“Russian Project in a Global Context” (Development Ideology and the Problem of Making It Active in Politics

“Russian Project in a Global Context” (Development Ideology and the Problem of Making It Active in Politics


Ratz M.V.,

Professor, Expert, Non-Profit Research Foundation «The Schedrovitsky Institute for Development» Moscow, Russia, ratzm@netvision.net.il



For citation:

Ratz M.V. “Russian Project in a Global Context” (Development Ideology and the Problem of Making It Active in Politics . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 6



Abstract
"Fundamental ideas about our thinking and activity, about our world and ourselves, that seemed unshakable under stable conditions, prove untenable and require cardinal revision in the new socio-cultural situation. This pertains both to the changes in Russia and to the processes of globalization that have become the background for the changes. Contrary to the classical methodology that envisages the choice of a unique true viewpoint, nowadays representatives of each position are entitled for an approach of their own and for «their own truth». We have no external standard of truth, but only mutual perspectives in the plurality of opinions or positions out of which we can opt. So, the way is opened for multiplication, diversification of positions. Proceeding from these methodological ideas and claming only to represent one of such positions, the author substantiates necessity and possibility of working out and realization of such a version of «Russian project in a global context» (the theme of a round table organized by the «Nezavisimaya gazeta» in spring this year), that would organically combine both the values of «state-mindedness» and liberal values (which, basically, far from contradicting each other, rather presuppose each other). Besides a detailed analytical review of the said round table and some other materials, mainly from the mentioned newspaper, the author presents some basic elements of his version of a liberal-patriotic project that should rely in socio-political practice on «development ideology», on the ideal of especial «development politics»

Content No. 6, 2001

See also:


Borisova N.V.,
Research optics and methodological perspectives of contemporary ethnopoliitical science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No1

Kulpin-Gubaydullin E.S.,
Thinking of A.S. Akhiyezer. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Mitrofanova A.V.,
Labyrinths and Enigmas of Theocracy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No1

Yurchenko V.M.,
The South of Russia as the Object of Complex Socio-Political Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No5

Fedorovsky A.N.,
Common history and different destinies of the two Korean states. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5

 
 

Archive

   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991