Geographical Ideas of the Parties in the Process of Settling Ethno-Political Conflicts in the Commonwealth of Independent States
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.02.07
Rasskazov S.V. Geographical Ideas of the Parties in the Process of Settling Ethno-Political Conflicts in the Commonwealth of Independent States . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.02.07
The article presents a review of geographical ideas of those engaged in major ethno-political conflicts on the post-Soviet expanse: the Transdniestrian, the Abkhazian, the South-Ossetic, the Karabakh and the Tajik ones. On distinguishing the “European” group of conflicts, the author demonstrates that most of them are underlain not so much by ethnic, as by center/peripheral contradictions determined by a combination of socio- and politico-cultural, economic, religious and other factors. The only exception is the Karabakh conflict in which the struggle between the center and a region (Azerbaijan and Nagorny Karabakh) occasions participation of another center ethnically similar to the latter (i.e. of Armenia). Specificity of the only “non-European” conflict (the Tajik one) the author relates to its regional-clannish character.
See also:
Shvyrkov A.I.,
Theory, Discourse and Political Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5
Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4
Chikharev I.A.,
The Great Mediterranean as a Multi-Dimensional Object of Political Research. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No3
Kapustin B.G.,
Theses on political philosophy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2