Politicization of social ontology and its paradoxes

Politicization of social ontology and its paradoxes


Kerimov T.Kh.,

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia, kerimovt@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 150840 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2286-8412 | RESEARCHER_ID: A-9669-2019

Article received: 2024.04.04 21:16. Accepted: 2024.07.03 21:16


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.01.04
EDN: CVFLXY


For citation:

Kerimov T.Kh. Politicization of social ontology and its paradoxes . – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.01.04. EDN: CVFLXY (In Russ.)



Abstract

The article reveals the historical and theoretical prerequisites for the ontological turn in political theory and the establishment of postfoundationalism, and develops a critical analysis of its inherent paradoxes and difficulties. The ontological turn in political theory became widely known in the first decades of the 21st century. The article argues that postfoundationalism represents a reaction to the dominance of foundationalism in the social sciences, according to which politics is reduced to a subsystem of society, and the ontology of politics is reduced to the regional field of social ontology. The need to overcome foundationalism and its consequences is determined by the formation of a postfoundational political ontology of society. The latter accepts as the main principle of interpretation the position about the contingency of the foundation of society and politics and, as a consequence, about the politicization of social ontology. It is shown that an attempt to shift the meaning of political ontology encounters some difficulties. Firstly, postfoundationalism, which posits the contingency of the foundation of society and politics, falls into contradiction and reveals its dependenceon foundationalism. Secondly, the provision of contingency does not entail ethical-normative principles prescribing specific forms of politics. Thirdly, postfoundationalism entails the loss of prospects for individual positions and projects of people, the possibility of their connection with strategic issues of social development. The general thesis of the article is that renewal ontology in postfoundationalism requires historicizing the interpretation of the social and political, turning to the institutional and normative mechanisms of both the representation and the formation of political subjectivity. The argumentation of this thesis is carried out in three stages, which predetermined the structure of the article. The first part discusses the ontological turn in political theory and the motives for constructing postfoundationalism. The second part substantiates the basic principles of postfoundational political ontology. The third part explains the paradoxes of postfoundationalism and analyses their consequences.

Keywords
political ontology, sociologism, foundationalism, postfoundationalism, contingency, politics, the political.


References

Arditi, B. (2007). Post-hegemony: politics outside the usual post-Marxist paradigm. Contemporary Politics, 13(3), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770701467411

Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: feminism and the question of “postmodernism”. In J. Butler, & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists Theorize the Political (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge.

Brown, W. (2008). Regulating aversion: tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Campbell, D., & Morton, S. (2008). Introduction: Pluralism “Old” and “New”. In D. Campbell, & M. Schoolman (Eds.), The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition (pp. 1-16). Durham: Duke University Press.

Chin, C. (2021). Just what is ontological political theory meant to do? The method and practice of William E. Connolly. Political Studies, 69(4), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720925491

Connolly, W. E. (1995). The ethos of pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Herzog, D. (1985). Without foundations. Justification in political theory. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.

Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London; New York: Verso.

Laclau, E., Mouffe, Ch. (1994). Hegemony: the genealogy of a concept. In Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Toward a Radical Democratic Politics (pp. 7-46). London: Verso.

Laclau, E. (1995). “The time is out of joint”. Diacritics, 25(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/465146

Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the future. In S. Critchley, & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader (pp. 279-328). London; New York: Routledge.

Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Mihai, M., McNay, L., Marchart, O., Norval, A., Paipais, V., Prozorov, S., & Thaler, M. (2017). Democracy, critique and the ontological turn. Contemporary Political Theory, 16(4), 501-531. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0140-0

Mouffe, Ch. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.

Paipais, V. (2017). Political ontology and international political thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 114(3), 223-251.

Rosenthal, I. (2019). Ontology and political theory: a critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault. European Journal of Political Theory, 18(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116659633

Thomassen, L., & Tender, L. (Eds.) (2005). Radical democracy: politics between abundance and lack. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

White, S.K. (2000). Sustaining affirmation: the strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wiley, J. (2016). Politics and the concept of the political: the political imagination. London: Routledge.

Zizek, S. (2000). Holding the place. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Ed.s), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on The Left (pp. 308-329). London: Verso.

Zizek, S. (2008). For they know not what they do. London: Verso.

Fedorova, M.M. (2016). Ponyatie demokratii i ontologizatsiya politicheskogo: Klod Lefor [The concept of democracy and the ontologization of the political: Claude Lefort]. In M.M. Fedorova (Ed.), Politicheskoe kak problema. Ocherki politicheskoi filosofii XX veka [The Political as a Problem. Essays in Political Philosophy of the 20th Century] (pp. 125-140). Moscow: Idea-Press. (In Russ.)

Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2019). Overcoming methodological differences: the debate about knowledge politics in an age of uncertainty. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 19-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.03

Heidegger, M. (2001). Die grundprobleme Der phanomenologie. (Russ. ed.: Heidegger, M. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii. St. Peterburg: Vysshaya filosofsko-religioznaya shkola).

Kerimov, T. Kh. (2022). The “ontological turn” in the social sciences: the return of epistemology. Russian Sociological Review, 21(1), 109-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2022-1-109-130

Luhmann, N. (2007). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss Einer Allgemeinen Theorie. (Russ. ed.: Luhmann, N. Sotsial'nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii. St. Petersburg: Nauka).

Ranciere, J. (2006). Aux bords du politique. (Russ. ed.: Ranciere, J. Na krayu politicheskogo. Moscow: Praxis).

Ricreur, P. (2002). Politicheskii paradoks [The political paradox]. In Istoriya i istina[History and Truth] (pp. 287-315). St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russ.)

Smorgunov, L.V. (2020). Ontological turns in contemporary political science: in search for compliance with politics. Socialnye i gumanitarnye znania, 6(2), 122-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-2-122-133

Schmitt, C. (2016). Der Begriff des Politischen (Russ. ed.: Schmitt, C. Ponyatie politicheskogo. St. Petersburg: Nauka).

Content No. 1, 2025

See also:


Kostyuk K.N.,
Orthodox Fundamentalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No5

Levytskyy V.S.,
The philosophy of politics – political philosophy – political science: articulation of the problem area. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No1

Smorgunov L.V.,
Political identity and the concept of the political. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Kharkevich M.V.,
Overcoming the apocalypse in the pluralistic space of poetics and politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No2

Shestopal Ye.B.,
Introducing the section. The human dimension of politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No6

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991