The Space of the Ideological Discourse of Post-Soviet Buryatia
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.02.05
Amogolonova D.D., Skrynnikova T.D. The Space of the Ideological Discourse of Post-Soviet Buryatia . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.02.05
The article contains analysis of the spatial-temporal components of the ideological discourse of contemporary Buryatia. The authors demonstrate that the spatial and temporal ideologemes of the Buryat political discourse operate with the whole complex of ethnic characteristics (territory, language, religion). At that, the spatial and the temporal models are not separated from one another, but coexist in the unity of the postulated estimations: “within the limits — out of the limits”, “formerly — nowadays”. Speculatively affirming and legitimating the current confines of the ethnos, the spatial ideologemes are directly related with the history of the Mongols and with the civilizing impact of Buddhism, which, taken together, allow the bounds of the Buryats’ cultural affiliation to be expanded as to embrace the Central Asian region as a whole. At the same time, according to the authors’ conclusion, substantial implication of the discourse is not reduced to ethnic features and peculiarities proper
See also:
Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4
Klemeshev A.P., Ilyin M.V.,
Lost in Translation. Being the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5
Kuchinov A.M.,
Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science: Classification Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5