Language Politics as Part of the Electoral Struggle in Catalonia (2006-2017)
Borisova N.V.,
Dean of Faculty of History and Political Science, Perm State University, borisova_nv@psu.ru
elibrary_id: 77227 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4516-0820 | RESEARCHER_ID: G-8490-2018
Filippova E.Y.,
student of master program on Political science of Faculty of History and Political Science, Perm State University, eugenia_philippova@mail.ru
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.09
Borisova N.V., Filippova E.Y. Language Politics as Part of the Electoral Struggle in Catalonia (2006-2017). – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.09
Empirical data was collected as part of the implementation of the research project of the Russian Science Foundation No. 15-18-00034 “Ensuring a balance in interethnic relations: regional autonomies, integrity of the state and the rights of ethnic minorities” (headed by P.V. Panov)
Language regime, based on a normative recognition of the co-official status of regional language, is needed in institutionally maintained public consensus. This consensus depends on a set of interlocking factors: the content and scope of language preferential policy, concerns and claims of political actors embroiled in language politics, and the changing political context. The article analyses the role of language policy as a topic in the electoral programs of the political parties of Catalonia in the context of the Barcelona – Madrid conflict. It focuses on the electoral agenda and political parties’ involvement in language politics. By a comparative analysis of party programs, we offer insights into the variability of language claims and their links with the position of parties in the conflict. The comparison indicates that the co-official status of Spanish Castilian and Catalan in regional linguistic space is not to be disputed. However, regional and national parties variously interpret and approve of this co-official status. For regional branches of national parties, there is united support for Spanish Castilian and Catalan having equal status. Regional parties advocate the dominant position of Catalan, the next development of language preferential policy. They claim to improve Catalan as tool for consolidation of community. Operational contestation of a language regime is in the rhetoric of Catalan Independentists. The status of Catalan, and discussion about the content and scope of language preferential policy, plays a symbolic role in the conflict between Catalonia and Spain. The reinforcement of claims of Independentists to re-evaluate the parity of Catalan and Spanish Castilian acts as an instrument of ethnic mobilization.
References
Borisova N., Sulimov K. 2018. Language Territorial Regimes in Multilingual Ethnic Territorial Autonomies. – Nationalities Papers. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 358-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1351938
Calvert R. 1992. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. Rochester: University of Rochester.
Cardinal L., Sonntag S. 2015. State Traditions and Language Regimes: A Historical Institutionalism Approach to Language Policy. – European and Regional Studies. No. 8. P. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0010
Gazzola M. 2014. The Evaluation of Language Regimes. Theory and Application to Multilingual Patent Organisations. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Liu A. 2015. Standardizing Diversity: the Political Economy of Language Regimes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 256 p.
Miller H., Miller K. 1996. Language Policy and Identity: the Case of Catalonia. – International Studies in Sociology of Education. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021960060106
Patten A. 2001. Political Theory and Language Policy. – Political Theory. No. 5. Vol. 29. P. 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005005
Borisova N. 2017. Kogda yazyki v ogne: osparivanie yazykovykh rezhimov kak vyzov balansu v mezhetnicheskikh otnosheniyakh [By the Time of Debating on Languages: Impugnment of Language Regimes as a Challenge to Interethnic Balance]. Мoscow: Politicheskaya ehnciklopediya Publ. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Khenkin S.M. Dialektika suvereniteta v Ispanii: natsiya i natsional'nosti [Dialectics of Sovereignty in Spain: a Nation and Nationality]. – Asimmetriya mirovoi sistemy suvereniteta: zony problemnoi gosudarstvennosti [Asymmetry of the World Sovereignty System: Zones of Troubled Stateness]. Moscow: MGIMO-University. P. 65-84. (In Russ.)
Mukharyamov N. 2017. Politika yazyka i yazykovaya politika [Languge Politics and Language Policy]. – Identichnost': lichnost', obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. An Encyclopaedia]. Ed. by. I. Semenenko, V. Lapkin, E. Morozova, I. Prokhorenko, L. Fadeeva. Moscow: Ves' mir Publ. P. 677-684. (In Russ.)
Poggeschi G. 2003. Linguistic Rights in Spain. – Kazanskij Federalist. No. 3. P. 113-128. (In Russ.)
Sulimov K. 2017. The Dynamics of Ethnic Regional Autonomies’ Subjectness and The Balance in Interethnic Relations. – Political Science (RU). No. 4. P. 206-225. (In Russ.)
See also:
Tishkov V.A.,
Language Situation and Language Policy in Russia (Revising Categories and Practices). – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No3
Kasimov R.Kh., Akoulich M.M.,
Areal language policies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No1
Gronskaya N.E.,
Virtual Dimensions of Languages Policy: Conflict-Bearing Character of Linguistic Coexistence. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Afanasyev M.N.,
Electors' Behaviour and Electoral Politics in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No3
Glavachek P.,
Political parties and society in contemporary Belarus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2