Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?

Russian Choice:
from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.01.11
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Rogozhina K.A. Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious? – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.01.11



Abstract

The present-time crisis condition of Russian democracy need not be a pretext for appeals to a new “revolutionary leap” to the restoration of a paternalistic-trusteeship socio-political system, the author maintains. She inquires into the reasons of the nostalgia among a part of society for such a system. In the course of her developing further the reasoning contained in R.Dahl’s “Democracy and Its Enemies”, K.A.Rogozhina points out to hopelessness of “trusteeship” in all its forms, arguing in favour of the need to create, “step by step”, an actually democratic model of society in post-communist Russia.


Content No. 1, 2004

See also:


Oganisyan Yu.S.,
Phenomenon of Totalitarianism: Exit to the Twenty-First Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2

Shaptalov B.N.,
Russia’s Choice in the Light of “Classic Democracy”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Yanov A.L.,
Slavophiles and Foreign Politics of Russia in the 19th Century.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Melville A.Yu.,
So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991