morphological Approach to the Study of Modern Geopolitical Processes: Critical Development of the Stein Rokkan’s Conceptual Map, Vadim Tsymbursky’s Model, and Concepts of the Baltic-Black Sea and the Great Mediterranean Regions.

Abstract

The article analyzes Russian-Turkish relations from the 18th century until the 21st century on the basis of Vadim Tsymbursky’s civilizational conception. The author notes that one of the ways of possibly developing this theory could be to analyse the role of Turkey in the European conflict system and the system of the Large Mediterranean. We put forward the hypothesis that the function of the Ottoman Empire in the European system had many similarities with that Russia had for the last three centuries – the function of the Eastern balancer in the continental concert of powers. The article reaches the conclusion that one of the factors for improving relations between Russia and Turkey is the “ostracism” of these two countries by the Euro-Atlantic civilization which has become its “political line”. Consequently, the rise of civilizational self-conscience, both by Russia and Turkey, should be recognized as, in many aspects, a result of “pupation” of Euro-Atlantic community.

Keywords

Turkey, Mediterranean conflict system, the civilizational realism, Eastern balancer.

 Full Text

Temperley H. 1936. England and the Near East. The Crimea. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

Zarakol A. 2011. After Defeat. How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Avatkov V.A. 2014. Neo-Ottomanism. The Basic Ideology and Geostrategy of Turkey. – Svobodnaya mysl’. No. 3. P. 71-78. (In Russ.)

Brzezinski Z. 2012. Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power (Russ. ed. Brzezinski Z. Strategicheskii vzglyad. Amerika i global’nyi krizis. Moscow: Astrel. 288 p.).

Gromyko Yu.V. 2015. Ideology as a Disciplinary Exercise. Tsymbursky is a Humanitarian Scholar- Prophet. – Essays on Conservatism. No. 1. P. 180-187. (In Russ.)

Mezhuyev B.V. 1999. The Modelling of the Notion: National Interest (With Russia’s Far Eastern Policy of the Late 19th to Early 20th Century as Example). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 1. P. 26-39. (In Russ.)

Mezhuyev B.V. 2012. Politicheskaya kritika Vadima Tsymburskogo [Political Criticism of Vadim Tsymbursky]. Moscow: Europa. 160 p. (In Russ.)

Mezhuyev B.V. 2017. “Island Russia” and the Russian Identity Policy. – Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 116-129. (In Russ.) URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/Ostrov-Rossiya-i-rossiiskaya-politika-identichnosti-18657 (accessed 12.09.2019).

Nadein-Raevskiy V.A. 2017. R.T. Erdogan as an Example of a Charismatic Politician. – Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 10. No. 6. P. 138-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-6-138-154

Sargsyan S. 2012. Evolution of the Turkish Army in the Context of Political Changes in the Country. – 21-St Century. No. 5. P. 53-80. (In Russ.)

Schimmelpenninck van der Oye D. 2009. Toward the Rising Sun. Russian Ideologies of Empire and The Path to War With Japan (Russ. ed.: Schimmelpenninck van der Oye D. Navstrechu Voskhodyashchemu solntsu: Kak imperskoe mifotvorchestvo privelo Rossiyu k voine s Yaponiei. Moscow: New Literary Observer. 424 p.).

Taki V. 2017. Tsar’ i Sultan. Osmanskaya imperiya glazami rossiyan [Tsar and Sultan. Russian Encounters with the Ottoman Empire]. Moscow: New Literary Observer. 320 p. (In Russ.)

Tsymbursky V.L. 2007. Ostrov Rossiya. Geopoliticheskie i k hronopoliticheskie raboty. 1993-2006 [Island Russia. Geopolitical and Chronopolitical Works. 1993-2006]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publishers. 544 p. (In Russ.)

Tzymbursky V.L. 2011. Vvedenie. Speak, memory! [Introduction. Speak, memory!]. – Tzymbursky V.L. Kon”yunktury zemli i vremeni. Geopoliticheskie i khronopoliticheskie intellektual’nye rassledovaniya [The Conjuncture of the Earth and Time. Geopolitical and Chronopolitical Intellectual Investigations]. Moscow: Europa. P. 7-24. (In Russ.)

Tsymbursky V.L. 2016. Morfologiya rossiiskoi geopolitiki i dinamika mezhdunarodnykh sistem XVIII-XX vekov [Morphology of Russian Geopolitics and the Dynamics of International Systems of the XVIII-XX Centuries]. Moscow: Knizhnyi Mir Publ. 496 p. (In Russ.)

See also: