print

World order transformation:
economy, ideology, technology

Dynkin A.A. ,

Doctor of Economics, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, dynkin@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 71505 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4183-914X | RESEARCHER_ID: G-3791-2017

Article received: 2024.07.05 14:24. Accepted: 2024.07.25 14:25


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.05.02
EDN: ETDUKS

Rubric: We in the world, the world in us

For citation:

Dynkin A.A. World order transformation: economy, ideology, technology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.05.02. EDN: ETDUKS (In Russ.)

This article was prepared with the support of a grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for major scientific projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development No. 075-15-2024-551 “Global and regional centers of power in the emerging world order”. The author expresses gratitude to his colleagues at IMEMO RAS R.I. Kapelyushnikov, V.D. Milovidov, I.S. Semenenko, I.V. Danilin, S.V. Zhukov, K.V. Bogdanov, A.P, Guchanova for consultations and assistance in preparing the article.

Abstract

The article considers macro-trends and short-term trends in the transformation of the world order. The author introduces the classification of international relations systems and proposes an interpretation of the patterns according to which they change. The author evaluates the historical dynamics of the balance of economic and military power of states, the influence of technological progress, demographic trends, and ideologies on the architecture of the upcoming post-unipolar world order. Its contours are determined by a contradictory set of factors leading towards multipolarity but also a new bipolarity.

Keywords

world order, systems of international relations, technological progress, demographic trends, ideology, aggregate productivity factor, polycentrism (multipolarity), new bipolarity.

 Full Text    Text of article_(in English)

Buchs, M., & Koch, M. (2017). Critiques of growth. In M. Buchs, & M. Koch. Postgrowth and Wellbeing: Challenges to Sustainable Welfare (pp. 39-56). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59903-8_4

Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory. An introduction. New York: New York University Press.

Graham, T. (2023). Getting Russia right. UK: Polity Books.

Huntington, S.P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1993-06-01/clash-civilizations

Jaishankar, S. (2020). The India way: strategies for an uncertain world. New Delhi; New York: Harper Collins Publishers India.

Kupchan, C. (2021). Bipolarity is back: why it matters. The Washington Quarterly, 44(4), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.2020457

Yan Xuetong. (2016). Political leadership and power redistribution. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow002

Dynkin, A.A. (2020). International turbulence and Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 90(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1134/S101933162002001X.

Primakov, E.M. (1996). Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya nakanune XXI veka: problemy, perspektivy [International Relations on the eve of 21^st century: problems, prospects]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn', 10, 3-13. (In Russ.)

Semenenko, I.S. (2023). Razdelyonnye obshchestva [Divided societies]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost': lichnost', obshchestvo, politika. Novye kontury issledovatel'skogo polya [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. New Outlines of the Research Field] (pp. 27-35). Moscow: Ves' Mir. (In Russ.) https:// www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2023/Identichnost-Semenenko-2023.pdf

See also: