Human Dimension of Federalism (Federalist Theories and Tendencies of the Federative Relations’ Development in Russia)

Human Dimension of Federalism (Federalist Theories and Tendencies of the Federative Relations’ Development in Russia)


Mironyuk M.G.,

Cand. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, HSE University,, mmironyuk@hse.ru


elibrary_id: 251177 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8183-3084 | RESEARCHER_ID: K-9102-2015


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.03.10

For citation:

Mironyuk M.G. Human Dimension of Federalism (Federalist Theories and Tendencies of the Federative Relations’ Development in Russia) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.03.10



Abstract

Appealing to classical and modern theories of federalism, the author substantiates the topicality of approaching federal arrangement as a type of social, societal arrangement. Complex correlations of federalism and democracy, of federalism and liberty are discussed. Particular attention is given to the influence of political culture on the institutions of federalism. Guided by theoretical considerations cited in the article, its author attempts to clear up post-Yeltsin tendencies in the development of the Russian federative model. The conclusion is made that the Putin regime avoids radical transformations in the federative arrangement, bewaring of the destabilizing risk of innovations.

 

 

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 3, 2003

See also:


Kovalev V.A., Shabayev Yu.P.,
Ethnicity and Fellow-Citizenship (Ethno-National Movements in Finno-Ugrian Regions of the Russian Federation). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Ashikhmina Ya.G., Panov P.V., Podvintzev O.B.,
On Criteria of Elections Estimation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Streltzina M.M.,
Institutional Conditions of Setting Up Governmental Departments in Russia and in the USA (With Russia’s Emergency Situations Ministry and the U.S. Homeland Security Department as Example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

Khlopin A.D.,
Deformalization of Rules: Cause or Consequence of Institutional Traps?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Panov P.V.,
Alteration of Electoral Institutions in Russia (Cross-Regional Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2002


Malov V.
Russian Reforms and the USA: Who Is to Blame and What Is to Be Done?

 The article text (Электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991