Political Discourse of Mediacracies:
Problems of the Information Epoch
Solovyov A.I.,
Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., Head of Political Analysis Department, Faculty of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia, solovyev@spa.msu.ru
elibrary_id: 75920 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.12
Solovyov A.I. Political Discourse of Mediacracies: Problems of the Information Epoch . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.02.12
Inquiring into modern political practices in the context of the information epoch setting in, the author introduces the concept of mediacracy as a particular mode of power organization conducive to the turning of informational relations into a key mechanism of determining the format of political dimensions and of securing interaction between the power and society, and analyzes specific features of the Russian version of mediacratic usages. According to his conclusion, Russian mediacracy has a protodemocratic character. At the same time, the expanding interaction with postdemocratic-type mediacracies has already caused, as is demonstrated in the article, most intensive inner “fermentation” of Russian political culture, which may in due course turn it from the most routine into the most efficient component of political development. Further advancement along this way, as the author supposes, holds real historical prospects in store for our country, and may rid future generations of Russians of facing the danger of finding themselves in a “fourth world”.
See also:
Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4
Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
Demetradze M.R.,
Politico-legal Aspects of Civil Disobedience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No4
Ushakin S.A.,
Being Intellectual as Functional Status. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1