Individual experience of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and political support in Russia:
evidence from the Values in Crisis survey
Sokolov B.O.,
HSE University, St. Petersburg, Russia, bssokolov@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 690118 | ORCID: 0000-0002-5151-8147 | RESEARCHER_ID: L-6331-2015
Zavadskaya M.A.,
Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki, Finland; HSE University, St. Petersburg, Russia, mzavadskaya@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 787846 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3728-4073 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-1815-2016
Article received: 2021.11.11. Accepted: 2022.11.17
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.04.11
EDN: YGPVWJ
Sokolov B.O., Zavadskaya M.A. Individual experience of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and political support in Russia: evidence from the Values in Crisis survey. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.04.11. EDN: YGPVWJ
The article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2022-325).
The article explores how the individual experience of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the attitudes of Russians towards the country’s political system. Specifically, we use data from an online survey conducted in mid-June 2020 as part of the international research project ‘Values in Crisis’. The sample size is 1,527 respondents. The sample is representative in terms of gender and, to a somewhat lesser extent, age (as per the Russian census of 2010), although low-educated respondents and rural residents are somewhat undersampled. The dependent variable of interest is a composite index of political support that consists of four indicators: individual confidence in (1) government, (2) healthcare sector, and (3) institutions in general, as well as (4) evaluation of the efficiency of governmental efforts in handling the coronacrisis. Regression analysis demonstrates that the negative economic experience (job loss, transition to part-time job, or bankruptcy) during the initial stages of the pandemic, as well as the direct experience of the disease, are very weakly, if at all, connected to the confidence in national institutions and approval of anti-pandemic policies. The fear to contract the virus, or that respondents’ close ones would contract the virus, positively correlates with the level of political support. In its turn, anxiety about potential material losses is negatively associated with the index of support. Interestingly, COVID-19 sceptics, i.e. persons who do not view the coronavirus as a real threat or doubt its very existence, demonstrate systematically lower levels of political support. Yet, it remains unclear whether covid-skepticism causes institutional distrust or whether both variables simply reflect deeper hidden disappointment with the existing socio-political order.
References
Altiparmakis, A., Bojar, A., Brouard, S., Foucault, M., Kriesi, H., & Nadeau, R. (2021). Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1159-1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1930754
Alwin, D.F. (2007). Margins of error: a study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470146316
Baccini, L., Brodeur, A., & Weymouth, S. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2020 US Presidential Election. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 739-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3
Baker, R., Brick, J.M., Bates, N.A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M.P., Dever, J.A., & Tourangeau, R. (2012). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008
Bechtel, M.M., & Hainmueller, J. (2011). How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short‐ and long‐term electoral returns to beneficial policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 852-868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00533.x
Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A., & Loewen, P.J. (2021). The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: some good news for democracy? European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12401
Chaisty, P., Gerry, C.J., & Whitefield, S. (2021). The buck stops elsewhere: authoritarian resilience and the politics of responsibility for COVID-19 in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(5), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2021.2010397
Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174
De Vries, C.E., Bakker, B.N., Hobolt, S.B., & Arceneaux, K. (2021). Crisis signaling: how Italy's coronavirus lockdown affected incumbent support in other European countries. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(3), 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.6
Easton, D. (1975). A reassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435-457.
Erhardt, J., Freitag, M., Filsinger, M., & Wamsler, S. (2021). The emotional foundations of political support: how fear and anger affect trust in the government in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Swiss Political Science Review, 27(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12462
Esaiasson, P., Sohlberg, J., Ghersetti, M., & Johansson, B. (2021). How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment’. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 748-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12419
Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gadarian, S.K., Goodman, S.W., & Pepinsky, T.B. (2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Plos One, 16(4), e0249596. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0249596
Gasper, J.T., & Reeves, A. (2011). Make It Rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 340-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00503.x
Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920
Herrera, H., Konradt, M., Ordonez, G., & Trebesch, C. (2020). Corona politics: the cost of mismanaging pandemics. PIER Working Paper No. 20-033. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690490
Karol, D., & Miguel, E. 2007. The electoral cost of war: Iraq casualties and the 2004 US presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 633-648.
Key, V.O. (1966). The responsible electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kobak, D. (2021). Excess mortality reveals Covid's true toll in Russia. Significance, 18(1), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1740-9713.01486
Kritzinger, S., Foucault, M., Lachat, R., Partheymüller, J., Plescia, C., & Brouard, S. (2021). ‘Rally round the flag’: the COVID-19 crisis and trust in the national government. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1205-1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1925017
Lazarev, E., Sobolev, A., Soboleva, I.V., & Sokolov, B. (2014). Trial by fire: a natural disaster's impact on support for the authorities in rural Russia. World Politics, 66(4), 641-668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000215
McAllister, I., & White, S. (2008). ‘It's the economy, comrade!’ Parties and voters in the 2007 Russian Duma election. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(6), 931-957.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050-1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005278419
Mueller, J.E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. New York, NY: Wiley.
Renström, E.A., & Bäck, H. (2021). Emotions during the Covid‐19 pandemic: fear, anxiety, and anger as mediators between threats and policy support and political actions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12806
Schraff, D. (2021). Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: rally around the flag or lockdown effects? European Journal of Political Research, 60(4), 1007-1017.
Sirotkina, E., & Zavadskaya, M. (2020). When the party’s over: political blame attribution under an electoral authoritarian regime. Post-Soviet Affairs, 36(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2019.1639386
Treisman, D. (2011). Presidential popularity in a hybrid regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 590-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00500.x
Treisman, D. (2014). Putin's popularity since 2010: why did support for the Kremlin plunge, then stabilize? Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(5), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.904541
Yablokov, I. (2018). Fortress Russia: conspiracy theories in post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge; Medford, MA: Polity Press.
Zavadskaya, M., & Sokolov, B. (2020). Linkages between experiencing COVID-19 and levels of political support in Russia. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo. No. 677. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/linkages-between-experiencing-covid-19-and-levels-of-political-support-in-russia/
Makusheva, M.O., & Nestik, T.A. (2020). Socio-Psychological Preconditions and Effects of Trust in Social Institutions in a Pandemic. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 427-447. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1770
Ponarin, E.D., Klimova, A.M, & Sokolov, B.O. (2021). Values in Crisis International (Russia) 2020. Registration number: RU 2021622511.https://fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=DB&DocNumber=2021622511&TypeFile=html
Semenov, A. (2022). The distributed burden: how do Russians attribute responsibility for handling the economic crisis? Political Science, 2, 144-163. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.02.07
Sokolov, B., Zavadskaya, M., Soboleva, N., Ukhvatova, M., Shirokanova, A, & Shcherbak, A. (2021). Values in crisis: sociology of the coronavirus. Research digest of the HSE human capital multidisciplinary research centre. No. 2. (In Russ.) https://www.hse.ru/data/2022/02/21/1749373243/Human_Capital_NCMU_Digest_2_Values_In_Crisis_2021.pdf
Sokolov, B.O., Zavadskaya, M.A., Chmel, K.Sh. (2022). The dynamic of political support in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the ‘Values in Crisis’ survey. Political Science (RU), 2, 122-143. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.02.06
See also:
Latov Yu.V.,
Institutional Trust as a Social Capital in Modern Russia (on the Results of Monitoring). – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5
Arbatova N.K.,
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5
Radina N.K.,
Media models of propaganda: the COVID-19 pandemic in Russian-language media with a “different opinion”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No4
Antyukhova E.A.,
NATO in the Сrosshairs of COVID-19. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No3
Mchedlova M.M., Kazarinova D.B.,
COVID-19 Pandemic Challenge and Religion: Ontology vs Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No4