Symbols and Values in International Relations in the Middle East

I.D. Zvyagelskaya

doi:10.17976/jpps/2019.01.08

Symbols and Values in International Relations in the Middle East

Zvyagelskaya I.D.,

Head of the Middle East Studies Center, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, zvyagel@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 71360 | ORCID: 0000-0002-5937-9997 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAZ-6716-2020

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.01.08

Rubric: Orbis Terrarum

For citation:

Zvyagelskaya I.D. Symbols and Values in International Relations in the Middle East. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.01.08

Abstract

The article considers the impact of symbols and values on international relations in the Middle East. Symbolic politics has long been regarded as an integral part of domestic politics, but nowadays its translation into the foreign policy is attracting more and more attention. The behavior of the states in the international arena reflects the role played by values and symbols, by historical narrative and status issues. The symbolic content of the foreign policy agenda of the Middle East countries is most obvious. It can be linked to the incomplete processes of nation-building and to the remaining fragmentation of local societies, to traditionalism; to systemic conflicts with ethno-confessional dimension. Fear and deep-rooted distrust among the main regional players prevent an adequate assessment of the intentions and capabilities of an opponent, often causing an overreaction to the challenges. In terms of threat perception, an important role can be played by subjective factors closely associated with the tradition, which dictates a certain mode of behavior. A special role in the formation and conduct of foreign policy is played by “politically suitable past”, when the glorification of ancestors is used to require from contemporaries the same dedication and willingness to sacrifice. One of the central political issues remains the question of its value content. Values are translated through symbols and rituals, which secure a symbolic contract between the government and society. More than often a political practice does not correspond to the declared values, especially in the foreign policy. The gap between the lofty goals declared by states and nonstate actors and the methods of their implementation may be impressive. The struggle for justice can be easily combined with an extreme cruelty, and the promotion of democracy with a military invasion. The article marshals a number of examples illustrating the above assumptions.

Keywords

symbols, values, conflicts, international relations, foreign policy behavior, status issues, ethno-confessional factor, traditionalism, identity.

Full Text

References

Burton J. 1990. Conflict: Resolution and Provention. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 295 p.

Edelman M.J. 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action. Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company. 188 р.

Morgan G.W. 2010. Iraqi Claims on Kuwait. – The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars. The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts. Ed. by S.C. Tucker. Santa Barbara, California; Denver, Colorado; Oxford, England: ABC-CLIO, LLC. 599-600 p.

Kaufman S.J. 2014. A Symbolic Politics Theory of War. Paper Prepared for Presentation at ISAC-ISSS Conference Austin. University of Delaware, Texas. 27 р.

Saunders H. 2011. Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts. Transformation and Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. 297 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137011817

Shlaim A. 2000. The Iron Wall. Israel and the Arab World. New York; London: W.W. Norton &Company. 670 p.

Slim R.M. 2011. The Arab-American-European Dialogue: Working Together Toward a New Relationship between the West and the Arab Region (2001-2007). – Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts. Transformation and Change. Ed. by H.H. Saunders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 163-190.

Starr S.F. 2005. A Partnership for Central Asia. – Foreign Affairs. Vol. 84. No. 4. P. 164-178. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2005-07-01/partnership-central-asia (accessed 10.12.2018).

Al-‘Ubaydi M., Lahoud N., Milton D., B. Price. 2014. The Group That Calls Itself a State: Understanding the Evolution and Challenges of the Islamic State. The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. U.S. Military Academy, Department of Defense, or U.S. government. 103 p.

Zerubavel Y. 1995. Recovered Roots. Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. 340 p.

Aganin A.R. 2013. Plemena, klany i semeistva Katara [Aganin A.R. Tribes, Clans and Families of Qatar]. Moscow: Institut Blizhnego Vostoka Publishers. 312 p. (In Russ.)

Dubin B. 2006. Simulative Power and Ceremonial Politics. On the Political Culture of Modern Russia. – Russian Public Opinion Herald. No. 1. P. 14-25. (In Russ.)

Gigauri D.I. 2016. Politicheskii mif i ritual v strukture sovremennoi simvolicheskoi politiki. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk [Gigauri D.I. Political Myth and Ritual in the Structure of Modern Symbolic Politics. Thesis for the Degree of Candidate of Political Sciences]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. 221 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://disser.spbu.ru/files/disser2/disser/mpwn6VysLF.pdf (accessed 10.12.2018).

Istomin I.A. 2018. Logika povedeniya gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnoi politike [Istomin I.A. The Logic of the Behavior of States in International Politics]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 296 c. (In Russ.)

Kosach G.G. 2015. Palestinskii natsionalizm: stanovlenie i evolyutsiya [Palestinian Nationalism: Formation and Evolution]. – Natsii i natsionalizm na musul’manskom Vostoke [Nations and Nationalism in the Muslim East. Ed. by V.Ya. Belokrenitskii, N.Yu. Ul’chenko]. Moscow: The Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences. P. 116-129. (In Russ.)

Malinova O.Yu. 2013. The Problem of a Politically “Fit” Past and the Evolution of Official Symbolic Politics in post-Soviet Russia. – The Political Conceptology: Journal of Metadisciplinary Research. No. 1. P. 114-130. (In Russ.)

Panarin S.A. 1996. Tsentral’naya Aziya: integratsionnyi potentsial i perspektivy migratsii [Central Asia: integration potential and migration prospects]. – Migratsiya russkoyazychnogo naseleniya iz Tsentral’noi Azii: prichiny, posledstviya, perspektivy. Nauchnye doklady. Vyp. 11 [Migration of the Russian-speaking Population from Central Asia: Causes, Consequences, Prospects. Ed. by G. Vitkovskaya. Scientific reports. Issue 11]. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center. P. 11-39. (In Russ.)

Rudenko L.N., Solov’eva Z.A. 2007. Liga arabskikh gosudarstv i integratsionnye protsessy v arabskom mire [Arab League and Integration Processes in the Arab World]. Moscow: Institut Blizhnego Vostoka. 190 p. (In Russ.)

Stepanova N.V. (jointly with Shakhbazyan G.S.) 2008. Irak [Stepanova N.V. Iraq]. – Istoriya Vostoka. V 6 tomakh. Tom 6. Vostok v noveishii period (1945-2000 gg.) [History of the East. In 6 vol. Vol. 6. East in the Newest Period (1945-2000). Ed. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, V.V. Naumkin]. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Vostochnaya Literatura. P. 313-331. (In Russ.)

Content No. 1, 2019