Adjectives of Sovereignty. Sovereignty as an Adjective
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.03.09
Reut O.Ch. Adjectives of Sovereignty. Sovereignty as an Adjective . – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.03.09
The article considers Russian discourse of sovereignization. The necessity to approach to the understanding of questions of expediency and possibility to retain or reduce state sovereignty is regarded as one of urgent tasks confronting the Russian political class and the country’s community of researchers in the field of political science. Processes of sovereignization and desovereignization are the object of research in the article, and the subject of analysis is constituted by discursive strategies determining modern mind’s “reading” of the concept of sovereignty. The whole complex of discursive strategies is regarded as a discursive practice.
See also:
Gavrilova M.V.,
Modernization of Russian Political Discourse in the Aspect of Meanings Read into Notions (With the Explication of the Concept “State” as an Example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No3
Pavlov A.V., Sidorkin S.A.,
“The Simpsons” as Phenomenon of Ideology and Policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No5
Nikiforov A.A.,
Revolution as Subject of Theoretical Treatment: the Sub-Discipline’s Progress and Dilemmas. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No5
Alekseyenkova Ye.S., Sergeev V.M.,
The Dark Well of Power (on the Boundary between the Private Sphere of the State and the Person’s Private Sphere). – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No3
Arshin K.V.,
Influence of Economic, Political, and Cultural Factors on the Processes of Formation of Nations in Modern Times Europe.. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No1