Cio-Cio-san syndrome:
Asia-Pacific insecurity from the point of view of Japanese public opinion
Chugrov S.V.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, s.chugrov@inno.mgimo.ru
elibrary_id: 252110 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8307-7606 | RESEARCHER_ID: E-4747-2016
Article received: 2024.11.15 16:04. Accepted: 2023.03.24 16:05

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.04
EDN: FJTUSA
Chugrov S.V. Cio-Cio-san syndrome: Asia-Pacific insecurity from the point of view of Japanese public opinion. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.04. EDN: FJTUSA (In Russ.)
The study was conducted with the financial support of MGIMO University as part of the project No. 2025-04-03. The author also thanks Russian colleagues A.A. Baikov, A.V. Lukin, V.V. Nelidov, A.N. Panov, O.S. Pugacheva, D.V. Streltsov and Japanese researchers M. Eguchi, S. Hakamada, Yu. Hosoya, T. Inoguchi , M. Ishii, H. Kawaraji, A. Kawato, N. Shimotomai, K. Togo, for valuable advice and assistance.
The article presents an analysis of trends and constants in Japanese public opinion related to traditional and new threats in 2023-2024. At the same time, polls demonstrate an index of ‘closeness’ (sympathy) to the United States in the mass consciousness of Japanese residents that is so high (87.4%) that at first glance it defies rational explanation. To ‘disenchant’ this phenomenon, the author proposes the metaphor of the ‘Cio-Cio-san syndrome,’ appealing to the image of the Japanese ‘Madama Butterfly’, who completely surrendered to a blind passion for an American naval officer. The main research question – what are the reasons for Japan’s blind veneration of the United States – is investigated through an analysis of public opinion polls and in-depth interviews, which allowed us to conclude that the center of the new phobias and anxieties of the Japanese is a feeling of existential insecurity arising from the imbalance of the military-political situation in the Asia-Pacific region, which puts the region on the brink of a global conflict. The specifics of the security landscape in the turbulent region leave no chance for the development of genuine sovereignty in Japan’s foreign and defense policy. Japan has no other choice but to increase its support for the United States, but nevertheless, the Japanese hesitations about the reliability of American security guarantees are expressed in the form of doubts whether Washington would come to Tokyo’s aid, whether a hypothetical conflict over Taiwan would become fatal for Japan if events went according to the scenario of a proxy war in Eastern Europe.
References
Allison, G., & Hu, F. (2021). An unsentimental China policy: the case for putting vital interests first. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-02-18/unsentimental-chinapolicy
Benedict, R. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword. Patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin Co.
Buzan B., Waever O., & de Wilde J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Renner Publishers.
Chugrov, S.V., & Streltsov, D.V. (2017). Interdependence of Russo-Japanese relations and mutual images of Japan and Russia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 22-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S146810991600030X
Dobrinskaya, O.A. (2022). Japan’s approach towards quadrilateral cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. Russian Japanology Review, 5(1): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.55105/2658-6444-2022-1-5-27
Katzenstein, P.J. (1993). Coping with terrorism: norms and internal security in Germany and Japan. In J. Goldstein, & R.O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy (pp. 265-295). Ithaca: Cornell University Press,.
Kobayashi, K., & Ewejeo, G. (2021). Barriers to gender equality in Japan: moving from myth to realities. In G. Eweje, & Sh. Nagano (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Equality in Japan. Historical and Current Perspectives (pp. 13-30). Kyoto: Springer.
Leheny, D. (2018). Empire of hope: the sentimental politics of Japanese decline. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501729072.001.0001
Togo, K. (2010). Japan’s foreign policy, 1945-2009. The quest for proactive policy. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
UTokyo ROLES Survey (2024). Goroku, Ts., Iida, T., Kaji, I., Koizumi, Yu, & Nakai, R. Security, Alliance, and Foreign Engagement Research (SAFER) project. 01.10.2024. RCAST Open Laboratory for Emergence Strategies (ROLES), Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo, Japan. https://roles.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp/uploads/publication/file/130/publication.pdf
Ba, Dianjun, & Yin, Xin (2024). The evolution of the international order in Northeast Asia in the century of changes? Russian Sinology, 3, 16-33. https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2024.59.16.002
Chugrov S.V. Socio-cultural traditions and foreign policy mentality of contemporary Japan. Thesis for the degree of Dr. Sci. (Sociology) under the spec. 22.00.03. Moscow, 2007.
Dobrinskaya, O. (2023). Japan’s economic strategy in India: issues and prospects. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka, 4, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013128120027130-4
Lukin, A.V. (2024). Is the world bond to face armed conflicts around China? Russian Sinology, 3, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2024.59.16.007
Hosoya, Yu. (2013). Kokusai chitsujo. 18 seiki Yoroppa kara 21 seiki Adzia e [International Order. From 18th century Europe to 21st century Asia]. Tokyo: Chuko Shinsho. (In Japanese).
Panofu, A., & Togo, K. (2024). Gendai “senso to heiwa”. Rosia to Nishigawa sekai [Modern “War and Peace.” Russia vs. Western World]. Tokyo: K&К Press. (In Japanese).
Sato, M. (2021). Shin seiki ‘korona ato’ wo ikinuku [To survive the new century ‘post-Covid-19’]. Tokyo: Shinchosha. (In Japanese).
Tanabe, H. (2019). Zangedo to shite no tetsugaku [Philosophy as a way to repentance]. Tokyo: Iwanami Bunko. (In Japanese).
Kitamura, S. (2019). Gakatachi no senso sekinin. Fushita Tsuguhara no ‘Atsushima wo to oshite kangaeru. Kyokasho ni kakarenakatta senso [Painters’ responsibility for war: reflections on ‘Glorious Death on the Island of Attu’ by Fujita Tsuguhara. A war that was not written about in textbooks]. Tokyo: Nashi no kisha. (In Japanese).
See also:
Toloraya G.D., Torkunov A.V.,
Nuclear and Missile Threat on the Korean Peninsula: Origins and Response Measures. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4
Lukin A.L.,
Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Political Realism and Empathy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No3
Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2
Chugrov S.V.,
Mikhail Gorshkov’s experience of social diagnostics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6
Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No1