print

Tradition and innovation in politics and in development policies:
dialectics of compatibility

Semenenko I.S.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, semenenko@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 251670 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2529-9283 |

Article received: 2023.04.05. Accepted: 2023.06.07


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.05.04
EDN: GZGVJK

Rubric: Theme of the issue: concepts “the innovation” and “the tradition” in political discourse

For citation:

Semenenko I.S. Tradition and innovation in politics and in development policies: dialectics of compatibility. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.04. EDN: GZGVJK

Abstract

The article discusses diverse approaches to the conceptual analysis of socio-political change, “social development” and of “development policies” as its managed dimension. The existing research field is characterized by a deficit of adequate terms and capacious language forms to describe criteria, principles and mechanisms of social (societal) development. The basic research paradigm of social development also needs to be revised. Within the framework of theoretical models describing societal development, the dichotomy of “traditions” and “innovations” is evident, and in political and managerial practices implemented on behalf of the state, one or the other component of this dichotomy is often absolutized. The author considers the possibilities of “marrying” traditions and innovations within the public policy agenda in modern societies which are deeply divided on value and socio-cultural grounds, and discusses the viability of such a conjunction. It is argued that the effectiveness of development policies depends on the mutual strengthening of traditions and innovations and on their situational compatibilities. The analysis of development discourses and practices of positive combinations in public policy actors’ activities at the local level reveals the urgent need to promote dialogue on development policy issues between elite and mass groups and within these groups. Finding a combination of continuity and discontinuity in public policy that can meet the public demand for responsible development through the interaction of a competent political class and active civil society, is a priority for implementing effective development policies. This approach is based on the assimilation of traditional values into the social experience of an innovative individual engaged in social creative practices.

Keywords

tradition, innovation, social (societal) development, political development, development discourses, development policies, responsible development, continuity, discontinuity, identity politics, divided societies, innovation champion.

 Full Text

 Alba, C., & Navarro, C. (2011). Administrative tradition and reforms in Spain: adaptation versus innovation. Public Administration, 89(3), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010. 01886.x

Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation “came to be”: tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635-653. https://doi.org/

Berry, B.J.L. (1991). Long-wave rhythms in economic development and political behavior. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bradford, N., & Wolfe, D.A. (2013). Governing regional economic development: innovation challenges and policy learning in Canada. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst006

Edwards-Schacht, M., & Wallace, M.L. (2015). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: six decades defining social innovation. INGENIO (CSIC‐UPV) Working Paper Series. Working Paper Nº 2015-04. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1624.4569

Eisenstadt, Sh.N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1-29.

Fagerberg, J., & Mowery, D.C. (Ed.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001

Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167-198. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167

Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested. The Idea of Innovation over the centuries. London, New York: Routledge.

Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linton, J. (2018). Quiet contributors: the role of the arts, humanities and social sciences in innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 12(3), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.6.12

Mele, V. (2010). Innovation policy in Italy (1993-2002): understanding the invention and persistence of a public management reform. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01478.x

Mensch, G. (1978). Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co.

Phillips, M.S., & Schochet, G. (Ed.) (2004). Questions of tradition.

Phillips, M.S., & Schochet, G. (Ed.) (2004). Questions of tradition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678958

Pye, L.W. (1966). Aspects of political development. Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown and Co.

Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. 3^rd ed. New York, London: The Free Press.

Xiaotong, Fei (2015). Cultural tradition and innovation. In: Fei Xiaotong. Globalization and Cultural Self-Awareness (pp. 231-239). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46648-3 

Akhiezer, A.S. (1998). Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika Rossii). T. II. Teoriya i metodologiya. Slovar' [Russia: criticism of historical experience (sociocultural dynamics of Russia). Vol. II. Theory and methodology. Dictionary]. 2^nd ed. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy hronograf. (In Russ.)

Berdyaev, N.A. (1923). Pis’mo pyatoe. O konservatizme [Letter 5. On conservatism]. In N.A. Berdyaev Filosofiya neravenstva. Pis’ma k nedrugam po sotsialnoy filosofii [Philosophy of inequality. Letters to foes of social philosophy] (pp. 88-101). Berlin: Obelisk. (In Russ.)

Dynkin, A.A., & Ivanova N.I. (Ed.). (2005). Innovatsionnye prioritety gosudarstva [Innovative priorities of the state]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Fedotova, V.G. (2014). Modernization and tradition. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie (Knowledge. Understanding. Skill), 2, 80-91. (In Russ.)

Fedotova, V.G., Kolpakov, V.A., & Fedotova N.N. (2008). Global'nyi kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii [Global capitalism: three great transformations]. Moscow: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. (In Russ.)

Glazychev, V.L. (1998). The idea of the city and technology management of environmental development. Typology of cities. Website in memory of V.L. Glazychev. (In Russ.) http://www.glazychev.ru/courses/1998-10-30_predstavlenie_o_gorode.htm

Glazychev, V.L. (2005). Glubinnaya Rossiya: 2000-2002 [Deep Russia: 2000-2002]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo. (In Russ.)

Gofman, A.B. (1998). Traditsii [Traditions]. In Kul'turologiya. ХХ vek. Ehntsiklopediya [Culturology. XX century. Encyclopedia]. Vol. 2 (pp. 265-266). St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russ.)

Gofman, A.B. (2008). Teoriya traditsii v sotsiologicheskoi traditsii: ot Montesk'e i Berka do Maksa Vebera i Khal'bvaksa [Tradition theory in the sociological tradition: from Montesquieu and Burke to Max Weber and Halbwachs]. In A.B. Gofman (Ed.), Traditsii i innovatsii v sovremennoi Rossii: sotsiologicheskii analiz vzaimodeistviya i dinamiki [Traditions and innovations in contemporary Russia: a sociological analysis of interaction and dynamics] (pp. 68-127). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Gofman, A.B. (2010). In search of a lost identity: traditions, traditionalism and national identity. Scientific Almanac Questions of the Social Theory, 4, 241-254. (In Russ.)

Ivanova, N.I. (2002). Natsional'nye innovatsionnye sistemy [National innovation systems]. Moscow: MAIK “Nauka”. (In Russ.)

Ivanova, N.I. (2016). Innovation policy: theory and practice. World Economy and International Relations, 60(1), 5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-1-5-16

Jessop, B. (2019). The state: past, present, future. (Russ. ed.: Jessop, B. Gosudarstvo: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. Moscow: Delo RANEPA).

Kirsanova, E.G. (2012). Innovations as a political science category. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12. Political Science, 1, 15-24. (In Russ.)

Kolbanovsky, V.V. (2010). “Traditions and innovations in contemporary Russia”: reflections on a collective monograph edited by A.B. Gofman. Sociological Journal, 4, 153-168. (In Russ.)

Kondratiev, N.D. (2002). Bol'shie tsikly kon"yunktury i teoriya predvideniya [The long waves in economic life; Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur]. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russ.)

Lapkin, V.V. (2012). Politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii v global’nom kontekste [Political modernization of Russia in a global changes context]. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russ.)

Levada, Yu.A. (1970). Traditsiya [Tradition]. In F.V. Konstantinov (Ed.), Filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya [Philosophical Encyclopedia]. Vol. 5 (p. 853). Moscow: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. (In Russ.)

Lunkin, R.N., & Filatov, S.B. (2019). Fight “for” and “against” identity in inner political processes: a conflict between “new liberals” and traditionalists. World Economy and International Relations, 63(9), 50-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-50-60

Markaryan, E.S. (1983). Teoriya kul'tury i sovremennaya nauka. Logiko-metodologicheskii analiz [Cultural theory and modern science. Logical and methodological analysis]. Moscow: Mysl'. In Russ.)

