.jpg)
print“Political Atlas of the Modern World” Revisited
Melville A.Yu.,
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, amelville@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 251142 | ORCID: 0000-0002-1414-5783 | RESEARCHER_ID: B-1152-2014
Mironyuk M.G.,
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, mmironyuk@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 251177 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8183-3084 | RESEARCHER_ID: K-9102-2015
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.06.04
For citation:
Melville A.Yu., Mironyuk M.G. “Political Atlas of the Modern World” Revisited. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.06.04
Abstract
In this article, we present the results of the development of the “Political Atlas of the Modern World” (“Atlas 1.0”) project. “Atlas-1.0” was implemented more than ten years ago by scholars of the MGIMO University with the support of the Institute of Public Projects and the “Expert” magazine. Development of five complex indices – of stateness, external and internal threats, the potential of international influence, the quality of life and the institutional foundations of democracy – was one of the major results of the “Atlas-1.0” project. The method of discriminant analysis was used to calculate the ratings of 191 UN member states (as well as Taiwan) as of 2005. The results obtained, reflecting various aspects of the existence of modern states, were compressed into four principal components. The four of them in the complex were interpreted as an analytical model of the modern world structure. In the project implemented ten years later at the Higher School of Economics with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (“Atlas 2.0”), the results obtained in the earlier atlas were tested for durability, corrections were made for the emergence of new UN member states, the components of the indices were refined, new statistical databases were used and advanced methods of ultivariate statistical analysis were employed. The performed operations fit into the tradition of “revisited” which is part of the modern social sciences. A number of meaningful conclusions about the dynamics of the world structure have been made. The results obtained (configurations of the principal components) indicate the significant stability of the basic parameters of the world structure. At the same time, important elements of dynamics have also been revealed.
Keywords
state, world politics, multivariate statistical analysis, index, rating, principal components.
References
Aleskerov F., Shvydun S. 2019. Stability and Similarity in Networks Based on Topology and Nodes Importance. – Complex Networks and Their Applications VII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Ed. by Aiello L., Cherifi C., Cherifi H., Lambiotte R., Lio P., Rocha L. Vol. 812. Cham: Springer. P. 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_8
Aleskerov F., Gavrilenkova I., Shvydun S., Yakuba V. 2020. Power Distribution in the Networks of Terrorist Groups: 2001-2016. – Group Decision and Negotiation. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09674-2
Almond G., Verba S. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.
Melville A., Akhremenko A., Mironyuk M. 2019. What Russia Can Teach Us about Power and Influence in World Politics. – Russian Politics. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00402001
Political Atlas of the Modern World: An Experiment in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of the Political Systems of Modern States. 2011. Ed. by A. Melville et al. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 256 p.
Shvydun S. 2019. Influence of Countries in the Global Arms Transfers Network: 1950–2018. – Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Ed. by H. Cherifi, S. Gaito, J. Mendes, E. Moro, L. Rocha. Vol. 882. Cham: Springer. P. 736-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_59
The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytic Study. 1980. Ed. by G. Almond, S. Verba. Boston: Little, Brown. 421 p.
Akhremenko A.S., Gorelskiy I.E., Melville A.Yu. 2019a. How and Why Should We Measure and Compare State Capacity of Different Countries? Theoretical and Methodological Foundations. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 8-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.02
Akhremenko A.S., Gorelskiy I.E., Melville A.Yu. 2019b. How and Why Should We Measure and Compare State Capacity of Different Countries? An Experiment with Empirical Research. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 49-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.04
Akhremenko A.S., Mironyuk M.G. 2019. Dynamics of the Potential of Influence of States (Based on the Materials of the Project “Political Atlas of the Modern World”. – Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. No. 1. P. 39-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904990003941-7
Akhremenko A.S., Myachin A.L. 2019. Pattern Analysis and Clustering in the Study of State Capacity: “Adaptive Optics” for Political Science. – Political Science (RU). No. 3. P. 112-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.05
Gorel’skii I.E., Mironyuk M.G. 2019. Climbing the Status Ladder: An Experiment in Empirical Research of Relation between Status – Political Science (RU). No. 3. P. 140-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.06
Melville A.Yu. 2006. “Political Atlas of Modern Time”: Conception and General Theoretical and Methodological Outline of the Project. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 6-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.05.02
Melville A.Yu. 2018. Power and Influence of Modern States within the Changing World Order: Some Theoretical and Methodological Aspects. – Political Science (RU). No. 1, P. 173-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2018.02.00
Mironyuk M., Toloknev K., Maltsev A. 2018. Not so Obsolete Military. Power in World Politics to Wage War, to Avoid War and (or) to Gain Recognition? – International Trends. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 26-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.2
“Political Atlas of the Modern World”: Experience in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of Political Systems of Modern States (head of the team of authors Melville A.Yu.). 2007. Moscow: Publishing house “MGIMO University”. 272 p. (In Russ.)
Zheglov S.A., Polunin Yu.A. 2019. The Potential of International Influence: Experience of Discriminant Analysis (on the Materials of the “Political Atlas of the Modern World”). – Political Science (RU). No. 2. P. 76-111. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.04
Content No. 6, 2020
See also:
Melville A.Yu., Stukal D.K.,
Conditions of democracy and limits of democratization. Factors of regime changes in post-communist countries: an experience of comparative and multidimensional statistical analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3
Alekseyeva T.A.,
Reflections on modern world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3
Melville A.Yu., Malgin A.V., Mironyuk M.G., Stukal D.K.,
Empirical challenges and methodological approaches in comparative politics (through the lens of the Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0). – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No5
Patrushev S.V.,
The Modern World’s Arrangement. What We Have Learned and What We Should Like to Learn in the Epoch of Csisis. Listing One Book’s Pages. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Bronzino L.Yu.,
Specifics of Migration from Russia to Europe in the Course of Crisis: the Flight of the Creative Class. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)