print

A decisive factor? Pro-government external interventions in civil wars

Abdeeva D.P.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, d.abdeeva@inno.mgimo.ru

ORCID: 0009-0007-6899-2439 |

Article received: 2024.04.07 19:36. Accepted: 2024.07.15 19:36


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.06.08
EDN: KDLZLU

Rubric: Orbis terrarium

For citation:

Abdeeva D.P. A decisive factor? Pro-government external interventions in civil wars. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.06.08. EDN: KDLZLU (In Russ.)

The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-18-00723, https://rscf.ru/ project/22-18-00723/. This research would not have been possible without the support of I. Istomin. For helpful comments on an earlier draft, the author is indebted to I. Bolgova, M. Suchkov, M. Kharkevich, V. Vinogradov, M. Kucherov, and I. Khludov.

Abstract

Civil wars have been the most prevalent type of armed conflicts post-World War II. Despite the internal nature of such conflicts, foreign assistance is frequently provided to one of the parties involved, with official governments being the most frequent beneficiaries. This study employs extensive empirical evidence to analyze how external involvement in support of government forces influences the outcome of civil wars. Drawing on the bargaining model of war, a civil war is portrayed as a continuous process where the parties constantly reassess their chances of success based on individual battle outcomes. One-sided foreign intervention complicates this evaluation by exacerbating power and information asymmetries inherent to internal conflicts, leading to increased uncertainty about the opponent’s capabilities and intentions, as well as doubts about their ability to credibly commit to peace agreements. Using Cox proportional hazards model, the author finds that external pro-government support primarily serves to sustain the recipient’s ability to continue fighting rather than significantly enhance its chances of victory in a civil war. Furthermore, the impact of such support varies depending on the type of intervention: indirect assistance is associated with a reduced likelihood of the opposition prevailing, whereas direct military intervention does not have a statistically significant influence on the outcome.

Keywords

civil war, internal armed conflict, foreign intervention, military aid, bargaining model of war, Cox proportional hazards model, survival analysis.

Gleditsch, N.P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: a new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615-637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039005007

Harrell, F.E. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Springer International Publishing.

Heinkelmann-Wild, T., & Mehrl, M. (2022). Indirect governance at war: delegation and orchestration in rebel support. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027211027311

Jones, B.T. (2017). Altering capabilities or imposing costs? Intervention strategy and civil war outcomes. International Studies Quarterly, 61(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw052

Karldn, N. (2023). Escalate to de-escalate? External state support and governments’ willingness to negotiate. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(8), 1323-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1835002

King, G., Keohane, R.O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kreutz, J. (2010). How and when armed conflicts end: introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47(2), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309353108

Lee Ray, J. (2003). Explaining interstate conflict and war: what should be controlled for? Conflict Management and Peace Science, 20(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/073889420302000201

Lektzian, D., & Regan, P.M. (2016). Economic Sanctions, Military Interventions, and Civil Conflict Outcomes. Journal of Peace Research, 53(4), 554-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316638714

Licht, A.A. (2011). Change comes with time: substantive interpretation of nonproportional hazards in event history analysis. Political Analysis, 19(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq039

Licklider, R. (1995). The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945-1993. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082982

Little, R. (1975). Intervention: external involvement in civil wars. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Maoz, Z., & San Akca, B. (2012). Rivalry and state support of non-state armed groups (NAGs), 1946-2001. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 720-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00759.x

Mason, T.D., Weingarten, J.P., & Fett, P.J. (1999). Win, lose, or draw: predicting the outcome of civil wars. Political Research Quarterly, 52(2), 239-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/449218

McKibben, H.E., & Skoll, A. (2021). Please help us (or don’t): external interventions and negotiated settlements

in civil conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65(2-3), 480-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720950417

Mehrl, M., & Thurner, P.W. (2020). Military technology and human loss in intrastate conflict: the conditional impact of arms imports. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(6), 1172-1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719893446

