print

Theory and practice of cross-border regionalization. Lessons for Russia

Sebentzov A.B.,

Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, asebentsov@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 618867 | ORCID: 0000-0001-9665-5666 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAG-6046-2021

Lomakina А. I.,

Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Lomakina.lomakina@ya.ru

elibrary_id: 618858 | RESEARCHER_ID: J-5112-2018

Article received: 2024.08.14 19:26. Accepted: 2025.01.13 19:26


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.05
EDN: OUSNXK

Rubric: Theme of the issue: Concepts and practices of world politics – pros and cons

For citation:

Sebentzov A.B., Lomakina А. I. Theory and practice of cross-border regionalization. Lessons for Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.05. EDN: OUSNXK (In Russ.)

The article was prepared at IG RAS within the framework of a state assignment No. 124032900015-3 (FMWS-2024-0008) “Socio-economic space of Russia in the context of global transformations: internal and external challenges”.

Abstract

The article analyzes the theoretical and practical experience of cross-border regionalization at the internal and external borders of the EU. It also discusses the possibilities and basic principles of transferring this experience to Russian borders. Understanding cross-border regionalization as a multidimensional and multilevel process leading to the formation of diverse cross-border regions (CBR), the authors offer their own model of such a region. The findings show that cooperation should be launched with those elements of the CBR that have a high ability to penetrate borders and have minimal connection with political issues, especially issues of sovereignty and security. At the same time, one territory can participate in several regional projects at once, allocated according to different criteria. Consideration of crossborder regionalization through the prism of a multi-scale and multi-scalar approach allowed the authors to conclude that this process can be initiated at any level - from local to supranational. The diversity of actors, levels of government, and territorial scales creates a network of cross-border institutions that make cooperation more resilient to geopolitical conjuncture. Analyzing the experience of cooperation on the borders of the EU, including with the regions of the Russian Northwest, the authors conclude that the state and supranational bodies can initiate the formation of CBR, stimulating the imagination and activity of potential actors of cooperation through discourse and creating practices and rules of cooperation (institutions) with the help of the legislative framework, as well as special financial support programs. The combination of imagination, practice and institutions ultimately gives rise to a CBR as a social reality. To do this, it is necessary to use the mechanisms and principles of functioning of cross-border cooperation programs already implemented in the Russian Northwest with common goals and management bodies, a joint budget, common criteria for selecting projects and a program-project principle of operation. The development of such programs under the auspices of the Eurasian Economic Union would make it possible to convey to residents of the border periphery the concrete fruits of Eurasian integration and help launch the engine of “small integration” on the external and internal borders of the EAEU.

Keywords

cross-border regionalization, cross-border region, cross-border cooperation, transborder cooperation, neighborhood policy, Eurasian integration, European integration.

Agnew, J.A. (2013). Arguing with regions. Regional Studies, 47(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.676738

Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 16(4), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00226

Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2018). Exploring cross-border integration in Europe: how do populations cross borders and perceive their neighbors? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(2), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418756934

Fawcett, L. (2005). The origins and development of regional ideas in the Americas. In L. Fawcett (Ed.), Regionalism and Governance in the Americas (pp. 27-51). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Haas, E.B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: political, social, and economic forces 1950-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Harrison, J. (2006). Re-reading the new regionalism: a sympathetic critique. Space and Polity, 10(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570600796754

Hettne, B., & Soderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687778

Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in theoretical perspective. In L. Fawcett, & A. Hurrell (Eds.), Regionalism in World Politics (pp. 37-73). New York: Oxford University Press.

Jessop, B. (2003). The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions. In F. Soderbaum & T.M. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of New Regionalism (pp. 179-196). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Leveling, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: the inadequacies ofthe “New Regionalism”: (Illustrated from the case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00202

Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny, & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The State of the European Community, vol. 2 (pp. 391-410). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856540-024

Nielsen, H.D. (2021). State and non-state cross-border cooperation between North Karelia and its (un)familiar Russian neighbors. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 14(2), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-211

Paasi, A. (1999). Boundaries as social practice and discourse: the Finnish-Russian border. Regional Studies, 33(7), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078701

Paasi, A. (2011). The region, identity, and power. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.011

Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation. European Urban & Regional Studies, 10(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002004

Perkmann, M. (2007). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m

Perkmann, M., & Sum, N.-L. (Eds.). (2002). Globalization, regionalization, and cross-border regions. Houndmills; Basingstoke; Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596092

