Responsible urban development policy: criteria, subjects, prospects

Responsible urban development policy:
criteria, subjects, prospects


Bardin A.L.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, andreybardin@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 684500 | ORCID: 0000-0001-9526-9763 |

Pantin V.I.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, v.pantin@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 74145 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4218-4579 | RESEARCHER_ID: K-5736-2017

Article received: 2024.06.17 13:39. Accepted: 2024.08.10 13:39


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.05.07
EDN: PPZZAP


For citation:

Bardin A.L., Pantin V.I. Responsible urban development policy: criteria, subjects, prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.05.07. EDN: PPZZAP (In Russ.)



Abstract

This article examines the primary directions of contemporary urban development policy, along with the issues and contradictions associated with its scientific research and practical implementation. The study aims to conceptualize the concept of “responsible urban development” as a complex of approaches and practices that hold promise for integration into practical urban and regional development policies, and to typologize potential approaches to implementing such policies. The authors use an institutional approach, the methodology of identity studies, the structural-functional approach and a case study. The article investigates quantitative and qualitative indicators, the key challenges and tasks of urban development policy, with a particular focus on the resources of modern urban development. The authors note that relying on a limited set of indicators does not provide the capacity for decision-making necessary to update and transform urban development policy to ensure its ability to promptly and flexibly respond to the numerous problems and challenges arising under conditions of socio-political instability. The article addresses and analyses several cases of contemporary urban development and the implementation of corresponding policies. Based on this analysis, the authors conclude that one of the central and most pressing issues in the policy of responsible urban development and the socio-political dynamics of cities is the inefficiency of the communication process between civil actors and stakeholders, on the one hand, and city authorities and the city administration, on the other. This communication deficit can only be partially addressed through digitalization, as the primary obstacles to improved communication are administrative barriers and the dominance of the interests of certain groups, such as large corporations and financial institutions.

Keywords
policy of development, urban development, responsible development, development actors, development resources, urban governance, urban conflicts, digitalization.


References

Fleming, J. (2013). Young people’s participation - where next? Children & Society, 27, 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00442.x

Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. Scribner.

Hovik, S., Giannoumis, G.A., Reichborn-Kjennerud, L., Ruano, J.M., McShane, I., & Legard, S. (Ed.). (2022). Citizen participation in the information society. Comparing participatory channels in urban development. Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7

Lavalle, A., & Barone, S.L. (2019). Councils, associations, and inequality. In Arretche, M. (Ed.), Paths of Inequality in Brazil: A Half-Century of Changes (pp. 25-44). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_2

Mitlin, D., & Bartlett, S. (2018). Editorial: Co-production — key ideas. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818791931

Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1086/226311

Sant, E., & Davies, I. (2018). Promoting participation at a time of social and political turmoil: what is the impact of children's and young people's city councils? Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1337719

UN Habitat (2022). The Global Urban Monitoring Framework. A Guide for urban monitoring of SDGs and NUA and other urban-related thematic or local, national and global frameworks. URL: https://unhabitat.org/the-global-urban-monitoring-framework (accessed 10.10.2023).

Boykova, M., Ilina, I., & Salazkin, M. (2016). The smart city approach as a response to emerging challenges for urban development. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(3), 65-75. (In Russ.)

Drobysheva, T.V., & Emelyanova, T.P. (2020). Viability of urban residents: content of the concept, theoretical and empirical possibilities of its application. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 9, 3, 232-240. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-3-232-240

Emelyanova, T.P., Vikentieva, E.N., Shibayeva, L.V., & Khokhlova, N.I. (2022). Viability resources of urban dwellers: the experience of comparing two cities. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 11, 4, 328-339. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-4-328-339.

Gladkikh, N. (Ed.). (2019). Resursy razvitiya malykh territorii [Development resources for small territories]. Moscow: Delo RANEPA. (In Russ.)

Glazychev, V.L. (2008). Urbanistika [Urbanism]. Moscow: Evropa. (In Russ.)

Ilyina, I.N., & Kohno, M. (2023). Transformatsiya podkhodov k razvitiyu “umnogo goroda” [Transformation of approaches to the development of a “smart city”]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2579-1

Karpova, O. (Ed.). (2023). Rossiiskie regional'nye stolitsy. Razvitie, osnovannoe na kul'ture [Russian regional capitals. Culture-led development]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)

Lappo, G.M. (2019). Diversity of cities as a factor of Russia's successful spatial development. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 4, 3-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587-5566201943-23

Larichev, A.A. (2019). Local communities in cities as a subject of control over solving local issues. Law Enforcement Review, 3(1), 100-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(1).100-107

Meteleva, E.R. (2011). Introducing clarity into content of “city”, “urban development” and “management of urban development” concepts. Izvestiya Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii, 3, 160-164. (In Russ.)

Petukhov, R.V., Sudomoina, O.V., Lapin, G.A., Tutynin, A.A., & Yakovlev, G.I. (2020). Genii mesta: opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya [Genius loci: effort of the empirical research]. In Gorodskie issledovaniya: teoriya i praktika [Urban Research: Theory and Practice] (pp. 267-283). Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.)

Popov, E.V., & Semyachkov, K.A. (2020). Systematisation of approaches to assessing the development of smart cities. Economy of Regions, 16(1), 14-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-l-2

Semenenko, I.S. (2019). Horizons of responsible development: from discourse to governance. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 7-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Sosnin, D.P. (Ed.). (2021). Goroda budushchego: prostranstvennoe razvitie, souchastvuyushchee upravlenie i tvorcheskie industrii [Cities of the future: spatial development, co-development, and creative industries] Moscow: Delo RANEPA. (In Russ.)

Vendina, O.I. (2006). Development strategies for the largest cities in Russia: search for conceptual solutions. Project Baikal, 9, 9-15. (In Russ.)

Voloshinskaya, A.A., & Komarov, V.M. (2015). Evidence-based policy: problems and prospects. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, 90-102. (In Russ.)

Vovlechenie gorozhan v razvitie gorodskoi sredy: itogi, tekhnologii, perspektivy [Involving citizens in the development of the urban environment: results, technologies, prospects]. (2023). Moscow: Project Group 8. (In Russ.)

Zelentsova, E.V., & Gladkikh, N.V. (2021). Tvorcheskie industrii: teorii i praktiki [Creative industries: theory and practice]. Moscow: Т8 RUGRAM. (In Russ.)

Zelentsova, E.V., & Sachkova, E.A. (2020). Creative industries in the context of city development. In Gorodskie issledovaniya: teoriya i praktika [Urban Research: Theory and Practice] (pp. 81-97). Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.)

Content No. 5, 2024

See also:


Semenenko I.S.,
Horizons of Responsible Development: from Discourse to Governance. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No3

Semenenko I.S.,
Tradition and innovation in politics and in development policies: dialectics of compatibility. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No5

Mikhaylenok O.M., Nazarenko A.V.,
Public Policy, Development and Institutions: Semantic Conjugation Logic and “Forgotten Things” in a New Being Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No1

Makarenko B.I.,
Unfinished chronicle. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Galkin A.A., Nikovskaya L.I., Krasin Yu.A., Pantin V.I., Veber A.B., Danilevich I.V., Podyachev K.V., Patrushev S.V., Fadeyeva L.A., Kuryukin A.N., Glukhova A.V., Lapkin V.V.,
Theory and politics of innovative development and the innovations in politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991