.jpg)
printDilemmas of the Modern Theory of Political Elites:
What’s Next?
Alekseyeva T.A.,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia, ataleks@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 1361 |
Loshkariov I.D.,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia, ivan1loshkariov@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 639886 | ORCID: 0000-0002-7507-1669 |
Parenkov D.A.,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia, dparenkov@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 701908 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.06
For citation:
Alekseyeva T.A., Loshkariov I.D., Parenkov D.A. Dilemmas of the Modern Theory of Political Elites: What’s Next? – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.06
The research was undertaken within the framework of the research project of MGIMO-University’s Institute of international studies №1921-01-03 “Elite interactions in the modern world: the possibilities of influencing external and internal political processes in the context of the crisis of big ideologies, populist waves and the growing role of security issues”.
Abstract
The article fixes the most important problems and elements of inconsistency in the modern theory of political elites; these need to be independently addressed, as well as requiring some corrections and revisions in the very elite studies. The authors record the state of research of the elites and the main problems in the current scientific periodicals, and highlight three anomalies in the theoretical knowledge of the elites. The first serious anomaly is associated with the use of binary logic in the analysis of complex socio-political processes that accompany political decision-making. The dichotomy of “elite / non-elite” corresponds to the level and conceptual grid of the mechanistic scientific picture of the world, which becomes a problem in the analysis of modern inter-elite and intra-country political interactions. The second anomaly consists in a significant overestimation of the role and content of the consensus the elites have on the main contours of political organization in states. Such forms of communication within the political elite undoubtedly exist, but the very configuration of the elite can contribute to the formation of relatively fragile and short-lived forms of consensus. Moreover, within the general structure of inter-elite interactions, this consensus does not appear so often, in contrast to other practices formed by political institutions, identity, and so on. Finally, the third anomaly is associated with the widespread thesis about the presence of certain ideological and cognitive differences between the elite and the rest of the population, to a degree that these differences are due to the peculiarities of upbringing, professional development, and external factors in the development of the elite. The authors conclude that modern studies in this direction do not find evidence of the presence of such ideological and cognitive differences, but also find empirical data that contradicts the thesis. In conclusion, the authors argue the need to overcome these anomalies through a theoretical synthesis between studies of elites and studies of political decision making and the political process.
Keywords
political elites, elite–non-elite dichotomy, elite consensus, theory of political elites.
References
Albertus M., Menaldo V. 2018. Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Сambridge: Cambridge University Press. 322 р.
Aron R. 1950. Social Structure and the Ruling Class: Part 2. – The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 126-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/587553
Bachrach P. 1962. Elite Consensus and Democracy. – The Journal of Politics. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600015425
Barnum D.G., Sullivan J. L. 1990. The Elusive Foundations of Political Freedom in Britain and the United States. – Journal of Politics. No. 52. P. 719-739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131824
Baylis T.A. 2012. Elite consensus and political polarization: Cases from Central Europe. – Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 90-106.
Beck U. 2005. The Cosmopolitan State: Redefining Power in the Global Age. – International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. Vol. 18. No. 3-4. P. 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9001-1
Bratton M., Van de Walle N. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 330 p.
Cammack P.A. 1990. A Critical Assessment of the New Elite Paradigm. – American Sociological Review. Vol. 55. No. 3. P. 415-420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095765
Chen M. 2012. Being Elite, 1931–2011: Three Generations of Social Change. – Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 21. No. 77. P. 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.684957
Collier D., Adcock R. 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices About Concepts. – Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 537-565. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537
Conti J.A., O’Neil M. 2007. Studying Power: Qualitative Methods and the Global Elite. – Qualitative Research. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071421
Cousin B., Khan S., Mears A. 2018. Theoretical and Methodological Pathways for Research on Elites. – Socio-Economic Review. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy019
Dye T.R., Pickering J.W. 1974. Governmental and Corporate Elites: Convergence and Differentiation. – The Journal of Politics. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 900-925. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129400
Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. 1992. Ed. by J. Higley, R. Gunther. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elman C. 2005. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. – International Organization. Vol. 59. No. 2. Р. 293-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050101
Ezrow L., Homola J., Tavits M. 2014. When Extremism Pays: Policy Positions, Voter Certainty, and Party Support In Postcommunist Europe. – The Journal of Politics. Vol. 76. No. 2. P. 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001461
Fisun O. 2012. Rethinking Post-Soviet Politics from a Neopatrimonial Perspective. – Democratizatsiya. The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 87-96.
Gelman V. 2002. Russia’s Elites in Search of Consensus: What Kind of Consolidation? – Demokratizatsiya. The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 343-361.
Geraint P. 1969. Political Elites. New York, Praeger. 168 p.
Gerring J. 2012. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilens M., Page B. I. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. – Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Guttsman W.L. 1960. Social Stratification and Political Elite. – British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 137-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/587421
Hale H.E. 2014. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 558 p.
Herrera R. 1996. Understanding the Language of Politics: A Study of Elites and Masses. – Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 111. No. 4. P. 619-637. https://doi.org/10.2307/2152087
Higley J., Moore G. 2001. Political Elite Studies at the Year 2000: Introduction. – International Review of Sociology. Vol. 11. No. 2. Р. 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713674036
Higley J. 2018. Continuities and Discontinuities in Elite Theory. – The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Ed. by H. Best, J. Higley. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 25-39.
Higley J., Hoffmann-Lange U., Kadushin Ch., Moore G. 1991. Elite Integration in Stable Democracies: A Reconsideration. – European Sociological Review. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036576
Hoffman-Lange U. 1989. Positional Power and Political Influence in the Federal Republic of Germany. – European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00181.x
Jennings M.K. 1992. Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites. – Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 56. No. 4. Р. 419-441. https://doi.org/10.1086/269335
Keohane R.O., Nye Jr. J.S. 1973. Power and Interdependence. – Survival. Vol. 15. No. 4. Р. 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409
Kitschelt H. 2000. Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. – Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 33. No. 6-7. Р. 845-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607
Lengyel G. 2014. Elites in Hard Times: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Conceptual Framework. – Comparative Sociology. Vol. 13. No. 1. Р. 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341292
Lowell G.F., Higley J., Burton M. 1990. A New Elite Framework for Political Sociology. – Revue européenne des sciences sociales. Vol. 28. No. 88. P. 149-182.
Lupia A. 2002. Who Can Persuade Whom? Implications from the Nexus of Psychology and Rational Choice Theory. – Thinking About Political Psychology. Ed. by J.H. Kuklinski. New York: Cambridge University Press. P. 51-88.
McClosky H. 1964. Consensus and Ideology in American Politics. – The American Political Science Review. Vol. 58. No. 2. P. 361-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952868
Mosca G. 1939. The Ruling Class. New York-London: McGraw Book Company. 573 p.
Pakulski J. 2018. The Development of Elite Theory. – The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Ed. by H. Best, J. Highey. London, Palgrave Macmillan. P. 9-16.
Partridge P.H. 1971. Consent and Consensus. London: Pall Mall. 165 p.
Peffley M., Rohrschneider R. 2003. Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-Level Model of Democratic Learning. – Political Research Quarterly. Vol. 56. No. 3. P. 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600301
Prewitt K., Stone A. 1973. The Ruling Elites: Elite Theory, Power, and American Democracy. HarperCollins Publishers. 244 p.
Putnam R.D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 246 р.
Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. 1979. Attitude Stability Among Italian Elites. – American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 463-494.
Reisinger W.M. 1995. The Renaissance of a Rubric: Political Culture as Concept and Theory. – International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Vol. 7. No. 4. Р. 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/7.4.328
Roessler P. 2016. Ethnic Politics and State Power in Africa: The Logic of the Coup-Civil War Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 414 р.
Searing D.D., Jacoby W.G., Tyner A.H. 2019. The Endurance of Politicians’ Values Over Four Decades: A Panel Study. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 113. No. 1. P. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000692
Steenbergen M.R., Edwards E.E., De Vries C.E. 2007. Who’s Cueing Whom? Mass-Elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration. – European Union Politics. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507073284
Sullivan J.L., Walsh P., Shamir M., Barnum D.G., Gibson J.L.. 1993. Why Politicians Are More Tolerant: Selective Recruitment and Socialization Among Political Elites in Britain, Israel, New Zealand and the United States. – British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 23. No. 1. Р. 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006566
The Invention of IR Theory? The Rockefeller Foundation and the 1954 Conference on Theory. 2011. Ed. by N. Guilnot. NY: Columbia University Press.
Von Beyme K. 1996. The Concept of Political Class: A New Dimension of Research on Elites? – West European Politics. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425121
Ward K.G., Jones M. 1999. Researching Local Elites: Reflexivity, ‘Situatedness’ and Political-Temporal Contingency. – Geoforum. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00022-6
Wedel J.R. 2017. From Power Elites to Influence Elites: Resetting Elite Studies for the 21st Century. – Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 34. No. 5-6. P. 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417715311
Weible C., Sabatier P. (Eds.). 2018. Theories of Policy Process. New York: Westview Press. 416 p.
Wildavsky A. 1987. Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 81. No. 1. P. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960776
Zannoni P. 1978. The Concept of Elite. – European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1978.tb00547.x
Alekseeva T.A. 2012. Chimeras of the Oz Country: Cultural Turn in IR Theory. – International Trends. Vol. 10. No. 3-4. P. 4-19. (In Russ.)
Alekseeva T.A. 2017. Theory of International Relations in the Mirrors of “Scientific Pictures of the World”: What’s Next? – Comparative Politics Russia. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 30-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-4-30-41
Alekseeva T.A., Mineev A.P., Loshkariov I.D. 2017. “Quantum-like” Theory of Decision Making in Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 4. P. 22-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.04.03
Ashin G.K. 2010. Elitologiya: istoriya, teoriya, sovremennost’: monografiya [Elite Studies: History, Theory, Current Stage: A Monograph]. Moscow: MGIMO University. 600 p. (In Russ.)
Bitkova T.G. 2009. Sovremennaya rumynskaya elita: istoki i politicheskie predpochteniya [The Modern Romanian Elite: Origins and Political Preferences]. – Elity v stranakh Vostochnoi Evropy (nachalo XXI veka) [Elites in Eastern Europe (Beginning of the XXI Century)]. Ed. by L.N. Shanshieva. Moscow: INION RAN. P. 53-77. (In Russ.)
Brubaker R. 2012. Ethnicity Without Groups. (Russ. ed.: Brubaker R. Etnichnost‘ bez grupp. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House. 408 p.)
Duka A.V. 2017. Transformation of Post-Soviet Political and Administrative Elites. – Current Problems of Europe. No. 2. P. 14-54. (In Russ.)
Gaman-Golutvina O.V. 2000. Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 97-103. (In Russ.)
Gaman-Golutvina O.V. 2016. Political Elites as an Object of Research in National Political Science. – Political Science (RU). No. 2. P. 38-73. (In Russ.)
Ilyin M.V. 2018. Modern Political Science: Crisis or Development? – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 40-67. (In Russ.)
Kochetkov A.P. 2020. Transnatsional’nye elity v global’nom mire [Transnational Elites in the Global World]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Kryshtanovskaya O.V. 2004. Modern Concepts of the Political Elite and Russian Experience. – Mir Rossii. Vol. Т. XIII. No. 4. P. 3-39. (In Russ.)
Kuhn T. 2003. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Russ. ed.: Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij. Moscow: AST. 605 p.)
Lem S. 2018. Eden. (Russ. ed.: Lem S. Edem. Moscow: AST. 320 p.)
Mills Ch. 1959. The Power Elite. (Russ. ed.: Mills Ch. Vlastvuyushchaya elita. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury. 543 p.)
Minchenko E.N. 2012. Bol’shoe pravitel’stvo Vladimira Putina i “Politbyuro 2.0” [The Big Government of Vladimir Putin and Politbureau 2.0]. (In Russ.) URL: https://minchenko.ru/netcat_files/userfiles/2/Dokumenty/Politbyuro_i_bolshoe_pravitelstvo-2-2.pdf (accessed 10.09.2020).
Mokhov V.P. 2012. Local Political Elite in Russia: Concept, Structure, Numbers. – PolitBook. No. 4. P. 19-33. (In Russ.)
Pareto V. 2007. Compendio di sociologia generale. (Russ. ed.: Pareto V. Kompendium po obshchei sotsiologii. Moscow: GU VShE. 576 p.)
Petrov K.E. 2020. Images of Political Leaders in Modern Conditions Through the Prism of Classical Concepts. Humanities and Social Sciences. – Bulletin of the Financial University. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 6-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2020-10-3-6-14
Scholte J.A., Tallberg J., Verhaegen S. 2019. Otnoshenie elit k global‘nomu upravleniyu. Doklad po rezul’tatam oprosa elit v ramkakh programmy “Legitimnost’ v global’nom upravlenii” [Elite Attitudes Toward Global Governance. A report of summary findings from the LegGov Elite Survey]. (In Russ.) URL: https:// www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/events/2019/18112019/Report-18112019_rus.pdf (accessed 10.09.2020).
Smirnov V.A. 2017. Politicheskie elity v malykh stranakh: voprosy teorii [Political Elites in Smaller Countries: Theoretical Issues]. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. 151 p. (In Russ.)
Stepin V.S. 2012. Scientific Rationality in Technogenic Culture: Types and Historic Evolution. – Voprosy filosofii. No. 5. P. 18-25. (In Russ.)
Content No. 5, 2021
See also:
Shebanova M.A.,
International bureaucracy as the stratum of transnational political elites. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1
Ponedelkov A.V., Starostin A.M.,
Russia’s Regional Administrative-Political Elites: the Past, the Present, the Future. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No6
Rutland P.,
Russia’s Post-Soviet Elite. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No3
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Gaman-Golutvina O.V., Avdonin V.S., Sergeyev S.A., Chernikova V.V., Sidenko O.A., Sokolov A.V., Evdokimov N.A., Tupaev A.V., Slatinov V.B., Zhukov I.K., Kozlova N.N., Rassadin S.V., Chugrov S.V.,
Regional political processes: how «subjective» are subjects of the RF. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5
Kochetkov A.P.,
Authority and elites in a global information society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
.jpg)
.jpg)