print

On the metaphor “revolutions are the locomotives of history”

Kapustin B.G.,

HSE University, Moscow, Russia, boriskapustin1951@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 337381 | ORCID: 0000-0003-4076-9466 | RESEARCHER_ID: M-4580-2016

Article received: 2024.01.27. Accepted: 2024.02.29 10:43


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.03.05
EDN: HPOOIN

Rubric: Theory and methodology of political studies

For citation:

Kapustin B.G. On the metaphor “revolutions are the locomotives of history”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.05. EDN: HPOOIN (In Russ.)

Abstract

The question about the relationship between revolution and progress is the centerpiece of this essay. A specific solution to this question is expressed by a well-known metaphor invented by Marx - “revolutions are the locomotives of history”. The rendering of this metaphor in the language of theory uncovers certain ambiguities and tensions inherent in it, some of which are caused by a collision of positivist-evolutionist and dialectical-revolutionist strands of Marx's thought. The actual revolutions of the twentieth century turned these tensions into political reality. Progress is a form of social development which converts history into evolution removing the former's open-endedness and the variability of the trajectories of societal movement, which is precisely what distinguishes history from evolution. However tragic the concrete manifestation of a revolution can be, it interrupts the progress-as-evolution and restores, at least for the time being, history as history. Thus, Walter Benjamin's metaphor of revolution as an attempt undertaken by the passengers on the train of progress to “activate the emergency brake”, all its own ambiguities notwithstanding, offers a much more adequate image of the relationship between revolution and progress.

Keywords

progress, evolution, revolution, history, continuity and discontinuity, production, agency of production, political agency, harmony and disharmony of historical tasks and the conditions of their accomplishment, freedom and necessity..

 Full Text

Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: Verso.

Benjamin, W. (2006). Paralipomena to “On the concept of history”. In Selected Writings (pp. 401-411). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Comninel, G.C. (2003). Historical materialist sociology and revolutions. In G. Delanty, & E.F. Isin (Ed.), Handbook of Historical Sociology (pp. 85-95). London: Sage.

Franklin, U.M. (1999). The real world of technology. Revised Edition. Toronto: Anansi Press Inc.

Gouldner, A.W. (1974). Marxism and social theory. Theory and Society, 1(4), 387-414.

Gouldner, A.W. (1980). The two Marxisms: contradictions and anomalies in the development of theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Hindess, B., & Hirst, P.Q. (1975). Routledge revivals: pre-capitalist modes of production. London: Routledge.

Hindess, B., & Hirst, P.Q. (1977). Mode ofproduction and social formation: an auto-critique ofpre-capitalist modes of production. London: Macmillan.

Koselleck, R. (2002). 'Progress' and ‘decline': an appendix to the history of two concepts. In The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts (pp. 218-235). Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619104-015

Koselleck, R., & Richter, M. (2006). Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67 (2), 357-400. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2006.0013

Kumar, K. (1989). Revolution: history's Cheshire cat. History Workshop Journal, 27(1), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/27.1.179

Lowenthal, R. (2021). The ‘missing revolution’ in industrial societies: comparative reflections on a German problem. In V.R. Berghahn, & M. Kitchen (Ed.), Germany in the Age of Total War (pp. 218-235). London; New York: Routledge; Croom Helm.

Lowy, M. (1985). Revolution against ‘progress’: Walter Benjamin’s romantic anarchism. New Left Review, 1(152), 42-59.

Lowy, M. (2000). Marx’s dialectic of progress: closed or open. Socialism and Democracy, 14(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300008428253

Offe, C. (1988). Technology and one-dimensionality: a version of the technocracy thesis? In R.B. Pippin, A. Feenberg, & C.P. Webel (Ed.), Marcuse: Critical Theory and the Promise of Utopia (pp. 215-225). South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

Shumway, D.R. (2006). Marxism without Revolution: Towards a History ofDiscouragement. Symploke, 14(1-2), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1353/sym.2007.0038

Stanley, J. (1972). Translator’s introduction. In G. Sorel (Ed.), The Illusion of Progress (pp. ix-xxxix). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Townshend, J. (1998). The politics of Marxism: the critical debates. London: Leicester University Press.

Traverso, E. (2021). Revolution: an intellectual history. London: Verso.

Arendt, H. (2011). On revolution. (Russ. ed.: Arendt, H. O revolyutsii. Moscow: Evropa publishing).

Bernshtein, E. (1906). Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie. (Russ. ed.: Bernshtein, E. Usloviya vozmozhnosti sotsializma i zadachi sotsial-demokratii. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiya A.A. Gol’dberga).

