Social Geography of Xenophobia and Tolerance
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.06.04
Bavin P.S. Social Geography of Xenophobia and Tolerance . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.06.04
The motif of the article is to analyze the way the problem of other nationals' migration is perceived by the Russian average man - one who in most cases does not possess expert knowledge on this issue and is guided in his judgments by his personal experience and by facts and appraisals borrowed from mass media. On considering the distribution of the answers within a block of questions on the theme of xenophobia asked in the Public Opinion Foundation's megapoll carried out in May, 2006, the author subdivides Russians into four groups: (1) the tolerant (respondents who claim to feel, on their part, no national hostility and who do not support the authorities' actions directed against migrants); (2) those standing on guard (who come out in favour of restricting the inflow of other-national migrants into the region, but do not strive for moving away those already arrived, and do not feel hostility towards them; (3) the ethnopurists (who approve any measures conducive to delivering the region from other-national migrants, but who claim no hostility towards them); (4) the xenophobes (who make no secret of their hostility towards persons of other nationality, and approve any actions against them on the part of the authorities) - and researches the influence of socio-demographic and geographical (regional) factors on the level of xenophobia in the country.
See also:
Kertman G.L.,
Moscow Anomalies: an Excursion through the “Georating”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No6
Oslon A.A.,
Megapolls for Russia’s Population (The “Georating” Project). – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No6
Rzheshevsky G.A.,
Democracy: Myth, Reality, or Boosted Brand?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No5
DOSSIER: SOCIAL PROTECTION. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No6
Orbis terrarum. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2