print

Horizons of Responsible Development:
from Discourse to Governance

Semenenko I.S.,

Deputy Director, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, semenenko@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 251670 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2529-9283 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Rubric: We in the World, the World in Us

For citation:

Semenenko I.S. Horizons of Responsible Development: from Discourse to Governance. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Abstract

An overview of the narratives on social development that have appeared in the social sciences at the turn of the millennium demonstrates that the vision of the future that emerges is blurred, and uncertainty, anxiety andinsecurity are perceptions shared by the political class and the public opinion. This said, the research agenda andgovernance priorities are torn apart to the detriment of security, equality and social cohesion. The gap which existsin our perception of the future calls for a new approach to development issues. The author proposes a conceptualframework for promoting social change at different levels of community life based on responsible development.This framework has several dimensions: a moral value oriented motivation for choosing development prioritiesand stimulating individual capabilities, recourse to non-material, intellectual and (where possible) renewableresources to promote this agenda, and an institutional basis for stimulating agency, engaging and empoweringindividuals and communities, and fostering civic political identity. Responsible development is not a universalmodel, nor a set of fixed goals, but a reference frame to pursue development priorities based on a strategic visionof the future and on innovative approaches to governance. These approaches may vary to accommodate theexigencies of different societies and communities, and there can be no one-size-fits-all option due to differencesin political culture, economic development and social frameworks, but they do share common basic principles.Social dialogue on the community level and the capabilities approach which has been adopted within theframework of the Nordic model are an example of effective governance practices which fit into this framework.Responsible development is a strategic vision of the principles that can direct communities and individuals topursue development issues and to hold responsibility for the choices they make, for the policies they promoteand for their long-term effects. As such, it requires a permanent tuning of social and political institutions,consideration of changing priorities, values and identities, and feedback between the research and the educationagendas, between the state, local governments, business and civil society. The social sciences are a crucial actorin this process; promoting this discourse in the public space and engaging the political class is a key priority ofa responsible intellectual community.

Keywords

social studies, forecasting, narratives on development, non-material / intellectual resources, responsible development, motivation of development, subjects / actors of development, individual capabilities, empowerment, dialogue culture, identity politics, civic identity, political action, governance, local communities.

 Full Text  

Bettencourt L.M.A., Kaur J. 2011. Evolution and Structure of Sustainability Science. – PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America). Vol. 108. No. 49. P. 19540-19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108

Boyte H.C. 2004. Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. 264 p. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812204216

British Cultural Studies. Geography, Nationality, and Identity. 2001. Ed. by D. Morley, K. Robbins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 538 p.

Buzan B., Waever O., de Wilde J. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc. 239 p.

Canton J. 2007. The Extreme Future: The Top Trends That Will Reshape the World in the Next 20 Years. New York: The Plume Book. 384 p.

Charron N., Lapuente V. 2018. Quality of Government in EU regions: Spatial and Temporal Patterns. University of Gothenburg. Working Paper Series 2018:2. February. 40 p. URL: https://qog.pol.gu.se/digi­talAssets/1679/1679869_2018_1_charron_lapuente.pdf (accessed 06.03.2019).

Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History (Stuart Hall: Selected Writings). Ed. by J.D. Slack, L. Grossberg). 2016. Durham, London: Duke University Press. 218 p.

Florida R.L. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books. 404 p.

Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press. 418 p.

Fukuyama F. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 240 p.

Huntington S. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster. 368 p.

Subterranean Politics in Europe. 2015. Ed. by M. Kaldor, S. Selchow, T. Murray-Leach. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 242 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441478

Kiiski Kataja E., Laine P., Jousilahti J., Neuvonen A. 2018. The Next Era of Well-Being. Ideals, Visions and Solutions. Helsinki, Sitra. 48 p. URL: https://media.sitra.fi/2018/02/07154905/the-next-era-of-well-being-ideals-vision-and-solutions.pdf (accessed 05.03.2019).

Korhonen S., Neuvonen A., Hokkanen L. 2017. The Nordic model is not about well-being – It is about capabilities. – SITRA articles. May 11. URL: https://www.sitra.fi/en/articles/nordic-model-not-well-capa­bilities/ (accessed 05.03.2019).

Mason P. 2016. PostCapitalism. A Guide to Our Future. London: Penguin Books. 368 p.

Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens III W.W. 1972. The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: A Potomac Associates Book. 205 p.

Measuring the Quality of Government and Subnational Variation. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development. 2010. University of Gothenburg. 161 p. URL: https://nicholascharron.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/final-report-parts-1-3.pdf (accessed 06.03.2019).

Moore J.F. 1993. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. – Harvard Business Review. Vol. 71. No. 3. P. 75-86.

Nussbaum M.C. 2011. Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 256 p.

Nussbaum M.C. 2016. Introduction: Aspirations and the Capabilities List. – Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1200789

Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 704 p. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542

Putnam R.D. (with R. Leonardi, R.Y. Nanetti). 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 247 p.

Ravetz J.R. 1999. What is Post-Normal Science. – Futures. Vol. 31. P. 647-653.

Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 607 p.

Raworth K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing. 320 p.

Saltelli A. 2018. Why Science’s Crisis Should not Become a Political Battling Ground. – Futures. Vol. 104. P. 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.07.006

Saltelli A., Funtowicz S. 2017. What Is Science’s Crisis Really About? – Futures. Vol. 91. P. 5-11. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010

Sen A.R. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 468 p.

Slaughter R.A. 2003. Futures Beyond Dystopia: Creating Social Foresight. London: Routledge. 336 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465158

Streeck W. 2016. How Will Capitalism End?: Essays on a Failing System. London, New York: Verso Books. 272 p.

Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. 2005. Ed. by D. Morley and K.-H. Chen. London, New York: Routledge. 536 p.

Tilly Ch. 2008. Contentious Performances. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. 254 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804366

Tilly Ch., Tarrow S. 2006. Contentious Politics. London: Paradigm Publishers. 260 p.

Toffler A. 1970. Future Shock. New York: Random House. 505 p.

Wallerstein E., Collins R., Mann M., Derluguian G., Calhoun C. 2013. Does Capitalism Have a Future? Oxford, Oxford University Press. 208 р.

Wolff J., de-Shalit A. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 248 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278268.001.0001

Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V. 2018. World of Faith and World of Disbelief: Expansion and Reduction of Religiosity. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 8-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.02

Grishin I. 2017. Sweden’s Immigration Worries. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, Vol. 61. No. 9. P. 66-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-9-66-76

Diligenskii G.G. 1994. Sotsial’no-politicheskaya psikhologiya [Socio-Political Psychology]. Moscow: Nauka Publishers. 304 p. (In Russ.).

Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. 2008. Global’nyi kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii. Sotsial’no-filosofskii analiz vzaimootnoshenii ekonomiki i obshchestva [Global Capitalism: Three Great Transformations. Socio-philosophical Analysis of the Relationship of the Economy and Society]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revoly­utsiya Publishers. 608 p. (In Russ.).

Foucault M. 2012. Dits et Écrits. Articles, Politiques Conférences Interviews 1970-1984. (Russ. ed.: Foucault M. Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu. Chast’ 1. Stat’i i interv’yu 1970-1984. Moscow: Praxis. 384 p.)

Habermas J. 2008. Notes on a Post-Secular Society. Both Religious and Secular Mentalities Must Be Open to a Complementary Learning Process If We Are to Balance Shared Citizenship and Cultural Difference. (Russ. ed. Habermas J. Protiv “voinstvuyushchego ateizma”. “Postsekulyarnoe” obshchestvo — chto eto takoe? O novom evropeiskom poryadke. – Russkii zhurnal. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Protiv-voinstvuyuschego-ateizma (accessed 01.03.2019); see also: http://www.signandsight.com/features/1714.html).

Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia]. 2017. Ed. by I. Semenenko. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 992 p. (In Russ.).

Kholodkovskii K. 2018. The Crisis of the Left Policy. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 62. No. 9. P. 26-35. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-26-35

Massovaya politika: institutsional’nye osnovaniya [Mass Policy: Institutional Bases]. 2016. Ed. by S.V. Patrushev. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia Publishers. 268 p. (In Russ.)

Mir 2035. Global’nyi prognoz [World 2035. Global Forecast]. 2017. Ed. by A. Dynkin. Moscow: Magistr Publishers. 352 p. (In Russ.)

Miroshnichenko I.V., Morozova E.V. 2017. Network Public Policy: Outlines of Subject Field. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 82-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.06

Panarin A.S. 1999. Global’noe politicheskoe prognozirovanie v usloviyakh strategicheskoi nestabil’nosti [Global Political Forecasting in the Context of Strategic Instability]. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 272 p. (In Russ.)

Pantin V.I., Lapkin V.V. 2014. Istoricheskoe prognozirovanie v XXI veke: Tsikly Kondrat’eva, evolyutsionnye tsikly i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya [Historical Forecasting in the 21st century: Kondratieff’s Cycles, Evolutionary Cycles and Prospects for World Development]. Dubna: Phoenix-plus. 456 p. (In Russ.)

Peregudov S.P., Semenenko I.S. 2008. Korporativnoe grazhdanstvo: kontseptsii, mirovaya praktika i rossiiskie realii [Corporate Citizenship: Concepts, International Experience and Russian Realities]. Moscow: Progress- Traditsiya Publishers. 448 p. (In Russ.)

Psikhologiya politicheskogo vospriyatiya v sovremennoi Rossii [Psychology of Political Perception in Modern Russia]. 2012. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 423 p.

Sadovaya E.S. 2018. People in a Digital Society: Dynamics of Social and Labor Relations. – South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 6-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-6-20

Sadovaya E.S. 2018. Digital Economy and a New Paradigm of the Labor Market. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, Vol. 62. No. 12. P. 35-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-35-45

Semenenko I.S. 2012. “Homo Politicus” Facing Alternative Political Developments: Rethinking the Individual Dimension of Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 9-26. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2012/6/3.pdf (accessed 12.03.2019).

Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. 2016. Classifying Ethnic Conflicts: Challenges for Political Theory and Methodology. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 69-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.06.06

Sen A. 2016. The Idea of Justice. (Russ. ed.: Sen A. Ideya spravedlivosti. Moscow: The Gaidar Institute Publishers; Liberal Mission Foundation. 520 p.)

Solovyov A.I. 2018. State and Society: New Facets of Historical Conflict. – South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 6-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-4-6-24

Strategicheskii global’nyi prognoz 2030. Rasshirennyi variant [Strategic Global Forecast 2030. Expanded version]. 2011. Ed. by A. Dynkin. Moscow: Magistr Publishers. 480 p. (In Russ.)

Svyatitel’ Nikolai Serbskii (Velimirovich). 2018. O Boge i lyudyakh. Alfavitnye glavy [St. Nicholaj Velimirović. About God and People. Alphabetic Chapters]. Moscow: Novoe Nebo Publishers. 252 p. (In Russ.)

Yanitsky O.N. 2018. Globalizatsiya. Gorod. Chelovek [Globalization. City. Person]. Moscow: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 177 p. (In Russ.) 

See also: