Social Inequality in the Mirror of Public Policy

Social Inequality in the Mirror of Public Policy


Semenenko I.S.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia , semenenko@imemo.ru


elibrary_id: 251670 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2529-9283 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.05.15

For citation:

Semenenko I.S. Social Inequality in the Mirror of Public Policy . – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.05.15



Abstract

The work is a review of the book by a well-known British political scientist and historian Archie Brown «Seven Years That Changed the World» issued lately by the Oxford University Press and having for its subject analysis of the political history of the USSR of 1985 to 1991. According to Brown’s conception, the perestroika began as a reform, but shaped as systemic transformation, for it led to the change of all the key characteristics of the communist system. The main question the author of the book is concerned with is how did changes turn out possible in an extremely authoritarian system whose existence had lasted for about 70 years and which had more than once stood the trial of its durability? How did it happen that it proved at all possible to begin them - one would think, in defiance of «theory»? He sees the main reason that induced the beginning of the changes, in the «subjective factor», for in consolidated authoritarian systems, peaceful transformation can be started up only «from above». Therefore A.Brown’s attention is concentrated mainly on the activities of M.S.Gorbachev and other members of the top party leadership. At the same time he attaches great significance to the appearance in the power structures, as well as in expert institutions that assisted the party leadership, of people disposed in favour of changes.


Content No. 5, 2007

See also:


Borisova N.V.,
Research optics and methodological perspectives of contemporary ethnopoliitical science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No1

Kulpin-Gubaydullin E.S.,
Thinking of A.S. Akhiyezer. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Mitrofanova A.V.,
Labyrinths and Enigmas of Theocracy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No1

Pantin I.K.,
Democratic Project in the Modern World. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No1

Yurchenko V.M.,
The South of Russia as the Object of Complex Socio-Political Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No5

 
 

Archive

   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991