Dominant narratives in Western media during the 1990s formation of the Responsibility to Protect

Dominant narratives in Western media during the 1990s formation of the Responsibility to Protect



Article received: 2024.10.02 18:42. Accepted: 2025.01.09 18:42


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.08
EDN: TLCWHW

Rubric: Laboratory

For citation:

Safranchuk I.A., Zhornist V.M. Dominant narratives in Western media during the 1990s formation of the Responsibility to Protect. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.08. EDN: TLCWHW


The research is funded by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 22-18-00664. The authors express their gratitude to D.N. Chernov for methodological comments and advice on data analysis during the preparation of this article, and NA Svistunov and Kh.Kh. Nabiev for their contributions to the source analysis.


Abstract

The article examines the influence of narratives of armed intervention produced by international civil society on the formation of the concept of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The article tests the hypothesis that the narratives of the most popular Western media in the 1990s were reflected in the later adopted concept of the R2P. The time span of the analyzed interventions covers the period of the R2P norm formation - the 1990s. The paper begins with an extensive analysis of the R2P concept. The analysis of the formation of the R2P concept highlights the key normative postulates of the concept, which, as shown in the article, were used to legitimize the armed interventions of Western countries in the 1990s. The article provides a detailed methodology for selecting, analyzing and evaluating sources of armed intervention narratives based on the International Military Intervention Correlates (IMIC) database. Based on the top 4 most covered interventions of the 1990s in the international media, the dominant narratives around the interventions in question (US and French intervention in the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, French intervention in Rwanda, US intervention in Haiti) are identified and analyzed. The article singles out three groups of narratives (the narrative of the necessity to defend human life, the narrative of support for democratic principles, the narrative of support for state's own/regional/international security) which later formed the basis of the R2P concept. It is noted that these narratives in the cases under consideration are used to legitimize intervention. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the so-called ‘humanitarian' narrative about the need to protect human lives.

Keywords
responsibility to protect concept, humanitarian interventions, cycle of norms, narratives, discourse, legitimation of intervention, Western media.


References

Anderson, K.F., & Brakstad, I.V. (2016). The impossibility to protect? Media narratives and the Responsibility to Protect. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 9(3), 96-115. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.3.1331

Bellamy, A.J. (2015). The responsibility to protect. Abington: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acpr of:oso/9780198704119.001.0001

Chernov, D.N., Nesmahniy, A.D, Tekin, O., & Igityan, A.A. (2023). Counterintervention success: analyzing Russian and US involvement in Syrian crisis. Comparative Politics, 14(1), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.46272/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-1-2-14-149-163

Cook, T E. (1998). Governing with the news: the news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

De Fina, A., & Tseng, A. (2017). Narrative in the Study of Migrants. In Suresh C. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Language and Migration (pp. 381-395). Abington: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-22

Deng, F.M., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D., & Zartman, W. (1996). Sovereignty as responsibility: conflict management in Africa. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: how government uses funding to keep media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131-1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724621

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organizations, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789

Grunfeld, F., & Vermeulen, W. (2009). Failures to prevent genocide in Rwanda (1994), Srebrenica (1995), and Darfur (since 2003). Genocide Studies and Prevention, 4(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.3138/gsp.4.2.221

Joshi, D., & O'Dell, R.K. (2017). The critical role of mass media in international norm diffusion: the case of UNDP human development reports. International Studies Perspectives, 18(3), 343-364.

Krasner, S.D. (1999). Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Malanczuk, P. (1993). Humanitarian intervention and the legitimacy of the use of force. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

Mearsheimer, J.J. (2019). Bound to fail: the rise and fall of the liberal international order. International security, 43(4), 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342

Papaioannou, E., & Siourounis, G. (2008). Economic and social factors driving the third wave of democratization. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36 (3), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.04.005

Wiesner, C. (2022). Doing qualitative and interpretative research: reflecting principles and principled challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372

Chernov, D.N. (2024). Intervention in civil conflicts: the balance of domestic politics and structural factors. International Trends, 22(2), 63-85. (In Russ.)

Gaman-Golutvina, O.V., Smorgunov, L.V., & Timofeeva, L.N. (2019). Development policy, national government and world order. Political Science (RU), 1, 253-267. (In Russ.)

Karaganov, S.A. (2024). An age of wars? Article one. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 52-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-1-52-64

Kikhtan, V.V., & Mamiyeva, B.U. (2018). To the question of manipulation in modern media. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2(2), 236-242. (In Russ.)

Koktysh, K.E., Sergeev, V.M., & Igityan, A.A. (2024). The cognitive trap of Rousseau's “Organic metaphor” and the construction of U.S. policy in Europe and Eurasia. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 17(5), 161-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-5-98-161-184

Maleev, Yu.N., & Larina, F.Sh. (2016). State coups and revolutions and the principle of non-interference into internal state affairs. Moscow Journal of International Law, 4, 38-49. (In Russ.)

Naumov, O.V. (2018). Traditional and new media as actors of color revolutions. Discourse-P, 15, 3-4 (32-33), 79-87. (In Russ.)

Nikitin, A.I. (2024). Sovremennye mirotvorcheskie operatsii [Modern peacekeeping operations]. In Politologiya. Novyi leksikon [Political science. New lexicon] (pp. 485-496). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Safranchuk, I.A., Nesmashnyi, A.D., & Chernov, D.N. (2023). Mobile map of perception. Russia in Global Affairs, 21(3), 90-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-3-90-102

Shakleina, T.A. (2021). New stage in the global order formation. International Trends, 19(3), 6-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.6

Simonia, N.A., & Torkunov, A.V. (2015). New world order: from bipolarity to multipolarity. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 27-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.03

Trenin, D.V. (2024). Strategic deterrence: new contours. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(4), 74-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2024.22.2.77.2

Vylegzhanin, A.N., & Dudikina, I.P. (2016). The politics of international law as a concept. Moscow Journal of International Law, 4, 21-37. (In Russ.)

Zinovieva, E.S., Chernov, D.N., Komarova, E.S., & Arov, S.A. (2023). Post-conflict phase of armed intervention. Comparative Politics Russia, 14(4), 120-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-4-14-120-135

 

Content No. 2, 2025

See also:


Rykov S.Yu., Kocherov O.S.,
The concept of humanitarian intervention in ancient Chinese philosophy and contemporary Chinese discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No6

Crowley-Vigneau A., Baykov A.A., Kalyuzhnova Y.,
Russian higher education under sanctions: a constructivist perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No4

Medushevsky A.N.,
Theory of Constitutional Cycles. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No2

Nisnevich Yu.A.,
Political responsibility: institutional way of stating the problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4

Radina N.K.,
Power in the information field of natural and anthropogenic catastrophes (on the basis of documentaries). – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No1

 
 

Archive

   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991