Oikophobia and the crisis of modern Western civilization

S.G. Turonok

doi:10.17976/jpps/2024.03.04

Oikophobia and the crisis of modern Western civilization

Turonok S.G.,

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, touronok@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 251896 | RESEARCHER_ID: KGM-1095-2024

Article received: 2023.09.04. Accepted: 2024.02.09

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.03.04
EDN: XSLPKF

Rubric: Theme of the issue: New faces of global politics

For citation:

Turonok S.G. Oikophobia and the crisis of modern Western civilization . – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.04. EDN: XSLPKF (In Russ.)

Abstract

The subject of this article is the phenomenon of oikophobia, which in recent decades has attracted the attention of philosophers, political scientists, sociologists and psychologists who tend to interpret it as the origin of many crisis phenomena affecting the modern Western civilization. The term has been used in political contexts to refer critically to political ideologies that are perceived as responsible for repudiating one's own culture, history, traditions and laud others. The simplest way of defining oikophobia is as the opposite extreme of xenophobia. As xenophobia means the fear or hatred of strangers or foreigners, reversely oikophobia means the fear or hatred of home or one's own society or civilization, oikos being the ancient Greek word for home, house, household. The article reveals the essence and content, characteristic manifestations of oikophobia in its narrow and broad meanings, the historical, cultural and intellectual background and sources of its origin and development. The author identifies signs of oikophobia in a number of key political, philosophical and ideological paradigms and concepts. Based on our findings, we suggest that various manifestations of oikophobia, especially those that may provide the ideological basis for mass protest movements, pose a serious challenge to public policy and government institutions not only in Western countries, but also in Russia. Government bodies and non-governmental organizations involved in the process of policy formulation in the spheres of security, information and education should pay attention to the threats and challenges that government institutions in the USA, Great Britain and a number of other Western countries have already dealt with. In our opinion, one of the most relevant areas of interaction between the Russian government and civil society in the field of countering the manifestations of oikophobia should be formulating general criteria for identifying Russophobia, which could be applied not only in the field of scientific research and educational practices, but also in the field of lawmaking and law enforcement.

Keywords

oikophobia, crisis, tradition, tolerance, multiculturalism, russophobia.

Full Text

References

Beckeld, B. (2022). Western self-contempt: oikophobia in the decline of civilizations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763182.001.0001

Bencivenga, E. (2008). Il pensiero come stile. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.

Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186542

Bobbitt, Ph. (2002). The shield of Achilles: war, peace, and the course of history. New York: Alfred Knopf.

Bruckner, P. (2010). The tyranny of guilt: an essay on Western masochism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834310

Campbell, R.J. (2009). Psychiatric dictionary: the definitive dictionary of psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delgado, R. (1995). Critique of liberalism. In Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Dooley, M. (2009). Roger Scruton: the philosopher on Dover Beach. Continuum.

Galli della Loggia, E. (1998). L’identitd italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.

Grigoriev, S. (2014). Book review: Roger Scruton: the philosopher on Dover Beach. The European Legacy, 19(4), 505-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2014.927222

Hand, M. (2011). Should we promote patriotism in schools? Political Studies, 59(2), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00855.x

Kaufmann, E. (2004). The rise and fall of Anglo-America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kazakova, A. (2018). The creators of oikophobia: to methodology of research of domestic space demonization as pragmatic mass media effect. Media Education, 58(4), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2018.4.39

Keller, S. (2015). The case against patriotism. In J. Kleinig, S. Keller, & I. Primoratz (Ed.), The Ethics of Patriotism: A Debate (pp. 48-72). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260737.ch2

Marcuse, H. (1974). Eros and civilization: a philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

Matsuda, M.J., Lawrence, Ch.R. III, Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K.W. (1994). Words that wound: critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Boulder: Westview Press.

Merry, M. (2020). Critical patriotism. In M. Sardoc (Ed.), Handbook on Patriotism (pp. 163-178). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54484-7_23

Monbiot, G. (2003). The age of consent. London: Flamingo.

Orwell, G. (1941). The lion and the unicorn: Socialism and the English genius. London: Searchlight Books.

Osler, A. (2017). Citizenship education, inclusion and belonging in Europe: rhetoric and reality in England and Norway. In J.A. Banks (Ed.), Citizenship Education and Global Migration: Implications for Theory, Research, and Teaching (pp. 133-160). AERA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv138wrq5.14

Pupo, S. (2015). Oikophobic prejudice against nation in the contemporary political thought. The Italian case. Notizie di Politeia, 31(118), 3-22.

Said, E.W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Said, E.W. (2003). Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.

Scruton, R. (1993). Oikophobia. The Journal of Education, 175(2), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749317500207

Scruton, R. (2004). England and the need for Nations. London: St. Edmundsbury Press.

Southey, R. (1808). Letters from England. London: David Longworth.

Subotnik, D. (1998). What’s wrong with critical race theory: reopening the case for middle class values. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7(3), 1. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol7/iss3/1

Suissa, J. (2021). Oikophobia and not being at home; educational questions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(6), 854-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1743646

Taguieff, A. (2007). Les contre-rdactionnaires: Le progressisme entre illusion et imposture. Paris: Denoel.

Utekhin, I.V. (2003). Toward a semiotic analysis of ‘dwelling place paranoids’. In E. Tarasti (Ed.), Understanding/Misunderstanding. Contribution to the Study of the Hermeneutics of Signs (pp. 522-527). Acta Semiotica Fennica XVI. Helsinki: Semiotic Society of Finland.

Williams, P. (1997). The Rooster’s egg: on the persistence of prejudice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Marcuse, H. (1994). One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society.(Russ. ed.: Marcuse, H. Odnomernyi chelovek: Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial’nogo obshchestva. Moscow: REFL-book).

Medvedev, A.V. (1990). Household and hallucinatory disorders in late psychoses occurring with the picture of “housing paranoia”. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 9, 62-66. (In Russ.)

Shal’nev, V.A. (2006). Problemy vzaimodeistviya obshchestva i prirody: vzglyad geografa [Problems of interaction between society and nature: a geographer’s view]. Stavropol: SSU. (In Russ.)

Touronok, S.G. (2023). Kriticheskaya rasovaya teoriya [The critical race theory]. In Politologiya. Novyi Leksikon [Political Science. New Lexicon] (pp. 10-20). Moscow: Aspetl Press. (In Russ.)

Content No. 3, 2024