print

Party-political dynamics in Norway as a factor in Russian-Norwegian relations

Chistikov M.N.,

HSE University, Moscow, Russia, mchistikov@hse.ru

elibrary_id: 1137483 | ORCID: 0009-0006-1212-5080 | RESEARCHER_ID: KMY-6132-2024

Article received: 2023.09.14 10:26. Accepted: 2024.02.07 10:27


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.04.04
EDN: WBFXOQ

Rubric: Theme of the issue: Russia in foreign and domestic political projections

For citation:

Chistikov M.N. Party-political dynamics in Norway as a factor in Russian-Norwegian relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.04.04. EDN: WBFXOQ (In Russ.)

The study was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation № 24-28-00278, https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-00278/.

Abstract

The relations between Russia and Norway are of a contradictory nature, containing both positive and negative elements. In the scientific literature, the systemic factors affecting Russian-Norwegian relations are well studied, while the internal political reasons for the transformation of bilateral relations are insufficiently explored. In 2013, i.e. before the international political crisis of 2014, a number of studies noted the cooling of relations between Russia and Norway. At the same time, a center-right coalition came to power in Norway in 2013. The empirical base of the study consists of texts of debates in the Norwegian parliament and program documents of Norwegian parties. The article analyzed the collected data quantitatively and qualitatively. The main method of the quantitative analysis was a targeted sentiment analysis. As a result of the quantitative analysis, it was found that the parties in the center-left ruling coalition had a more positive stance towards Russia than the parties in the center-right coalition. On the basis of this qualitative analysis, three main factors determining the position of one or another party in relation to Russia were identified. First, the view of Norway’s position within the framework of Russia-NATO and Russia-EU relations, which reflects the party’s opinion about Norway’s place in the system of international relations. Secondly, the value content of relations with Russia, which is connected with the ideology of party representatives and the presence of positive historical experience. Thirdly, the assessment of Russia as a threat to Norway’s security. As a result, it was found that the left-wing parties are generally more inclined to consider Norway as a more autonomous and independent actor in relation to the EU and NATO than the right parties. This is due to the positive experience of the left parties in their interaction with Russia, as well as the higher level of importance of development issues in the northern regions of Norway. For right-wing parties, liberal values play an important role in the context of relations with Russia. In addition, they are more inclined to view Russia as a threat to Norway’s security than the center-left and center-right parties.

Keywords

Norway, party system, neoclassical realism, sentiment analysis, international relations.

Дополнительные материалы

Приложение

 Full Text

Alllern, E.H., Heidar, K., & Karlsen, R. (2015). After the mass party: continuity and change in political parties and representation in Norway. Lexington Books.

Aylott, N., Blomgren, M., & Bergman, T. (2013). Norway: strong yet marginalised parties. In Political Parties in Multi-Level Polities: The Nordic Countries Compared (pp. 119-150). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bhagwat, J., & Rogachev, I. (2023). Cooperation between Russia and Norway: strengthening dialogue in the Arctic. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 28(3), 128-136. https://www.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2023.3.12

Christensen, T.J. (1996). Useful adversaries: grand strategy, domestic mobilization, and Sino-American conflict, 1947-1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Filipović, A. (2020). The influence of right-wing populist parties on the national policies towards the Russian Federation: the case of the Progress Party (Norway) and the Danish People’s Party. SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 1-35. https://www.doi.org/10.25136/1339-3057.2020.1.32373

Goldstein J., &Keohane R.O. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Cornell University Press.

Hamborg, F., & Donnay, K. (2021). NewsMTSC: a dataset for (multi-)target-dependent sentiment classification in political news articles. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics (pp. 1663-1675). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Henriksen, T., & Ulfstein, G. (2011). maritime Delimitation in the Arctic: the Barents Sea treaty. Ocean Development & International Law, 42(1-2), 1-21. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2011.542389.

Hønneland, G. (2013). Hvordan skal Putin ta Barentshavet tilbake? Trondheim: Akademika forlag.

Jervis, R. (2017). Perception and misperception in international politics: new edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jørgensen, J.H. (2013). Hvor normalt kan Svalbard bli? Et lite stykke Russland i møte med norsk forvaltning. Nordisk Østforum, 27(4), 327-351.

