Image of regions and index of historical and cultural heritage: Altai Territory and the Altai Republic

Image of regions and index of historical and cultural heritage:
Altai Territory and the Altai Republic



Article received: 2024.02.20 21:38. Accepted: 2024.07.03 21:38


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.06.10
EDN: PYEYEF

Rubric: Russia today

For citation:

Chernyshov Yu.G., Derendyaeva A.D. Image of regions and index of historical and cultural heritage: Altai Territory and the Altai Republic. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.06.10. EDN: PYEYEF (In Russ.)


The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23-28-00822.


Abstract

Carrying out an effective image policy in modern conditions of competition between regions is becoming an important factor in the successful development of a territory's potential. However, image-forming activities in many Russian regions are still at a low level. One of the key issues is the problem of preservation and image promotion of historical and cultural heritage. In order to adequately assess and use this potential, it would be useful to develop universal methods for its evaluation. The authors attempt to develop a methodology for assessing regional images through the prism of the historical and cultural heritage of the territory. The study has for empirical basis the results of a survey of experts conducted in May 2023 by scientists from Altai State University in two constituent entities of the Russian Federation - the Altai Territory and the Altai Republic. More than half of the respondents have academic degrees; among them there are civil servants, deputies, cultural figures, journalists, museum workers, representatives of travel agencies, scientists. The results obtained were included in the Index, which took into account the ratings of different groups of regional symbols, as well as the assessments and recommendations of experts regarding the use of historical and cultural heritage. This “pilot project” of the Index contains three parts: 1) an associative series about each region; 2) ratings of historical and cultural symbols, built graphically into the “hexagon”; 3) practical recommendations and comparative analysis from experts. The article comprises three main sections; the introduction clarifies the content of the main concepts (“image”, “region”, “historical and cultural heritage”), and the conclusion summarizes the main results of the study. In general, according to the authors, the very principle of data processing during the creation of the Index has sufficiently justified itself. For each region, a clear picture was obtained that allows us to adequately assess the specifics of the situation and draw practical conclusions on how to more effectively implement image policies using the existing historical and cultural potential.

Keywords
region image, region rating, region index, divided regions, historical and cultural heritage, Altai Territory, Altai Republic.


References

Anholt, S. (2009). Branding places and nations. In R. Clifton, & A. Sameena (Ed.), Brands and Branding (pp. 206-216). New York: Bloomberg Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bhadha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

Graham, B.J. (2000). A geography of heritage: power, culture, and economy. London, New York: Oxford University Press.

Halbwachs, M. (1997). La mdmoire collective. Paris: Albin Michel.

Lumley, R. (2008). The debate on heritage reviewed. In G. Corsane (Ed.), Heritage, Museums and Galleries: An Introductory Reader (pp. 15-26). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Smith, M.K. (2003). Issues in cultural tourism studies. London: Psychology Press.

Rusen, J. (1994). Historische Orientierung: uber die Arbeit des Geschichtsbewusstseins, sich in der Zeit zurechtzuinden. Koln, Weimar, Wien: Bohlau Verlag.

Bespalova, N.N. (2010). Using the historical and cultural potential of Altai to form the tourist image of the region. The Image of the Country/Region as a Strategy for the Integration of Russia and the Asia-Pacific Region in the 21st Century (pp. 130-132). Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the All-Russian State Technical University. (In Russ.)

Chernyshov, Yu.G., & Derendyaeva, A.D. (2024). Formation of images of “reorganized regions” in the Russian Federation (based on expert surveys in the Altai Krai and the Altai Republic). Political Science (RU), 1, 155-177. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.01.06

Drozdova, Yu.A. (2021). Imidzh regiona v strategii razvitiya territorii [The image of the region in the territory development strategy]. Volgograd: Volgograd Institute of Management. (In Russ.)

Kiryunin, A.E. (2000). Imidzh regiona kak interiorizaciya kul’tury [The image of the region as the internalization of culture]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

Kolotkin, M.N. (2015). Image of Gorny Altai: searches and comparisons. Social Processes in Modern Western Siberia, 16, 119-122. (In Russ.)

Lyakisheva, V.G., & Dobrynina, I.Yu. (2017). Image of the Altai Territory: the influence of regional brands on the level of socio-economic development of the territory. Economy. Profession. Business, 4, 42-48. (In Russ.)

Nazukina, M.V. (2020). The institutionalization of ethnicity in the identity policy of Russian republics: conceptual analysis. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 78-92. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.03.06

Parhomenko, T.A. (2024). Diskursy ob istoriko-kul’turnom nasledii v sovremennom mire (XX-XXI vv.) [Discourses on historical and cultural heritage in the modern world (20th-21st centuries)]. Moscow: Institut Naslediya. (In Russ.)

Rod'kin, P.E. (2020). Brending territorij: gorodskaya identichnost' i dizajn [Place branding: urban identity and design]. Moscow; Berlin: Direkt-Media. (In Russ.)

Vasilenko, I.A. (Ed.) (2013). Imidzhevaya strategiya Rossii v kontekste mirovogo opyta [Image strategy of Russia in the context of world experience]. Moscow: International Relations. (In Russ.)

Zamyatin, D.N. (2020). Geokul'turnyi brending gorodov i territorii: ot teorii k praktike [Geocultural branding of cities and territories: from theory to practice]. St. Petersburg: Aletheya. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23681/597175

 

Content No. 6, 2024

See also:


Fedorov G.M.,
Russian Federation in the Baltic Region: Political Relations and Economic Development in 1992-2017. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No3

Simonia N.A.,
New strategic factors in the struggle for Russia’s modernization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3

Nazukina M.V.,
Regionalism in the “messages” of the heads of subjects of the Russian Federation: a discursive perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No2

Raspopov N.P.,
Socio-Political Stability of a Region - Subject of the RF. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No3

Suslov D.V.,
In the Scientific Genre of “Sociology of a Region” (Russia and the Baltic Countries: A Comprehensive Monographic Study). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991