The Presidency Institution in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe as Indicator of the Process of Political Transformation

The Presidency Institution in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe as Indicator of the Process of Political Transformation




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.02.11
Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Kynev A.V. The Presidency Institution in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe as Indicator of the Process of Political Transformation . – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2002.02.11



Abstract

The article suggests and substantiates an original typology of presidential systems now existing in the world; they are differentiated according to seven criteria: (1) composition of the electorate; (2) method of election; (3) combining/dividing the posts of the head of state and of the head of government; (4) mechanism of government formation; (5) existence/absence of the president's right to dissolve parliament; (6) existence/absence of restrictions for reelection; (7) order of filing the presidential post. On analyzing from the angle of these criteria the presidency institution in former socialist countries, the author comes to the conclusion that in most states of Central and Eastern Europe an especial type of presidential system has formed, representing an intermediary variant between the French and the soft parliamentary models. The author's analysis demonstrates that in the absence of direct external pressure, the formation of a peculiar semipresidential system in a post-authoritarian European country with medium level of development and with republican form of government is but a natural result of peaceful political transformation.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 2, 2002

See also:


Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4

Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4

Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2002


Merkel B., Croissant A.
Formal and Informal Institutions in Defective Democracies (1)

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991