Reform of Regional Electoral Systems and the Development of Political Parties in Russia’s Regions (Cross-Regional Comparative Analysis)
Panov P.V.,
Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Leading Researcher, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, panov.petr@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 77223 | ORCID: 0000-0002-0759-7618 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-2160-2016
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.05.09
Panov P.V. Reform of Regional Electoral Systems and the Development of Political Parties in Russia’s Regions (Cross-Regional Comparative Analysis) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.05.09
The article presents analysis of the influence of the 2003 electoral reform on the development of political parties in Russia’s regions. The comparative investigation realized by the author has demonstrated that the transition to the mixed electoral system at the elections to regional parliaments noticeably modified regional political actors’ strategies and gave a powerful impetus to parties’ development. It has turned out in the meantime, that it is not by regional specificity of electoral institutions that cross-regional variations in parties’ development are conditioned, but first of all by arrangement of forces on a regional political arena, and, apropos, it is not competitive, but “authoritarian” regional regimes that favour a higher level of parties’ development. According to the author’s conclusion, active party construction intensifies “vectorial differentiation” of regional political processes: authoritarian regions grow still more authoritarian, and competitive ones – still more competitive.
See also:
Kolmogorova D.M.,
Russia’s and Germany’s Experience of Consolidating Regions: Publications on the Subject. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5
Vasilenko Yu.V.,
An Essay of Typology of Spanish Conservatism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5
Koval Ye.I., Nazukina M.V.,
From the Monarchist Idea to the Conservative One: F.R.Chвteaubriand and the Development of Russian Political Thought in the First Half of the 19th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5
Kiryanov I.K.,
Failure of the Premiere of a Liberal Play: First Essay of Russian Transit. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5
Titov K.V.,
“Contrat social” а la Khrushchev (The Report “On Personality Cult and Its Consequences” as Supreme Power’s Contract with Nomenclature). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5