P.A.Stolypin as Statesman
Rubric: INTERPRETATIONS
For citation:
Novikova L.I. P.A.Stolypin as Statesman . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 4
Abstract
The author views P.A.Stolypin as a new-type politician who had to work at one and the same time both with the autocratic power and with the Duma endowed with legislative powers. Unlike Speransky and Vitte, L.I.Novikova stresses, it was not from the “roof” that P.A.Stolypin began to construct the new building of Russia’s statehood - not by declaring liberal freedoms, but from below, by taking care of the most numerous and destitute estate of Russia, the peasantry. He subordinated the work of al the ministries to a single general plan, overcoming the resistance of very influential persons, among them the tzar’s closest relatives. Politically, the author maintains, P.A.Stolypin’s main desert is that he accustomed Russian public to a parliamentary, Duma-based style of state management.
Content No. 4, 2001
See also:
Melville A.Yu.,
On Trajectories of Post-Communist Transformations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No2
Vorozheykina T.Ye.,
State and Society in Russia: the State-Centric Development Mould Exhausted. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No4
Bube M.,
The Role of Parties in the Formation of Political System of Post-War Germany. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1
Nechayev V.D.,
The Voter: a Buyer, a Vendor, or a Depositor?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6