The global power of the future:
renewal of strategic orientations of India
Nikitin A.I.,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, an@inno.mgimo.ru
elibrary_id: 637132 | ORCID: 0000-0003-3509-6893 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-6521-2015
Article received: 2024.08.08 16:04. Accepted: 2024.11.06 16:05
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.01.09
EDN: UIGPST
Nikitin A.I. The global power of the future: renewal of strategic orientations of India. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.01.09. EDN: UIGPST (In Russ.)
Largest by the size of population state of the planet India painfully perceives disbalance between its status in a world order and its own ambitions, Indian leadership coins slogans/goals before its government, business and society to obtain a status by the centenary of the independence of the not only “developed” rather than “developing” country, but more: the status of the leading world power with a global role. Searching the status of the world power in the same row with the Global North powers, India simultaneously somewhat contradictory pretends to a role of the leader of the Global South, activation girts role in G20, BRICS, SCO and other international alliances. Historical friendly ties of India with the USSR/Russia continue to have an impact onto the Indian strategy. India considers interaction with Moscow as a “specifically privileged strategic partnership”, continuously rejects from participation in the Western sanctions and anti-Russian statements, assists in overcoming of the sanction limitations. But in the sphere of security policy India reoriented itself towards partnership with the UYSA, values “anti-China” vector in QUAD and AUKJUS alignments. Strengthening of the pro-American policy collides India more and more with China, and endless repeating of the mantra on the “irreconcilability” of the Indian historic and strategic contradictions with China pushed India in direction of strategic alliance with the USA. Relations of India with Russia got somewhat contradictory character as a result of a clash between proponents of the preservation of strategic partnership, economic cooperation and friendship, from one side, and pro-Western Indian politicians and elites, from the other side, who perceive Russia through the prism of the Western accusations and sanctions, also considering Russia to be the ally of adversarial China. Regarding Ukrainian conflict India tries to claim and wage the policy of “neutrality”, zigzagging between the unwillingness to object to the West and unwillingness to lose special strategic relations with Moscow. In a process of globalization of its own horizon new dimensions of the Indian policy emerge: space policy, Arctic policy, ecological policy of building a unique “green” world power and other new orientations.
References
Gurjar, S. (2022). Russia Returns to the Indian Ocean: exploring the expanding strategic presence. India Quarterly, 78(3), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284221108256
Kumar, A. (2023). Walking a tightrope: assessing India's engagements with G20 and BRICS. India Quarterly, 79(4), 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284231203323
Sabharwal, S.S. (2023). Strategic dimensions of Sino-Pak nexus. In USI Strategic Year Book 2023 (pp. 43-50). New Delhi: Vij Books.
Sharma, B. (2023). Evolving geopolitical scenario: strategic implications for India. In USI Strategic Year Book 2023 (pp. 3-9). New Delhi: Vij Books.
Varma, V. (2023). India's strategic autonomy in an age of strategic uncertainty. In USI Strategic Year Book 2023 (pp. 10-14). New Delhi: Vij Books.
Verma, R. (2023). Multi-alignment and India's response to the Russia-Ukraine war. International Politics, 61, 954-974. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00515-y
Baranovskiy, V.G. (2019). Strukturnyye izmeneniya global'nogo miroporyadka [structural changes in global order]. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, & A.I. Nikitin (Eds.), Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Modern Political Science: Methodology] (pp. 570-591). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Fenenko, A.V. (2019). Neorealism v politicheskoy teorii [Neorealism in Political Theory]. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, & A.I. Nikitin (Eds.), Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Modern Political Science: Methodology] (pp. 61-83). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Ivashentsov, G.A. (2016). Russia-India. New formats of long-time partnership. The International Affairs, 2, 1-27. (In Russ.)
Ivashentsov, G.A. (2020). New thresholds of India. The International Affairs, 4, 74-85. (In Russ.)
Kupriyanov, A.V. (2022). Russia and India: problems and prospects for cooperation. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 63-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.04.06
Lenchuk, R.Yu. (2016). Goals and tasks of the foreign policy strategy of India at the current stage. The International Affairs, 3, 36-46. (In Russ.)
Leonova, O.G. (2022). The QUAD in the geopolitical architecture of Indo-Pacific Region. Age of Globalization, 4, 111-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2022.04.08
Leonova, O.G. (2023). India and Russia in modern geopolitical conditions: a new stage of the relationship? Russia and the Contemporary World, 2, 64-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2023.02.05
Litvak, N.V, & Tolpygin, L.I. (2016). Modern science and technology research policy in India. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 18, 29-43. (In Russ.)
Lunev, S.I. (2012). India as one of the new centers of global influence. Comparative Politics Russia, 3(2), 90-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-90-104
Martyshin, O.V. (1970). Politicheskiye vzglyady Mohandasa Karamchanda Gandi [Political views of Mohandas Karamchanda Ghandi]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Shaumyan, T.L. (2022). India at global crossroads. Svobodnaya mysl, 2, 145-155. (In Russ.)
Strelnikova, I.A., Kharina, O.A., & Nabiev, Kh.Kh. (2024). Key Interests of China and India in the Arctic and Main Directions for Cooperation with Russia. Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, 2, 72-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2024-2-72-83
Timofeev, I.N. (2019). Klassicheskiy politicheskiy realism [Classical Political Realism]. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, & A.I. Nikitin (Eds.), Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Modern Political Science: Methodology] (pp. 38-60). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Vanina, E.Yu. (2007). Proshloe vo imya budushchego. Indiiskii natsionalizm i istoriya (seredina XIX - seredina XX veka) [The Past for the Future. Indian Nationalism and History (mid-19th - mid-20th century)] In Natsionalizm v mirovoi istorii [Nationalism in the World History] (pp. 486-528). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Voskresenskiy, A.D. (2019). Regionalizm kak paradigma miroustroystva [Regionalism as a Paradigm for the World Order]. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, & A.I. Nikitin (Eds.), Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Modern Political Science: Methodology] (pp. 675-695). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Zakharov, A.I. (2020). The characteristic features of India's entry into the global world. Russia and the Contemporary World, 2, 113-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2020.02.07
See also:
Khudaykulova A.V., Ramich M.S.,
“Quad 2.0”: Quadrilateral Dialogue for Counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacific. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No3
Ilyin M.V.,
Words and Meanings: Despoty, Empire, Power. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2
Kupriyanov A.V.,
Russia and India: problems and prospects for cooperation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No4
Ide K.,
Negotiations between the U.S.S.R./Russia and China on the settlement of border issues. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3
Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A.,
Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5