Jupskås, A.R., & Langsæther, P.E. (2023). Norway. The Palgrave Handbook of Radical Left Parties in Europe (pp. 423-447). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kitchen, N. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 117-143. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990532

Kunz, D., & Saltzman, I.Z. (2012). External and domestic determinants of state behaviour. In Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In (pp. 96-116). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Mouritzen, H. (2019). Fire nordiske Ruslands-relationer. På vej mod en fællesnordisk Ruslands-politik efter Krim og Trump? Internasjonal Politikk, 77(2), 197-222. https://www.doi.org/10.23865/intpol.v77.1319

Østhaen, A., & Rottem, S.V. (2020). Stormaktspolitikk og økt spenning? Kunsten å skille mellom is og bart i Arktis. Internasjonal Politikk, 78(4), 466-477. https://www.doi.org/10.23865/intpol.v78.2379

Østhagen, A. (2016). High North, low politics – maritime cooperation with Russia in the Arctic. Arctic Review, 7(1), 83-100. https://www.doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.255

Østhagen, A. (2018). Managing conflict at sea: the case of Norway and Russia in the Svalbard Zone. Arctic Review, 9, 100-123. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v9.1084

Ripsman, N M., Taliaferro, J.W., & Lobell, S.E. (2016). Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899234.001.0001

Rowe, L. (2018). Fornuft og følelser: Norge og Russland etter Krim. Nordisk Østforum, 32, 1-20. https://www.doi.org/10.23865/noros.v32.1037

Rowe, L. (2010). Hønneland G. Norge og Russland: Tilbake til normaltilstanden. Nordisk Østforum, 24(2), 133-147.

Taliaferro, J.W., Ripsman, N.M., & Lobell, S.E. (2012). The challenge of grand strategy: the great powers and the broken balance between the world wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tufte, G. (2023). Why active state measures have dominated regional policies in Norway by governments of all colours: a historical review and comparison with Sweden. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 14, 257-276. https://www.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v14.5090

Vylegzhanin, A.N., Young, O.R., & Berkman, P.A. (2018). Governing the Barents Sea region: current status, emerging issues, and future options. Ocean Development & International Law, 49(1), 52-78. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2017.1365545

Wilhelmsen, J.M., & Gjerde, K.L. (2018). Norway and Russia in the Arctic: new cold war contamination? Arctic Review, 9, 382-407. https://www.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v9.1334

Wilson Rowe, E. (2018). Arctic governance: power in cross-border cooperation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.


Chistikov, M.N., & Shuranova, A.A. (2022). International Regimes as a factor of interstate bilateral relations (the case of Russia and Norway). E-Journal Public Administration, 95, 175-191. (In Russ.)

Heier, T. (2020). Et farligere Norge? (Russ. ed.: Heier T. Norvegiya mezhdu SSHA i Rossiyey. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole).

Lukin, Y.F. (2011). The contract between Russia and Norway – a step to peaceful repartition of Arctic Sea space. Arctic and North, 2, 59-96. (In Russ.)

Melkov, G.M. (2010). Legal review of agreement between Russia and Norway. Rybnyye resursy, 4, 10-13. (In Russ.)

Østhagen, A., Jørgensen, А.-К., & Moe, A. (2020). The Svalbard fisheries protection zone: how Russia and Norway manage an Arctic dispute. Arctic and North, 40, 183-205. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.183

Portsel, A.K. (2011). Dispute about Spitsbergen: the issue hasn’t been settled yet. Arctic and North, 3, 42-62. (In Russ.)

Poval, L.M. (2012). Russian-Norwegian agreement about the division of the Arctic space. Arctic and North, 6, 118-143. (In Russ.)

Skripka, I.R. (2021a). The impact of social media on the election campaign in storting 2021. Nauchnoanaliticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 6, 59-67. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran620215967

Skripka, I.R. (2021b). Results of parliamentary elections in Norway. Analitycal papers of IE RAS, 3(23), 38-43. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.15211/analytics32520213843

Skripka, I.R. (2023). The Norway’s policy in the context of the Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine. Sovremennaya Evropa, 6, 59-58. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.31857/S0201708323060050

Stepanov, I.A., Smolovik, E.V., & Kazakovtseva, A.A. (2022). The international dimension of Norwegian Arctic policy and the accumulated capital of Russian-Norwegian cooperation. Arctic and North, 49, 125-151. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2022.49.125

Zilanov, V.K. (2017). Delimitation between Russia and Norway in the Arctic: new challenges and cooperation, Arctic and North, 29, 28-56. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.29.28

See also: