print

Civilization as a Process:
Multiplied Subjects of Postmodernity

Neklessa A.I.,

Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, neklessa@intelros.ru

elibrary_id: 74629 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.04

Rubric: Theme of the Issue: Innovative Policy and Global Change

For citation:

Neklessa A.I. Civilization as a Process: Multiplied Subjects of Postmodernity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.04

Abstract

The article is devoted several aspects emerging in the current transit of civilization – the genesis, the problems, and the prospects regarding the development of trans-border innovative enterprises (anthropo- social structures – ASS). Attention is drawn to their growth in number, multiplication, diversity, high adaptability, other specific qualities, and competitive advantages. Civilization is a dynamic concept, a social analogue of evolution, and these ambitious enterprises are subjects of historical competition. Globalization, which expands space for operations and range of communications, is accompanied by the individuation of a significant number of ambitious persons (manterprisers) vs. mass society and inclusive atomization. Crises of modern political structures and the spread of social, technical, and anthropological complexities, as well as the creation of innovative virtual “cloud structures” etc, disrupt the existing balance of power and distort the modern world order. Forecast technics, based on a transdisciplinary approach, global dimensions, and a long-term perspective, are elaborated to predict the future, yet they are not very effective. Methodology for complex systems/operations analysis replaces long-term calculations with nonlinear dynamics, global generalizations with fractality evaluations, and disciplinary approach with attention to breakthrough situations. Deep education is a fusion of core motivation (mission) with the purposes of action (vision), knowledge with exploration, and personal growth. Socially motivated enterprises form ASS-ensembles, which tend to generate a universal Postmodern infrastructure upon the pillars of Modernity. The article also presents typology of social evolution strategies and provides historical examples of their implementation, which vary significantly, depending on the intentions of the main actor of a strategy. New forms of conflict and political alliances emerge. The fight for the future is an asymmetrical co-evolution of entities with interests that are not quite matching yet not quite opposites. In times of crises, competition escalates: someone wins, someone loses, someone goes to the dustbin of history. The search for evolutionary strategy, methods of cognition and technologies of action effective in the hybrid environment of civilizational transit, is on the agenda. 

Keywords

evolution, civilization, transformation, anthropo-social structures, strategy, enterprise, complexity, management, personality, intangible assets.

 Full Text 

Adami C. 1995. Self-Organized Criticality in Living Systems. – Physics Letters. Vol. 203. No. 1. P. 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(95)00372-A

Blair L. 1975. Rhythms of Vision: The Changing Patterns of Belief. London: Croom Helm Ltd.

Jung C.G., Pauli W. 1955. The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche: Synchronicity: an Acausal Connecting Principle. Bollingen series (Vol. 51). New York: Pantheon Books.

Merleau-Ponty М. 1955. Les Aventures de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.

Sheldrake R. 1988. The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. New York: Times Books.

Aristotle. 1983. Politika [Politics]. – Aristotle. Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. [Works in 4 vol.]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)

Carroll L. 1978. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Through the Looking-Glass and what Alice Found There. (Russ. ed.: Carroll L. Priklyucheniya Alisy v strane chudes. Skvoz’ zerkalo   chto tam uvidela Alisa, ili Alisa v zazerkal’e. Moscow: Nauka).

Gvishiani D.M. 1997. Rimskij klub – istorija sozdanija i razvitija [The Club of Rome. – History of Creation and Development]. – Rimskij klub. Istorija sozdanija, izbrannye doklady i vystuplenija, oficial’nye materialy. [The Club of Rome. History of Creation, Selected Reports and Speeches, Official Materials]. Ed. by D.M. Gvishiani, A.I. Kolchin, E.V. Netesova, A.A. Sejtov. Moscow: URSS. P. 23-58. (In Russ.).

Martin H.-P., Schumann H. 2001. Die Globalisi Erungsfalle. der Angriff auf Demokratien und Wohlstand. (Russ. ed.: Martin H.-P., Schumann H. Zapadnya globalizacii: ataka na procvetaniye I demokratiyu. Moscow: Alpina).

Marx К. 1957. Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte. – Marx К., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 8. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)

Neklessa A.I. 2013. Jump of a Frog. The Crises of World-Vision. – SINLA / INTELROS. No. 1. P. 44. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/Neklessa/Frog/LEAP%20FROG_NECLESSA%20_FINAL_new.pdf (accessed 12.07.2021).

Neklessa A.I. 2020a. Afrasian Zone of Instability and The Riddles of the Russian Strategy Planning. – Vostok (Oriens). No. 2. P. 138–148. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.31857/S086919080009062-5

Neklessa A.I. 2020b. The Transit of Civilization: Methodological and Prognostic Aspects. – Economics of Contemporary Russia. No. 4. P. 132-146. https://www.doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-4(91)-132-146

Novye izmereniya AS (antropologicheskikh i sotsial’nykh) prostranstv: prognoz razvitiya [New Dimensions of AS (Anthropological and Social) Spaces: Development Forecast]. 1990. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union.

Perspektivy AS (antropologicheskoi i sotsial’noi) transformatsii v sovremennom mire [Prospects for AS (Anthropological and Social) Transformation in the Modern World]. 1990. Moscow: Center for Human Sciences, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union.

Polanyi К. 2002. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (Russ. ed.: Polanyi К. Velikaya transformaciya: politicheskie I ekonomicheskiye istoki nashego vremeni. St. Petersburg: Aletheia).

Rudenko R.A. 1999. Vstupitel’naja rech’ Glavnogo obvinitelja Mezhdunarodnogo Voennogo Tribunala ot SSSR R.A. Rudenko. Stenogramma zasedanija 8 fevralja 1946 g. [Introductory Speech by Chif Military Attorney of the USSR R.A. Rudenko]. – Njurnbergskij Process. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russ.)

Spinoza B. 1997. Short Treatise on God, Man and His Well-Being. (Russ. ed.: Spinoza B. Kratkiy traktat o Boge, cheloveke i ego schast’e. St. Petersburg: ZAO “Pergam”).

Stalin I.V. 1947. O politicheskoj strategii i taktike russkih kommunistov [About Russian Communist’s Political Strategy and Tactics]. – Stalin I.V. Sochinenija. Vol. 5. Moscow: OGIZ; Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo poli­ticheskoj literatury. (In Russ.)

Tenenbaum B. 2011. Velikij Cherchill’ [The Great Cherchill]. Moscow: EKSMO-Jauza. (In Russ.)

Тrotskiy L.D. 1939. USSR at War. – Bulleten oppozicii (bolshevikov-lenincev). No. 79-80. New York. (In Russ.)

Тrotskiy L.D. 1940. Nature of the USSR. – Bulleten oppozicii (bolshevikov-lenincev). No. 82-83. New York. (In Russ.)

Veyne P. 2013. Foucault, sa pensée, sa personne. (Russ. ed.: Veyne P. Fuko. Ego mysl’ i lichnost’. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’. (In Russ.) 

See also: