Why Innovative Knowledge About Russian Society Is in Such a Demand

S.A. Kravchenko

doi:10.17976/jpps/2018.04.15

Why Innovative Knowledge About Russian Society Is in Such a Demand

Kravchenko S.A.,

Head of Sociology Department, MGIMO-University, sociol7@yandex.ru

elibrary_id: 77019 | RESEARCHER_ID: H-5769-2016

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.04.15

Rubric: Reflecting on Matters in Print

For citation:

Kravchenko S.A. Why Innovative Knowledge About Russian Society Is in Such a Demand. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.15

Abstract

The author of the article shares his reflections on innovative knowledge, inspired by reading a book by M.K. Gorshkov “Russian society in the context of new reality. To the results and continuation of the sociological mega-project” (Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers, 2017) and some other works – his own and his school. As it is shown in the article, many Russian and foreign sociologists consider the main function of sociology to be the diagnosis of society. A special place in this series is the unique theoretical and methodological instruments for the sociological diagnostics proposed by the Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences M.K. Gorshkov that organically combines interdisciplinary and contextual approaches. Its application allowed the investigators to obtain very valid results of Russia’s states in the last quarter of the century, on the basis of which a forecast is given for its future that also takes into account the peculiarities of current global and national realities. In this context, the author of the article proposes to reconsider the development strategy of Russian society, its reorientation to the realization of socio-economic tasks and the achievement of humanistic goals of the development of the society. Accordingly, the new management is demanded including the development and reproduction of social and human capital as the most important socio-humanitarian component on the basis of highly developed spheres of science, culture, and education. The diagnostic instruments identify and justify the means of optimizing the social life of Russians among which are: a socio-humanitarian expertise; conditions for free activity of people; the national variant of the democratic system ensuring the reproduction of social trust of citizens in political institutions; the formation of education as a means of countering the challenges for Russia; the humanization of the economy aimed at increasing of social and human capital. The sociological diagnosis that was carried out made it possible to establish a social diagnosis according to which Russian society has become complex, more differentiated and multilayered with a permanent process of technical and socio-cultural renewal while the Russians formed the awareness of their belonging to the European and Eurasian world.

Keywords

Russia; sociological diagnostics; social and humanitarian expertise; humanistic turn; future.

Full Text

References

Adolf M., Stehr N. Knowledge. Second ed. London and New York: Routledge. 2017. 312 р.

Bauman Z., Donskis L. Liquid Evil. Living with TINA. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2016. 170 р.

Beck U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2016. 223 р.

Dmitriev A.V., Sychev A.A. Provokaciya: Sociofilosofskie ocherki [Provocation: Sociophilosophical essays]. Moscow: CSPIM. 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M.K. Rossijskoe obshchestvo v kontekste novoj real’nosti. K itogam i prodolzheniyu sociologicheskogo megaproekta [Russian Society in the Context of a New Reality. To the Results and Continuation of the Sociological Megaproject]. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2017. 104 p. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M.K. Rossijskoe obshchestvo kak ono est’: (opyt sociologicheskoj diagnostiki) [Russian Society as It Is: (the Experience of Sociological Diagnosis)]. Vol. 1-2. 2nd ed. Moscow: New Chronograph. 2016. 416 p. (In Russ.)

Kravchenko S.A. Sotsiologicheskaya diagnostika riskov, uyazvimostei, doveriya [Sociological Diagnosis of Risks, Vulnerabilities, Trus]. Moscow: MGIMO-University. 2016. 431 p. (In Russ.)

Kravchenko S.A., Salygin V.I. A New Synthesis of Scientific Knowledge: the Formation of Interdisciplinary Science. – Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. No. 10. P. 22-30. (In Russ.)

“Normal’naya anomiya” v Rossii i sovremennom mire [“Normal Anomie” in Russia and the Modern World]. Ed. by S.A. Kravchenko. Moscow: MGIMO-University. 2017. 281 p. (In Russ.)

Perrow Ch. The Next Catastrophe. Reducing Our Vulnarabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2011. 432 р.

Rosa H. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press. 2013. 512 р.

Rossijskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni [Russian Society and the Challenges of Time]. The fifth book. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov, V.V. Petuhov. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2017. 424 p. (In Russ.)

Stolicy i regiony v sovremennoj Rossii: mify i real’nost’ pyatnadcat’ let spustya [Capitals and Regions in Modern Russia: Myths and Reality Fifteen Years Later]. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov, N.E. Tikhonova. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.)

High Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power and Modernity. Ed. by Rosa H., Scheuerman W.E. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 2009. 328 р.

Urry J. What Is Future? Cambridge: Polity Press. 2016. 226 р.

Wieviorka M. Europe Facing Evil: Xenophobia, Racism, Anti-Semitism and Terrorism. – Europe’s Crises. Ed. by M. Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2017. P. 205-223.

Content No. 4, 2018