Sack, R.D. (1986). Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt-Egner, P. (2002). The concept of ‘region’: theoretical and methodological notes on its reconstruction. European Integration, 24(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330270152196

Sebentsov, A.B. (2020). Cross-border cooperation on the EU-Russian borders: results of the program approach. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 13(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-136

Sebentsov, A.B., Morachevskaya, K.A., & Karpenko, M.S. (2024). The Russian-Belarusian borderland: contradictions of integration and cross-border regionalization. From friendship to cooperation? Regional Research of Russia, 14(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523600300

Smouts, M.-C. (1998). The region as a new imagined community? In P. Le Galfes, & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Regions in Europe (pp. 30-38). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978641

Wippel, S. (2013). Conceptual Considerations of ‘space’ and ‘region’: political, economic and social dynamics of region-building. In Regionalizing Oman: Political, Economic and Social Dynamics (pp. 21-42). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6821-5_2

Wrdblewski, L.D. (2022). The integration of border regions in the European Union: a model approach. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(3), 575-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1816201

Baklanov, P.Ya. (2000). Contact geographical structures and their functions in North-East Asia. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 1, 31-39. (In Russ.)

Baklanov, P.Ya., & Shinkovskij, M.Yu. (Eds.). (2010). Transgranichnyi region: ponyatie sushchnost’, forma [Transborder region: the concept of essence, form]. Vladivostok: Dal’nauka. (In Russ.)

Fedorov, G.M., & Korneevets, V.S. (2009). Cross-border regions in the hierarchical system of regions: a systematic approach. Baltic Region, 2, 32-41 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2009-2-3

Gerasimenko, T.I., & Filimonova, I.Yu. (2011). Orenburgsko-kazakhstanskoe porubezh’e: istoriko-etnograficheskii i etnogeograficheskii aspekty [Orenburg-Kazakhstan borderlands: historical, ethnographic and ethnogeographic aspects]. Orenburg: Izd-vo Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, V.N., & Zhundubaev, M.K. (2015). Inter-regional and cross-border cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan: main priorities. National Interests: Priorates and Security, 11(7), 38-51. (In Russ.)

Karpenko, M.S., Kolosov, V.A., & Sebentsov, A.B. (2021). Transformation of the Russian-Kazakh borderland in the post-Soviet period: institutional and economic dimensions. Problems of National Strategy, 5, 25-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52311/2079-3359_2021_5_25

Kolosov, V.A., & Sebentsov, A.B. (2019). The processes of regionalization in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension program in the reflection of Russian political discourse. Baltic Region, 11(4), 76-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-5

Kondratieva, N.B. (2014). Russia - EU: cross-border cooperation outside Conjunctures. Modern Europe, 4, 33-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope420143347

Kuznetsov, A.V. (2004). Russian participation in Euroregions. Region of Cooperation, 4, 5-19. (In Russ.)

Makarychev, A.S. (2003). “Soft” and “hard” regionalism: Kaliningrad contours. Cosmopolis, 2, 81. (In Russ.)

Mikhailova, E.V. (2018). Sotrudnichestvo v transgranichnykh sistemakh na primere gorodov-bliznetsov Rossii i stran-sosedey [Cooperation in transboundary systems on the example of twin cities of Russia and neighboring countries]. Abstract of diss. ... cand. geogr. sci. Moscow: Institute of Geography, RAS.

Streletskiy, V.N. (2022). Development trajectories of border regions in the context of socio-cultural specificity and civilized identity of Russia. Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, 18(4), 3-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310022877-7

Vardomsky, L.B. (Ed.). (2023). Kaspijskij region v processah regionalizacii Evrazii [The Caspian region in the processes of Eurasian regionalization]. Collective scientific report. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russ.)

Volynchuk, A.B., & Frolova, Ya.A. (2010). Region kak forma transgranichnosti [Region as a form of transborder]. In P.Ya. Baklanov, & M.Yu. Shinkovskij (Eds.), Transgranichnyi region: ponyatie sushchnost', forma [Transborder Region: The Concept of Essence, Form] (pp. 115-130). Vladivostok: Dal’nauka. (In Russ.)

Yarovoi, G.Ya. (2007). Regionalizm i transgranichnoe sotrudnichestvo v Evrope [Regionalism and Cross-border Cooperation in Europe]. St Petersburg: Norma. (In Russ.)

See also: