Right of Nations to Self-Determination: Evolution of Concept and Practices

Right of Nations to Self-Determination:
Evolution of Concept and Practices


Troitskaya O.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Senior Researcher, Center for Research on Russian Military and Political Challenges, Institute of Socio-Political Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, olgatroitskaya1@gmail.com



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.06.12

For citation:

Troitskaya O.V. Right of Nations to Self-Determination: Evolution of Concept and Practices. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.06.12



Abstract

The article investigates evolution of the right of nations to self-determination in the political ideologies of Russia, U.S. and European countries in the XVIII – XX centuries. It explores the role ofgreat powers in formulation and implementation of international norms of self-determination. Finally, itanalyzes national approaches towards resolution of self-determination conflicts in the XXI century. Theauthor comes to conclusion that divergent interpretations of the right of nations to self-determination incontemporary policies of these countries are rooted in their political сculture. The U.S. and EuropeanUnion countries endorse the liberal concept of self-determination which defines nation as a civic society,and the right to self-determination as a legitimate right of citizens to establish such political regime thatprotects their rights and freedoms. The Western countries nowadays maintain their support of protestactions against authoritarian regimes in favor of liberal-democratic ones. Russia upholds a differentconcept of self-determination, defining nation as a multiethnic society which combines integrity of thestate with ethnocultural diversity of the peoples comprising it. Self-determination of such nation can berealized by a democratic choice of any political regime which preserves and promotes its cultural and civilizational specifics. 

Keywords
right of nations to self-determination; conflict; international law; U.S.; France; Great Britain; Russia; liberalism; civic nationalism; ethnic nationalism.


Content No. 6, 2015

See also:


Klemeshev A.P., Vorozheina Ya.A.,
National-Conservative “Turn” of Poland in Geopolitical Context. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No5

Farukshin M.Kh.,
Institutional Foundations of Ethnic Federations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2

Prokhorenko I.L.,
Possibilities of Spatial Approach in Analysis of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6

Pastukhov V.B.,
The demon of law. Russian law as escaping reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Martyanov V.S.,
The good intentions of federalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2010


Gao Shu Qin, Jia Qing Go
Rebuilding the relations after the end of the cold war

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991