Durrenmatt, F. (1998). Romulus der Grosse. (Russ. ed.: Durrenmatt, F. Romul Velikii. In Durrenmatt, F Collected Works in 5 vol. Vol. 4 (pp. 5-74). Khar'kov; Moscow: Folio-Progress.)

Engels, F (1955). Grundsatze des Kommunismus. (Russ. ed.: Engels, F Piintsipy kommunizma. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 4 (pp. 322-339). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Engels, F. (1961a). Herrn Eugen Duhrings Umwalzung der Wissenschaft. (Russ. ed.: Engels, F. Anti-Dyuring. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 20 (pp. 5-338). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Engels, F. (1961b). Brief an Vera Sasulich in Genf. 23. April 1885. (Russ. ed.: Engels, F. Pis'mo Vere Ivanovne Zasulich v Zhenevu. 23 aprelya 1885 g. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 36 (pp. 259-264). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Freyer, H. (2009). Die Revolution von rechts. (Russ. ed.: Freyer, H. Revolyutsiya sprava. Moscow: Praxis).

Guizot, F (2000). Des moyens de gouvernement et d’opposition dans l’dtat actuel de la France. (Russ. ed.: Guizot, F. O sredstvakh pravleniya i oppozitsii v sovremennoi FrantsiI. In M.M. Fedorova (ed.), Klassicheskii frantsuzskii liberalism (pp. 263-490). Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Guizot, F (2007). Histoire gdndrale de la civilisation en Europe. (Russ. ed.: Guizot, F Istoriya tsivilizatsii v Evrope. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego).

Gutorov, V.A. (2018). Progress and politics: the modern philosophical aporias and dilemmas. Political Expertise: Politex, 14(2), 4-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu23.2018.201

Hegel, G.W.F. (1974). Encyklopadie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. 1. Wissenschaft der Logik. (Russ. ed.: Hegel, G.W.F. Ehntsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. Vol. 1. Nauka logiki. Moscow: Mysl’).

Kapustin, B. (2019). Rassuzhdeniya o “kontse revolyutsii” [Discussions about the “end of the revolution”]. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press. (In Russ.)

Kautsky, K. (1931). Die materialistische Geschichtsauffassung. (Russ. ed.: Kautsky, K. Materialisticheskoe ponimanie istorii. Vol. 2. Gosudarstvo i razvitie chelovechestva. Moscow; Leningrad: Izdateltsvo sotsialno- ekonomicheskoi literatury).

Kelle, V., & Koval’zon, M. (1969). Kurs istoricheskogo materializma [Course of historical materialism]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.)

Koselleck, R. (2014). Einleitung. (Russ. ed.: Koselleck, R. Vvedenie. In Slovar' osnovnykh istoricheskikh ponyatii. Izbrannye stat'i. T. 1 (pp. 23-44). Moscow: New Literary Observer).

Krikh, S.B. (2017). “Slave revolution” and peripheral historiography. Vestnik drevney istorii, 77(4), 1019-1024. (In Russ.)

Krylov, V.V. (1997). Osobennosti razvitiya proizvoditel’nykh sil i vosproizvodstvennogo protsessa v razvivayushchikhsya stranakh [Features of the development of productive forces and the reproduction process in developing countries]. In Krylov, V.V. Teoriya formatsii [Formation theory] (pp. 88-112). Moscow: Izdatel’skaya firma “Vostochnaya literatura”. (In Russ.)

Lenin, V.I. (1970). O nashei revolyutsiI (po povodu zapisok N. Sukhanova) [About our revolution (regarding the notes of N. Sukhanov)]. In Lenin, V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Izdanie pyatoe [Full composition of writings. Fifth edition] . Vol. 45 (pp. 378-382). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury. (In Russ.)

Lenin, V.I. (1974). Doklad na I Vserossiiskom s”ezde trudovogo kazachestva 1.03.1920 [Report at the first all-russian congress of labor Cossacks on March 1, 1920]. In Lenin, V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Izdanie pyatoe [Full composition of writings. Fifth edition]. Vol. 40 (pp. 166-187). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury.

Lyublinskaia, A.D. (Ed.). (1978). Istoriya v “Ehntsiklopedii” Didro i D’Alambera [History in the Encyclopedia of Diderot and D’Alembert]. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Malia, M. (2015). History’s locomotives. Revolutions and the making of the modern world. (Russ. ed.: Malia, M. Lokomotivy istorii. Revolyutsii i stanovlenie sovremennogo mira. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Marcuse, H. (1994). One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. (Russ. ed.: Marcuse, H. Odnomernyi chelovek. Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial’nogo obshchestva. Moscow: REFL-book).

