Energy security community: conceptualization using the Caspian region as a case study

Energy security community:
conceptualization using the Caspian region as a case study


Aliyev R.A. ,

Doctor of Economics, MGIMO University; UNA-Russia, Moscow, Russia, torgpredaz@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 258070 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2258-3588 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAE-1140-2020

Article received: 2024.12.02 16:21. Accepted: 2025.01.20 16:21


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.07
EDN: JZHYCY


For citation:

Aliyev R.A. Energy security community: conceptualization using the Caspian region as a case study . – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.07. EDN: JZHYCY (In Russ.)



Abstract

The article explores the concept of ‘security communities' in the context of energy security, applying Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett's theoretical framework to the Caspian Sea region. The integration of Vital Energy Systems (VES) into this theory reveals the potential of energy interdependence as a foundation for building a collective identity and trust among states. Particular attention is given to the Caspian Five - Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Iran, and Azerbaijan - as the energy core of the Greater Eurasian Partnership, positioned as a key element for regional stability and integration. The analysis highlights major infrastructure projects such as the Caspian Pipeline Consortium and the Trans­Caspian Gas Pipeline, while also addressing the region's ecological challenges. Barriers to integration, including political disagreements, competition over export routes, and the absence of a unified climate strategy, are critically examined. However, the article emphasizes that strengthening institutional mechanisms and advancing joint energy projects could facilitate the development of an energy security community. The article concludes that energy security, beyond its practical dimension, serves as a symbol of collective responsibility for the region's future. Framing the Caspian Five within the context of the Greater Eurasian Partnership underscores the role of energy as a tool for regional integration, capable of fostering peace and stability amid global challenges.

Keywords
energy security, security communities, Caspian region, regional integration, vital energy systems.


References

Acharya, A. (1998). Collective identity and conflict management in Southeast Asia. In E. Adler, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Security Communities (pp. 198-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598661.006

Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (1998). Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/q0.1017/CBO9780511598661

Brown, M.A., & Sovacool, B.K. (2007). Developing a performance measurement system for energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1854-1873.

Cherp, A., Jewell, J. (2011a). The concept of energy security: beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005

Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2011b). The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(4), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001

Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualizing energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy, 38(2), 887-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039

De Vos, J.N. (2012). A security community in Africa: a critical assessment of the African Union's contribution towards the construction of a potential security community since 2002. Doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

Deutsch, K.W., et al. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area. In B.F. Nelse, & A. Stubb (Eds.), The European Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration (pp. 121-143). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jakesevid, R. (2019). Security community building in the Western Balkans-wishful thinking or an inevitable future? Teorija in praksa, 56(1), 30-309.

Johansson, B. (2013). Security aspects of future renewable energy systems: a short overview. Energy, 61, 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.023

Oelsner, A. (2015). Pluralistic security communities in Latin America. In Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security (pp. 173-184). Routledge.

Shore, S.M. (1998). No fences make good neighbors: the development of the US-Canadian security community, 1871-1940. In E. Adler, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Security Communities (pp. 333-367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598661.010

Sovacool, B.K., & Mukherjee, I. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: а synthesized approach. Energy, 36(8), 5343-5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043

Waever, O. (1998). Insecurity, security, and asecurity in the West European non-war community. In E. Adler, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Security Communities (pp. 69-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598661.003

Winzer, C. (2012). Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy, (46), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067

Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring energy security. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/20031912

Pritchin, S.A. (2018). Russia in the Caspian: the search for an optimal strategy. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Zhiltsov, S.S. (2020). Russia's Caspian strategy. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Zhiltsov, S.S., & Tulinov, B.M. (2014). Pipelines in Central Asia and the Caspian region: competition takes a new turn. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 17(3), 139-153. (In Russ.)

Zhiltsov, S., & Tulinov, B. (2023). Geopolitical transformation of the Caspian region: directions and development outcomes. World Economy and International Relations, 67(2), 130-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-2-130-138

Content No. 2, 2025

See also:


Arbatova N.K.,
Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No6

Ponamaryova A.M., Tatuntz S.A.,
Immigration as problem of national security of the RF. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

Arbatova N.K.,
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5

Sergunin A.A.,
International Security: New Approaches and Concepts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No6

Sheynis V.L.,
Russia’s national security. durability trial. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2004


Lebedeva M.M.
Problems of Development of World Politics

 The article text
 

Archive

   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991