Stability of political system: homo communicativus vs homo politicus

Stability of political system:
homo communicativus vs homo politicus




For citation:

Shevchenko A.V. Stability of political system: homo communicativus vs homo politicus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No. 5



Abstract

The author is considering political space – from the point of view of communicative processes – as an aggregate of homoeosynergetic systems and analyzes “homo communicativus” as the dominant actor of modern political relations, in which it is exchange of information (metabolism) that becomes the individual’s main requirement.


Content No. 5, 2009

See also:


Solovyov A.I.,
A sketch by a master: political system of post-soviet Russia in Sergey Peregudov’s version. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

Kochetkov A.P.,
Authority and elites in a global information society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Moiseyev N.N.,
Information Society: Possibilities and Realities. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No3

Bezvikonnaya Ye.V.,
Systemico-Synergetic Model of a Political System. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Shestopal Ye.B.,
Introducing the section. The human dimension of politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No6

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2012


Neklessa A.I.
Northern Romea. Spaces of complex dialogue

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991