Marx, K. (1955a). Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. K kritike gegelevskoi filosofii prava. Vvedenie. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 1 (pp. 219-368). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1955b). Das Elend der Philosophie. Antwort auf Proudhons “Philosophie des Elends”. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Nishcheta filosofii. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 4 (pp. 65-185). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury.

Marx, K. (1956). Die Klassenkampfe in Frankreich 1848 bis 1850. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Klassovaya bor’ba vo Frantsii s 1848 po1850 g. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 7 (pp. 5-110). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1959). Zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie. Vorwort. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. K kritike politicheskoi ekonomii. Predislovie. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 13 (pp. 5-9). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1960). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischwn Oekonomie. Vol. 1. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Kapital. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 20 (pp. 5-900). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1961). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischwn Oekonomie. Vol. 3. Part 1. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Kapital. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 25. Part 1. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1962a). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischwn Oekonomie. Vol. 3. Part 2. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Kapital. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 25. Part 2. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1962b). Brief an Joseph Weydemeyer, 5. Marz 1852. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Pis’mo Iosifu Veidemeieru, 5 marta 1852 g. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 28 (pp. 422-428). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1968a). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Okonomie. Part 1. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857-1859 godov. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 46. Part 1. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K. (1968b). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Okonomie. Part 1. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857-1859 godov. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 46. Part 2. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955a). Die heilige Familie, oder Kritik der kritischen Kritik. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Svyatoe semeistvo. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 2 (pp. 1-338). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955b). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. (Russ. ed.: Marx, K. Manifest Kommunisticheskoi partii. In K. Marx, & F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 4 (pp. 419-459). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury).

Musil, R. (1994). Der Mann Ohne Eigenschaften. (Russ. ed.: Musil, R. Chelovek bez svoistv. Kn. 1. Moscow: Ladomir).

Ostrovityanov, K.V., Shepilov, D.T., Leont’ev, L.A., Laptev, I.D., Kuz’minov, I.I., & Gatovskii, L.M. (1954). Politicheskaya ehkonomiya [Political economy]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury. (In Russ.)

Paine, Th. (1959). Common sence. (Russ. ed.: Paine, Th. Zdravyi smysl. In Paine, Th. Selected Works (pp. 21-64). Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House).

Pletnikov, Yu.K. (2010). Proizvoditel’nye sily i proizvodstvennye otnosheniya [Productive forces and production relations]. In Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya [New philosophical encyclopedia]. In 4 vol. Vol. 3 (p. 362). Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russ.)

Polanyi, K. (2002). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. (Russ. ed.: Polanyi, K. Velikaya transformatsiya. Politicheskie i ehkonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni. St. Petersburg: Aletheia).

Rabinovitch, E.G. (2018). “The revolution of slaves”: a brief history of myth. Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology, 22(2), 1098-1131. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152280

Schumpeter, J. (1995). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter, J. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. Moscow: Economizdat).

Smith, A. (1962). An inquiry into the nature and causes ofthe wealth ofnations. (Russ. ed.: Smith, A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Moscow: Publishing house of socio-economic literature).

Spinoza, B. (1999). Ethica: Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata et in Quinque Partes Distincta. (Russ. ed.: Spinoza, Ehtika. In Sochineniya. T. 1. St. Petersburg: Nauka).

Stalin, I.V. (1951). Rech’ na Pervom Vsesoyuznom s”ezde kolkhoznikov-udarnikov 19 fevralya 1933 goda [Speech at the First all-union congress of collective farmers-shock workers on February 19, 1933]. In Stalin, I.V. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 13 (pp. 236-256). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury. (In Russ.)

Sycheva, S.G. (2000). Problema simvola v filosofii [The problem of symbol in philosophy]. Tomsk: Tomsk University Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Trotsky, L.D. (1926). Karl Kautskii [Karl Kautsky]. In Trotskii, L.D. Works. Vol. 8 (pp. 44-48). Moscow; Leningrad: State Publishing House of the RSFSR. (In Russ.)

Trotsky, L. (1997). The history of the Russian Revolution. (Russ. ed.: Trotskii, L.D. Istoriya russkoi revolyutsii. In 2 vol. Vol. 2. Part 2. Moscow: TERRA; Respublika. (In Russ.)

Weber, M. (1990). Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. (Russ. ed.: Weber, M. Protestantskaya ehtika i dukh kapitalizma. In Weber, M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya (pp. 61-272). Moscow: Progress Publishers). 

See also: