The latest foreign policy courses of the PRC in the era of Xi Jinping as a legacy of ancient
Chinese ideas:
interpretations and guidelines
Dikarev A.D.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, andreydikarev@yahoo.com
elibrary_id: 76818 | ORCID: 0000-0002-9888-7708 |
Fan Xuesong,
HSE University, Moscow, Russia, xfan@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 1002025 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3318-2037 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAC-6859-2020
Article received: 2023.03.04. Accepted: 2023.07.12
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.05.07
EDN: LXHQZT
Dikarev A.D., Fan Xuesong The latest foreign policy courses of the PRC in the era of Xi Jinping as a legacy of ancient Chinese ideas: interpretations and guidelines. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.07. EDN: LXHQZT
In the part of the article prepared by A.D. Dikarev, the work was financially supported by MGIMO University, project No. 2025-04-03.
In recent years, especially since Xi Jinping took office as state leader in 2012, the PRC government has been paying increased attention to the influence of traditional Chinese wisdom on diplomacy, and also to the guiding importance of its own culture for foreign policy. In the era of Xi Jinping, the concepts of Confucianism and other ancient Chinese schools of international relations have become the ideological source of the PRC’s international relations strategy. Some of the most visible examples are the “Chinese Dream” and “the correct view on justice and profit.” The most striking of ideas in international relations based on ancient Chinese concepts is the “Community of the Common Destiny for Mankind.” Along with the implementation of these concepts, China’s foreign policy under Xi Jinping entered a new era. According to the PRC leadership and prominent Chinese scholars, Chinese ideas derived from their own ancient culture could bring to the world a new model of modernization and development, differing from Western models.
References
Fairbank, J.K. (Ed.) (1968). The Chinese world order: traditional China’s foreign relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pottinger, M., Johnson, M. & Feith, D. (2022). Xi Jinping in his own words. Foreign Аffairs, November 30. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/xi-jinping-his-own-words
Goncharov, S.N. (2022). Jumping out of the historical cycle and building a new ideology at the twentieth congress of CCP. Far Eastern Studies, 6, 153-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013128120023467-4
Grachikov, E.N. (2021). Kitayskaya schkola mezhdunarodnih otnoshenii: na puti k bol'shim teoriyam [Chinese school of international relations: on the way to big theories]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Kissinger, G. (2014). The world order. (Russ. ed.: Kissinger, G. Mirovoi poryadok. Moscow: AST.
Klassicheskoye konfutsianstvo [Classical Confusianism]. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. Confucius. Lun Yu. (2000). Moscow: Olma Press; St. Petersburg: Neva. (In Russ.)
Lukin, A.V. (1990). Diskussii o roli traditsionnoi kulturi v KNR [Disputes about the role of traditional culture in China]. In 21st Conference “State and Society in China”, Moscow, 1990, vol. 3 (pр. 200-210). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Lukin, A.V. (2023). The concepts of sinification of Marxism, a new form of human civilization and civilization-state in modern Chinese ideological discourse. Russian China Studies, 2, 71-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2023.68.94.004
Tikhvinskiy, S.L. (1959). Dvizhenie za reformi 2022v Kitaye i Kang YouWei [The struggle for reforms in China and Kang Youwei]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura. (In Russ.)
See also:
Lukin A.V.,
«Chinese threat» and duality of consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6
Luzyanin S.G.,
Chinese people’s republic: foreign-policy «transit». Renewal of theory and practice. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No6
Barabanov O.N.,
Italy’s Contemporary Foreign Policy Ideology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Karelova L.B., Chugrov S.V.,
Tu Weiming and the «New Confucianism». – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1
Andreyev A.L.,
Dream and reality in modern Russia: to the problem of analyzing mass motivations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5