.jpg)
printA spatial displacement only? Migration in the light of justice concepts
Apanovich M.Yu.,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia, maria.apanovich@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 741042 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.05
For citation:
Apanovich M.Yu. A spatial displacement only? Migration in the light of justice concepts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.05
Abstract
A study of political discourse on global migration in the light of justice and human rights concepts reveals of two polar points of view. Proponents of the first disposition associate movement with citizenship, have freedoms and rights, but only within internal borders. Thus, the state acts as a restrictor and a regulator of migration flows. Another perspective goes beyond national borders, granting everyone rights and freedoms. The concept of global governance and the creation of regimes in certain areas brings to the discussion the possibility of abandoning ‘local’ barriers and, following globalization, building a global public concept. At the same time, external factors exert influence upon the development and popularity of theories. And in terms of the movement of people around the world, or ‘global migration,’ they are prevailing, setting a pattern of development. In recent decades, the formation and scale of new types of cross-border migration definitely indicate the importance of this issue. At the same time, most of the analytical papers focus on case studies and isolated trends of recent years. This article analyzes the current discussion of the possibilities and limitations of migration from the point of view of political science and J. Rawls’ theory of justice. The author aims to highlight polar and more moderate points of view, as well as to correlate them with the concept of ‘global governance’ by T. Weiss, to analyze the possibilities and limitations on the way to the formation of a ‘global migration regime’, to outline the Russian approach to the role of the state in controlling migration flows, as well as to draw the reader’s attention both to new trends in the perception of migration and the direction of political discourse on this topic.
Keywords
global governance, identity, migrations, human rights, theory of justice, theories of migration.
References
Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic theory and border coercion: no right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political theory, 36 (1), 37-65.
Blake, M., & Risse, M. (2006). Is there a human right to free movement? Immigration and original ownership of the earth. HKS Working Paper No. RWP06-012. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902383
Carens, J.H. (1987). Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. The Review of Politics, 49(2), 251-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1407506
Massey, D.S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino A., & Taylor, J.E. (1993). Theories of international migration. a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462
Miller, B. (2016). Spaces of contention: spatialities and social movements. Routledge.
Oberman, K. (2016). Immigration as a human right. In S. Fine, & L. Ypi (Ed.), Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership (pp. 32-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2164939
Ravenstein, E.G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London. 48(2), 167-235. https://doi.org/10.2307/2979181
Walzer M. (1983). Spheres of justice. a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
Weiss, T.G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 207-215. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24017859
Wellman, Ch.H. (2008). Immigration and freedom of association. Ethics, 119(1), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.1086/592311
Alekseeva, T.A. (2020). Naturalism and political science adaptation to the non-classical world picture. Social’nye i gumanitarnye znanija, 6(2), 112-121. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-2-112-121
Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2016). Political Science as metadisciplinary matrix. International Trends, 14(1), 86-94. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.1.44.7
Volokh, V.A. (2015). Population shift as object of scientific research: essence, modern treatments and classification. PolitBook, 1, 7-15. (In Russ.)
Content No. 1, 2022
See also:
Sungurov A.Yu.,
Human rights as subject of political science and as interdisciplinary conception. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
Glushkova S.I.,
Individual, group, collective and general rights under the conditions of multiculturalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
Smirnov V.V.,
The human rights political science and political rights in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
Bugrov K.D., Loginov A.V.,
Back to Subject: The Theory of Just War in Contemporary Political Thought. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5
Kartzov A.S.,
Human rights and tolerance. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
.jpg)
.jpg)