Semantic Analysis of the “Subordination” Concept in the Field of the Opposition of the Private and the Public
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.01.05
Kostryukova O.N., Osipov G.R., Sarenkov A.A. Semantic Analysis of the “Subordination” Concept in the Field of the Opposition of the Private and the Public . – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.01.05
The motif of the article is analysis of the “subordination” concept in different language and socio-political contexts. Regarding the concept, as well as the typology of subordination, based on it, as indicators for distinguishing private and public spaces, the authors demonstrate that, as distinct from European polities where this opposition stands out clearly enough, in the Russian polity it is constantly destroyed. They see the source of such state of things in the claim – traditional for Russia – laid by the state, to embracing the whole of social space. The present tendency to reducing public relations to private ones and to merging the two kinds of subordination is interpreted by the authors as historical revenge on the part of privacy which, by way of taking vengeance for the centuries of its being humiliated, is today seizing ever new spheres of public political space.
See also:
Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
Rusakova O.F., Maksimov D.A.,
Political Discoursology: Subject Field, Theoretical Approaches, and a Structural Model of Political Discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4
Rasskazov S.V.,
Geographical Ideas of the Parties in the Process of Settling Ethno-Political Conflicts in the Commonwealth of Independent States. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No2
Klemeshev A.P., Ilyin M.V.,
Lost in Translation. Being the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5