Nation vs Empire in the Modern World Order
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.04.04
Abstract
The article explores the causes and possible consequences of the critical instability of the modern world order, and the emerging fundamental institutional transformation arising from the search for ways to overcome this crisis of the modern world system. The analysis focuses on the of theoretical and methodological basis for a deeper understanding of the nature of this crisis and the identification of “points of growth” for new forms of interaction between the main subjects of world development, as well as new, more differentiated principles of global universalism, more sensitive to the cultural diversity of communities integrated into the global system of communities and of their political actors. The author discusses the phenomenon of “new powers”, the complicated and symbiotic nature of their political organization, including transboundary formats for the distribution of control impulses, as well as their participation in the formation of new patterns of the world order. This analysis contributes to the formulation of a hypothesis about the essence (content) of a new system of international relations and territorial division of the world. Its essence: the exhaustion of the stability potential of the international system of national-territorial states gave rise in the course of historical development to irreversible dysfunction – a unipolar world order (the “lone superpower” syndrome). Overcoming this dysfunction is the main point on global transformation agenda in all its aspects: political, socio-economic, cultural, etc. Researchers studying these processes may have to reconsider the traditional optics of analysis, its conceptual bases and paradigmatic approaches in a critical manner.
Keywords
transformation of the world order; subjects of world development; nation-state; nationalism; civilization; world-system; unipolarity; empire; universalism; political space; global dominance; methodological nationalism; cosmopolitan perspective; sovereignty.
ReferencesAlekseenkova E.S. Chaos and Game without Rules: on Modern Crisis of Trust in Relations Between Russia and the West. – Politeia. 2015. No. 1. P. 67-81. (In Russ.)
Asimmetriya mirovoi sistemy suvereniteta: zony problemnoi gosudarstvennosti. Pod red. M.V. Ilyina, I.V. Kudryashovoj [Asymmetry of the World Sovereignty System: Zones of Troubled Stateness. Ed. by M. Ilyin, I. Kudryashova]. Moscow: MGIMO-University. 2011. 248 p. (In Russ.)
Beck U. Living in and Coping with a Global-Risk Society: The Cosmopolitan Turn. – Vestnik of the Kennan Institute in Russia. 2012. No. 22. P. 57-69. (In Russ.)
Beck U. Living in and Coping With World Risk Society: The Cosmopolitan Turn. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No. 5. P. 44-58. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/en/article/4615 (accessed 15.06.2018).
Braudel F. Civilization matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XVe XVIIIe siécle. Tome 3. Le Temps du Monde. (Russ. ed.: Braudel F. Material’naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV-XVIII vv. T. 3. Vremya mira. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1992. 680 p.)
Braudel F. Grammaire des civilizations. (Russ. ed.: Braudel F. Grammatika tsivilizatsii. Moscow: Ves MIR Publishers. 2014. 560 p.)
Buchanan P.J. The Death of the West: How Doing Populations and Immigrants Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. New York: Thomas Dunne Books. 2002. 311 p.
Foa R.S., Mounk Y. The Danger of Deconsolidation: The Democratic Disconnect. – Journal of Democracy. 2016. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049
Fukuyama F. America in Decay: The Sources of Political Dysfunction. – Foreign Affairs. 2014. Vol. 93. No. 5. P. 5-26.
Haas R.N. The Unraveling: How to Respond to a Disordered World. – Foreign Affairs. 2014. Vol. 93. No. 6. P. 70-79.
Hardt M., Negri A. Empire. (Russ. ed.: Hardt M., Negri A. Imperiya. Moscow: Praxis. 2004. 440 p.)
Hobson Ch. Democratic Peace: Progress and Crisis. – Perspectives on Politics. 2017. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 697-710. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000913
Ilyin M.V. Slova i smysly. Opyt opisaniya klyuchevykh politicheski ponyatii [Words and Meanings. Experience of Description of the Key Political Concepts]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publishers. 1997. 432 p. (In Russ.)
Ilyin M.V. Is the Universal Typology of States Possible? – Political Science (RU). 2008. No. 4. P. 8-41. (In Russ.)
Ilyin M.V. Patrimonium et Imperium: Metamorphoses of Two Prototypical Orders in the Mirror of Evolutionary Morphology (part 1). – POLITEX. Political Expertise Journal. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 5-21. (In Russ.)
Ilyin M.V. Patrimonium et Imperium: Metamorphoses of Two Prototypical Orders in the Mirror of Evolutionary Morphology (part 2). – POLITEX. Political Expertise Journal. 2015. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 5-24. (In Russ.)