Meier, V., Karldn, N., Pettersson, T., & Croicu, M. (2022). External support in armed conflicts: introducing the UCDP External Support Dataset (ESD), 1975-2017. Journal of Peace Research, 60(3), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221079864

Modelski, G. (1964). The international relations of internal war. In J.N. Rosenau (Ed.), International Aspects of Civil Strife (pp. 14-44). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400877843-003

Narang, N. (2015). Assisting uncertainty: how humanitarian aid can inadvertently prolong civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12151

Norrevik, S., & Sarwari, M. (2021). Third-party regime type and civil war duration. Journal of Peace Research, 58(6), 1256-1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320975819

Ogutcu-Fu, S.H. (2021). State intervention, external spoilers, and the durability of peace agreements. International Interactions, 47(4), 633-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2021.1910822

Pearson, F.S. (1974). Foreign military interventions and domestic disputes. International Studies Quarterly, 18(3), 259-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600156

Pillar, P. (1983). Negotiating peace: war termination as a bargaining process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Powell, R. (2006). War as a commitment problem. International Organization, 60(1). https://doi.org/10/fbd5s3

Regan, P.M. (1996). Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(2), 336-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002796040002006

Regan, P. M. (1998). Choosing to intervene: outside interventions in internal conflicts. The Journal of Politics, 60(3), 754-779. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647647

Regan, P.M. (2002). Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046001004

Regan, P.M., & Aydin, A. (2006). Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 736-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706291579

Reiter, D. (2003). Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspective on Politics, 1(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000033

Rosenau, J.N. (1969). Intervention as a scientific concept. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276901300201

Salehyan, I. (2010). The delegation of war to rebel organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(3), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709357890

Salehyan, I., Gleditsch, K. S., & Cunningham, D. E. (2011). Explaining external support for insurgent groups. International Organization, 65(4), 709-744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818311000233

San Akca, B. (2009). Supporting non-state armed groups: a resort to illegality? Journal of Strategic Studies, 32(4), 589-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390902987012

Sawyer, K., Cunningham, K.G., & Reed, W. (2017). The role of external support in civil war termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(6), 1174-1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715600761

Schelling, T.C. (1981). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Small, M., & Singer, J.D. (1982). Resort to arms. International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills: Sage. Sousa, R.R.P. (2015). External interventions in post-Cold War Africa, 1989-2010. International Interactions, 41(4), 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2015.1028626

Sullivan, P.L., & Karreth, J. (2015). The conditional impact of military intervention on internal armed conflict

outcomes. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214526540

Tibshirani, R. (1997). The Lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine, 16(4), 385-395. https://doi.org/10/d2km6p

Tillema, H.K. (1989). Foreign overt military intervention in the nuclear age. Journal of Peace Research, 26(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343389026002006

Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House.

Toft, M.D. (2010). Securing the peace: the durable settlement of civil wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Walter, B.F. (2002). Committing to peace: the successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Walter, B.F. (2009). Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.135301

Wittman, D. (1979). How a War Ends: A Rational Model Approach. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 23(4), 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277902300408

Bartenev, V. I. (2018). Intervention in the domestic affairs: questioning definitions. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, 10(4), 79-108. (In Russ.)

Deriglazova L.V. (2009). On question of evolution ofpartisan warship. World Economy and International Relations, 4, 95-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2009-4-95-103

Istomin, I.A. (2023). Foreign interference in internal affairs: deconstruction of an essentially indeterminate concept. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 120-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.09

Stepanova, E.A. (2010). Terrorism in asymmetrical conflict: ideological and structural aspects. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga. (In Russ.)

Stepanova, E.A. (2023). Ceasefires as a part of war, peace process, or a “no peace, no war” format. International Trends, 21(1), 43-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.1.72.6

Suchkov, M.A. (2024). Foreign interference as a form of interstate competition: types and motives. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 8-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.02

See also: