Global Conflict of the 21st Century (Reflections on the Sources and Prospects of Inter-Civilizational Contradictions)
Inozemtzev V.L.,
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Director of Center for Postindustrial Studies, Head of the Department of World Economy, Faculty of Public Governance, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, slava_in@yahoo.com
Kuznetzova Ye.S.
Rubric: ORBIS TERRARUM
For citation:
Inozemtzev V.L., Kuznetzova Ye.S. Global Conflict of the 21st Century (Reflections on the Sources and Prospects of Inter-Civilizational Contradictions) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 6
Abstract
The authors develop a critical assessment of the globalization conception. In their opinion, the modern world is not a globalizing one and the only global problem that exists in our time is interaction between the «first world» and any other «worlds» in succession. Basic values of the European civilization are characterized in the article, first of all individualism. The conclusion is made that «globalization», i.e. the mighty intervention of the Western world on a planetary scale, is unable to lead within visible future to the establishment of anything like the Western democratic regimes, in the countries of the periphery. Further expansion of the Western world on the lines of the past decades can result just in its weakening both without and within the bounds of industrial civilization.
Content No. 6, 2001
See also:
Palmowski T., Fedorov G.M.,
Russian-Polish Borderland: Problems and Prospects for the Development of Cross-Border Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2
Zamyatin D.N.,
Geopolitics: Major Problems and Results of Development in the 20th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6
Safonov M.V.,
Modern Approaches to the Study of International Institutions (With Studies of the “Big Eight” as Instance). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3
Sakwa R.,
Back to the Wall: Myths and Mistakes that Made the Ukraine Crisis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4
Korotayev A.V., Bilyuga S.E., Shishkina A.R.,
Correlation between GDP per Capita and Protest Intensity: a Quantitative Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2