Ilyin M.V., Meleshkina Ye.Yu., Melville A.Yu. Formation of the New States: Domestic and External Factors of Consolidation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No. 3. P. 26-39. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/en/article/4277 (accessed 15.06.2018).
Kaspe S.I. Imperiya i modernizatsiya: Obshchaya model’ i rossiiskaya spetsifika [Empire and Modernization: General Model and Russian Specificity]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publishers. 2001. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Lapkin V.V. Politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii v kontekste global’nykh izmenenii: nauchnaya monografiya [Political Modernization of Russia in Global Changes Context]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN. 140 p. (In Russ.)
Lapkin V.V. Sotsial’no-politicheskii kontekst transformatsii identichnosti v XXI veke [Socio-political Contexts of Identity Transformations in the 21st Century]. – Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie. Ed. by I. Semenenko [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia. Ed. by I. Semenenko]. Moscow: Ves MIR Publishers. 2017. 992 p. (In Russ.)
Malakhov V.S. Kul’turnye razlichiya i politicheskie granitsy: natsional’nyi, lokal’nyi i global’nyi konteksty [Cultural Differences and Political Boundaries: National, Local and Global Contexts]. – Malakhov V.S. Kul’turnye razlichiya i politicheskie granitsy v epokhu global’nykh migratsii [Cultural Differences and Political Boundaries in the Era of Global Migration]. Moscow: New Literary Observer publishing house; Institute of Philosophy Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014. P. 11-12. (In Russ.)
Meer van der T.W.G. Political Trust and the “Crisis of Democracy”. – Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77
Melville A.Yu., Stukal D.K., Mironyuk M.G. Trajectories of Regime Transformations and Types of State Consistency. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No. 2. P. 8-30. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/article/4532 (проверено 15.06.2018).
Menon R., Rumer E.B. Conflict in Ukraine: The Unwinding of the Post-Cold War Order. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 2015. 248 p.
Nationalizing Empires. Ed. by S. Berger, A. Miller. Budapest: Central European University Press. 2015. 691 p.
Pain E., Fedyunin S. Natsiya i demokratiya. Perspektivy upravleniya kul’turnym raznoobraziem [The Nation and Democracy. Prospects for Managing Cultural Diversity]. Moscow: Mysl’. 266 p. (In Russ.)
Pantin V.I., Lapkin V.V. Istoricheskoe prognozirovanie v XXI veke: Tsikly Kondrat’eva, evolyutsionnye tsikly i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya [Historical Forecasting in the 21st century: Kondratieff’s Cycles, Evolutionary Cycles and Prospects for World Development]. Dubna: Phoenix-plus. 456 p. (In Russ.)
Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (Russ. ed.: Polanyi K. Velikaya transformatsiya: politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia. 2002. 320 p.)
Reconfiguring European States in Crisis. Ed. by King D., Le Galès P. Oxford; New York: Oxford University press. 2017. 512 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198793373.001.0001
Soros G. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma: Otkrytoe obshchestvo v opasnosti [The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered]. 1999. Moscow: INFRA-M. 262 p.
Straus A.L. Unipolarity (The Concentric Structure of the New World Order and the Position of Russia). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No. 2. P. 27-44. (In Russ.)
Tokarev A.A. Comparative Analysis of the Post-Communist Secessions: The Prognostic Attempt of Quantification of the Factors` Impact on Secession. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 4. P. 106-117 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.04.08
Wallerstein I. Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization. (Russ. ed.: Wallerstein I. Istoricheskii kapitalizm. Kapitalisticheskaya tsivilizatsiya. Moscow: Tovarishchestvo natschnykh izdanii KMK. 2008. 176 p.)
Wallerstein I. The Inventions of TimeSpace Realities: Towards an Understanding of Our Historical Sysrems. (Russ. ed.: Wallerstein I. Izobretenie real‘nostei vremeni-prostranstva: k ponimaniyu nashikh istoricheskikh system. – Vremya mira. Al’manakh. No. 2. Struktury istorii. Ed. by N.S. Rozov. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf. 2001. P. 102-116).
Wilson A. Ukraine Crisis: What it Means for the West. Totton, Hampshire; New Haven; London: Yale University Press. 2014. 248 p.
See also:
Iordansky V.B.,
Contradictory nature of nationalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6 Lapkin V.V.,
Global Interlude: from Unipolar Dysfunction to a New World Order. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No6 Semenenko I.S.,
Nationalism, Separatism, and Democracy. New Patterns of National Identity in “Old” Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No5 Rutland P.,
The presence of absence: ethnicity policy in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2 Naumkin V.V.,
Modern Convergent Arab Nationalism in the Mirror of Historic Memory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No6