Socio-Cultural Frameworks of Institutionalization of Political Practices and Types of Societal Development (I)

Socio-Cultural Frameworks of Institutionalization of Political Practices and Types of Societal Development (I)


Koktysh K.E.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Associate Professor, Department of Political Theory, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, kirill.koktysh@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 250721 | ORCID: 0000-0002-6555-0391 | RESEARCHER_ID: ABF-5548-2021


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.04.02

For citation:

Koktysh K.E. Socio-Cultural Frameworks of Institutionalization of Political Practices and Types of Societal Development (I) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2002.04.02



Abstract

It is formal - institutional - frameworks of overcoming a value crisis coming with marginalization, i.e. with the loss by a social object of its agency, that constitute the subject of the article. For all their variety, political institutions existing in society boil down to two types going back to the symbolic authoritative figures of a chieftain (prototype of executive power) and of a shaman (prototype of normative power), the author notes, and distinguishes (by the criterion of primacy, i.e. of legitimate domination within the available political framework) four possible types of political architecture, or, of framework identity, that regulates the dynamics of social processes: (1) the symbolic figure of a "chieftain" is primary as related to the figure of a "shaman"; (2) the symbolic figure of a "shaman" is primary as related to the figure of a "chieftain"; (3) domination of one or of the other of the two figures is determined situationally, being occasioned by a given combination of factors; (4) these figures do not interact and are joined exclusively by common social environment. The now published first part of the article analyzes in detail the first, "catholic" type of political archetecture. It is characterized, according to the author's conclusion, by stability, given the environment is balanced, and by complications in case of need to get adapted to any changes which ever prove fraught with delegitimation of the prevailing order of things.

 
(электронная версия)

Content No. 4, 2002

See also:


Sorokin K.E.,
Russia and the Play of Geopolitical Interests in the Great Ocean Area. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No4

Barsukova S.Yu.,
Problems of Refugees and Emergency Migrants in the Mirror of Ideologies. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No5

Pastukhov V.B.,
From Statehood to the State: Europe and Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2

Laslo E. ,
Birth of a World - Birth of a Science - Birth of an Age. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Pshizova S.N.,
Democracy and Political Market in a Comparative Perspective (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2010


Alekseyeva T.A.
Reflections on modern world politics

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991