Miroshnichenko, I.V., & Morozova, E.V. (2022). Public policy as a space for converting intangible resources into factors of territorial development. Political Science (RU), 3, 144-163. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.03.07

Morozova, E.V. (2011). Innovatsionnaya lichnost' kak sub’’ekt politicheskikh izmenenii [Innovative personality as a subject of political changes]. In A.I. Solovyov (Ed.), Modernizatsiya i politika: traditsii i perspektivy Rossii. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2011 [Modernization and Politics: Traditions and Perspectives of Russia. Political Science. Yearbook 2011] (pp. 207-217). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Pantin, V.I., & Lapkin, V.V. (2006). Filosofiya istoricheskogo prognozirovaniya: Ritmy istorii i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya v pervoi polovine XXI veka [Philosophy of historical forecasting: rhythms of history and prospects of the world development in the first half of the 21^st century]. Dubna: Feniks+. (In Russ.)

Pantin, V.I., & Lapkin, V.V. (2014). Istoricheskoe prognozirovanie v XXI veke: tsikly Kondrat'eva, ehvolyutsionnye tsikly i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiya [Historical forecasting in the 21st сentury: Kondratieff cycles, evolutionary cycles and prospects for world development]. Dubna: Feniks+. (In Russ.)

Pantin, & V.I. (2023). Tsikly i volni istorii: priroda, chelovek, obshchestvo, kul'tura [Cycles and waves of history: nature, man, society and culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Peregudov, S.P., & Semenenko, I.S. (2008). Korporativnoe grazhdanstvo: kontseptsii, mirovaya praktika i rossiiskie realii [Corporate citizenship: concepts, world practice and Russian realities]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publishers. (In Russ.)

Polterovitch, V.M. (2004). Institutional traps and ways out. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 3, 5-16. (In Russ.)

Romanova, A.P. (2015). Traditions and innovations from the perspective of cultural security. Scientific Notes of Crimea Federal V.І. Vernadsky University. Philosophy. Political sciences. Culturology, 1(2), 3-12. (In Russ.)

Round table of the «Polis» journal. Theory and politics of innovative development and the innovations in politics. (2010). Polis. Political Studies, 2, 128-145. (In Russ.)

Schumpeter, J.A. (2007). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter, J.A. Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. In Schumpeter, J.A. Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm, demokratiya (pp. 31-362). Moscow: Eksmo).

Semenenko, I.S. (2019). Horizons of responsible development: from discourse to governance. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 7-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Semenenko, I.S., Lapkin, V.V., & Pantin, V.I. (2021). Social cleavages and political divides in a theoretical perspective: criteria for assessment and classification. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 54-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.05

Sergeev, V.M. (2008). Innovation as a political problem. Politeia, 1, 114-125. (In Russ.)

Solovyov, A.I. (2020). Gosudarstvo: smysly i obrazy [The State: Meanings and Images]. In: Gosudarstvo v politicheskoi nauke i sotsial'noi real'nosti XXI veka [The State in Political Science and Social Reality of the 21st Century]. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko, V.V. Lapkin, V.I. Pantin. Moscow: Ves' Mir. P. 37-62. (In Russ.).

Soloveva, T.S. (2018). Impact of social innovations оn regional development: conceptual framework. Problems of Regional Economy, 3 (36), 81-88. (In Russ.)

Sungurov, A.Yu. (2015). Kak voznikayut politicheskie innovatsii: «fabriki myslI» i drugie instituty-mediatory [How political innovations arise: thought factories and other institutions-mediators]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Suprun, V.I. (Ed.) (2012). Innovatsionnyi chelovek i innovatsionnoe obshchestvo [Innovative man and innovative society]. Novosibirsk: Trendy. (In Russ.)

Sztompka, P. (1996). The sociology of social change. (Russ. ed.: Sztompka, P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nykh izmenenii. Moscow: Aspect Press).

Toynbee, A.J. (2009). The study of history. Vol. I-VI. The geneses, the growths, and the breakdowns of civilizations. (Russ. ed.: Toynbee, A.J. Issledovanie istorii. Vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsii. Moscow: AST).

See also: