.jpg)
printSubjectivist entitativity of regional analytical communities:
criteria, stages of formation, and conditions (with Republic of Karelia as an example)
For citation:
Sukhorukov A.S. Subjectivist entitativity of regional analytical communities: criteria, stages of formation, and conditions (with Republic of Karelia as an example) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No. 3
Abstract
Descriptions of the cases, as well as characteristics of the results, of regional analytical communities’ participation in the adoption of decisions by the organs of the state- and of municipal authority, with Republic of Karelia as example, are brought in the article. The task of upgrowth of analytical communities’ subjectivist entitativity is exposed, and problems and challenges standing out in connection with that, are especially marked.
Content No. 3, 2011
See also:
Sungurov A.Yu.,
Expert community, think tanks and power: experience of three regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2
Yakovlev I.G.,
Information-Analytical Technologies and Political Consulting (1). – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No2
Yakovlev I.G.,
Information-Analytical Technologies and Political Consulting (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No3
Samarkina I.V., Bashmakov I.S., Kolozov D.P., Kuzmenko N.P.,
The future image as a component of political subjective space: testing the conceptual model. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No5
Shumavan N.,
Russian Parliamentarism as Reflected in Analytical Papers of the FDPR. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No6
.jpg)
.jpg)