Postcoloniality as a fractal aspect of postmodernity:
subject, methodology, forecast (The 70th anniversary of Alfred Sauvy’s article “Three Worlds, One Planet”)
Neklessa A.I.,
Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, neklessa@intelros.ru
elibrary_id: 74629 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.02.10
Neklessa A.I. Postcoloniality as a fractal aspect of postmodernity: subject, methodology, forecast (The 70th anniversary of Alfred Sauvy’s article “Three Worlds, One Planet”). – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.02.10
The article is based on the report “Postcoloniality: subject field, methodological foundations, social perspective” delivered at the seminar of the Center for Civilizational and Regional Studies of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The article offers an analysis of the main aspects and trends of Postcoloniality as an interdisciplinary area of scientific research and as one of the “big challenges” of the contemporary world. The actuality of the problem is determined by the need to rethink the socio-cultural heritage of civilization, its current status and prospects. Coloniality continues to exist in the postcolonial world, but the struggle for political sovereignty is replaced by the sociocultural decolonization of people and communities. In the field of disciplined reflection, Postcoloniality is positioned as a complex area of research, an academic theory and a critical concept that claims to revise the Eurocentric discourse in the field of socio-humanitarian knowledge. Postcoloniality is also one of the characteristics of the emerging postmodern Universum. A large “homeless” nomadic community is emerging on the planet, which does not fit into the Procrustean bed of geographic localization and national statehood. Postmodernity, relying on creativity, experimenting with a variety of ways of self-organization and self-realization, finds itself in a symbiotic union with Postcoloniality. Today, turning the old encumbrances into a resource, the former inhabitants of the third world are mastering the planet, forming multi-vector coalitions in a constructive/destructive way. Having acquired a transcontinental subjectivity, they intercept the strategic initiative. Alfred Sauvy’s vision of the role of the third world is coming true, the potency of which he compared seven decades ago to the transforming force that once sent the feudal-estate world order into the dustbin of history. The story of the “burden of the dark-skinned man”, having passed in its “African aspect” by a long march along the steps of Pan-Africanism, negritude, the movement of “black panthers”, Afrocentrism and BLM actionism in the entry way of the new century, has come close to the embodiment of the synthesis of Afropolitism, with Postmodernity scattered across the planet, strengthening solidarity positions of Modernity which decolonizes the integral Cosmopolitanism.
References
Hall, S., & Jacques, M. (1997). Cultural revolutions. New Statesman, 126 (4363), 24-26.
Horkheimer M. (2011). Traditionelle und kritische Theorie: Fünf Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch.
Kostelyanets, S. (2021). African migrations and diasporas: a view through space and time. Asia and Africa Today, 1, 56-59. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750013631-6
Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. On the Coloniality of being: contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21 (2-3), 240-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Mazrui, А.A. (1994). Global Africa: from abolitionists to reparationists. African Studies Rewiew, 37(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/524900
Mignolo, W.D. (2010). Desobediencia epistémica. Retórica de la modernidad, logica de la columnsialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
Mignolo, W.D. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: global futures, decolonial options. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Sauvy, A. (1952). Trois mondes, une planete. L’observateur politique, economique et litteraire, 118(14), 14.
Spivak, G.C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson, L. Grossberg (Ed.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (271-313). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Suskind, R. (2006). The One percent doctrine: deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Adorno, T.W. (2011). Negative Dialektik. (Russ. ed.: Adorno, T.W. Negativnaya dialektika. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt).
Berger, J. (2020). Ways of seeing. (Russ. ed.: Berger, J. Iskusstvo videt’. Moscow: Klaudberri).
Bowles, Ch. (1956). The new dimensions of peace. (Russ. ed.: Bowles Ch. Novye problemy mira. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007). L’Anti-Oedipe. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. (Russ. ed.: Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. Anti-Ehdip: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U- Faktoriya).
Derrida, J. (2000). De la grammatologie. (Russ. ed.: Derrida, J. O grammatologii. Moscow: Ad Marginem).
Foucault, M. (2004). L’Archéologie du savoir. (Russ. ed.: Foucault, M. Arkheologiya znaniya. Saint Petersburg: Humanitarian Academy, University Book Publishers).
Gavristova, T.M., & Khokhol’kova, N.E. (Eds.) (2020). Afrika: postkolonial’nyi diskurs [Africa: postcolonial discourse]. Moscow: Institute for African Studies. (In Russ.)
Gramsci, A. (1991). Quaderni del carcere. (Russ. ed.: Gramsci, A. Tyuremnye tetradi. Part one. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).
Khokholkova, N. (2017). Afropolitizm – novaya “prakticheskaya filosofiya dlya AfrikI” [Afropolitism is a New “Practical Philosophy for Africa”]. In Materialy XVI Vserossiiskoi shkoly molodykh afrikanistov Moskva, 28 – 29 noyabrya 2017 goda [Proceedings of the XVI All-Russian School of Young Africanists Moscow, November 28-29, 2017] (pp. 337-338). Moscow: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
Khokholkova, N. (2020). “Africans of the twenty-first century”: transcultural identity representations in the virtual space. Etnografia, 3(9), 90-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2020-3(9)-90-102
Marks, K. (1955). Thesen über Feuerbach. (Russ. ed.: Marks, K. Tezisy o Feierbakhe. In K. Marks, F. Ehngels. Sochineniya, 2nd ed., 3 (pp. 1-4). Moscow: Gospolitizdat).
Moseiko, A. (2021). Cultural codes of society: scientific and practical significance in modern African studies. Journal of the Institute for African Studies, 4, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2021-57-4-5-18
Neklessa, A.I. (2020). The transit of civilization: methodological and prognostic aspects. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 4, 132-146. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-4(91)-132-146
Neklessa, A.I. (2021a). Postcoloniality in global and regional dimensions. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(1), 9-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-1-9-19
Neklessa, A.I. (2021b). Civilization as a process: multiplied subjects of postmodernity. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 39-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.04
Said, E. (2012). Culture and imperialism. (Russ. ed.: Said, E. Kul’tura i imperialism. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’).
Sieyès, E.-J. (2003). Qu’est ce que le tiers-état? (Russ. ed.: Sieyès E.-J. Chto takoe tret’e soslovie? In Abbat Siies: ot Burbonov k Bonapartu [Abbé Sieyes: from the Bourbons to Bonaparte]. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia). (In Russ.)
Tlostanova, M. (2020). The postcolonial сondition and the decolonial option: a postsocialist mediation. New Literary Observer, 1, 66-84. (In Russ.) https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21972/
See also:
Inoguchi T.,
Political theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3
Fituni L.L., Abramova I.O.,
Political Theory of Decolonization: Essentials of Modern Reading. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6
Pastukhov V.B.,
Russia - 2000: Civilizational Choice and Constitutional Chance. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6
Beck U.,
Living in and coping with world risk society: the cosmopolitan turn. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No5
Furs V.N.,
N.Fraser’s “Feminist-Socialist” Critical Theory of Late Capitalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6