Political Myths of the Far East

Political Myths of the Far East




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.05.04

For citation:

Blyakher L.Ye. Political Myths of the Far East . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.05.04



Abstract

Proceeding from the interpretation of political myth as collective knowledge apt to organize communication, which provides compatibility of group members’ “cognitive horizons” and determines the parameters for delimiting “our” from “alien” dimensions, the author analyzes the most meaningful political mythologems and sense complexes bound up with them, peculiar to the population of the Far East. In his judgment, in consequence of the destruction of the “flowing” culture traditional for the Far East, the only myth now shared by most Far Easterners is the myth of Chinese threat. This myth — in combination with the “resentment” borne against Moscow which has “forsaken” the region — not so much consolidates the population of the region as feeds the urge to break away from it. To reverse the process of degradation of social culture of the territory, the author maintains, creation of a new myth, to be instilled in Far Easterners’ consciousness, is required. In this respect, in his opinion, a positive effect might arise from substituting the image of a “trading station” to the disintegrated image of an “outpost”.


Content No. 5, 2004

See also:


Levkov S.A.,
Khabarovsk Krai: Paradoxes of the Municipal Reform. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Yarulin I.F.,
Political Science in Russian Far East: Condition and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Shinkovsky M.Yu.,
Trans-border Cooperation as a Lever to Be Applied for the Development of Russian Far East. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Nikolayev A.I., Mitrokhin S.S., Glaz’yev S.Yu., Yakovenko I.G., Plyays Ya.A., Gradirovsky S.N., Baranov S.D., Klimov I.A., Musikhin G.I., Zamyatin D.N., Klimenko Z.V., Lapkin V.V., Okara A.N., Mezhuyev B.V.
National vs State Interest: Theoretical Concepts and Political Reality. A Round Table and Fragments of the Discussion.. – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No1

Gallarotti G.M.,
How to Measure Soft Power in International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No1

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2002


Kovalev V.A.
Post-Authoritarian Syndrome in a Region (Experience of Komi Republic in the Context of the “Putin Federalism”)

 
(электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991