Dominant narratives in Western media during the 1990s formation of the Responsibility to Protect
Safranchuk I.A.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, i.safranchuk@inno.mgimo.ru
elibrary_id: 697972 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2214-6628 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-3257-2017
Zhornist V.M. ,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, verazharn@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 1107387 | ORCID: 0000-0001-7406-3192 | RESEARCHER_ID: ACC-4198-2022
Article received: 2024.10.02 18:42. Accepted: 2025.01.09 18:42

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.08
EDN: TLCWHW
Safranchuk I.A., Zhornist V.M. Dominant narratives in Western media during the 1990s formation of the Responsibility to Protect. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.08. EDN: TLCWHW
The research is funded by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 22-18-00664. The authors express their gratitude to D.N. Chernov for methodological comments and advice on data analysis during the preparation of this article, and NA Svistunov and Kh.Kh. Nabiev for their contributions to the source analysis.
The article examines the influence of narratives of armed intervention produced by international civil society on the formation of the concept of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The article tests the hypothesis that the narratives of the most popular Western media in the 1990s were reflected in the later adopted concept of the R2P. The time span of the analyzed interventions covers the period of the R2P norm formation - the 1990s. The paper begins with an extensive analysis of the R2P concept. The analysis of the formation of the R2P concept highlights the key normative postulates of the concept, which, as shown in the article, were used to legitimize the armed interventions of Western countries in the 1990s. The article provides a detailed methodology for selecting, analyzing and evaluating sources of armed intervention narratives based on the International Military Intervention Correlates (IMIC) database. Based on the top 4 most covered interventions of the 1990s in the international media, the dominant narratives around the interventions in question (US and French intervention in the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, French intervention in Rwanda, US intervention in Haiti) are identified and analyzed. The article singles out three groups of narratives (the narrative of the necessity to defend human life, the narrative of support for democratic principles, the narrative of support for state's own/regional/international security) which later formed the basis of the R2P concept. It is noted that these narratives in the cases under consideration are used to legitimize intervention. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the so-called ‘humanitarian' narrative about the need to protect human lives.
References
Anderson, K.F., & Brakstad, I.V. (2016). The impossibility to protect? Media narratives and the Responsibility to Protect. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 9(3), 96-115. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.3.1331
Bellamy, A.J. (2015). The responsibility to protect. Abington: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acpr of:oso/9780198704119.001.0001
Chernov, D.N., Nesmahniy, A.D, Tekin, O., & Igityan, A.A. (2023). Counterintervention success: analyzing Russian and US involvement in Syrian crisis. Comparative Politics, 14(1), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.46272/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-1-2-14-149-163
Cook, T E. (1998). Governing with the news: the news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Fina, A., & Tseng, A. (2017). Narrative in the Study of Migrants. In Suresh C. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Language and Migration (pp. 381-395). Abington: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-22
Deng, F.M., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D., & Zartman, W. (1996). Sovereignty as responsibility: conflict management in Africa. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: how government uses funding to keep media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131-1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724621
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organizations, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Grunfeld, F., & Vermeulen, W. (2009). Failures to prevent genocide in Rwanda (1994), Srebrenica (1995), and Darfur (since 2003). Genocide Studies and Prevention, 4(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.3138/gsp.4.2.221
Joshi, D., & O'Dell, R.K. (2017). The critical role of mass media in international norm diffusion: the case of UNDP human development reports. International Studies Perspectives, 18(3), 343-364.
Krasner, S.D. (1999). Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Malanczuk, P. (1993). Humanitarian intervention and the legitimacy of the use of force. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2019). Bound to fail: the rise and fall of the liberal international order. International security, 43(4), 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
Papaioannou, E., & Siourounis, G. (2008). Economic and social factors driving the third wave of democratization. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36 (3), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.04.005
Wiesner, C. (2022). Doing qualitative and interpretative research: reflecting principles and principled challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372
Chernov, D.N. (2024). Intervention in civil conflicts: the balance of domestic politics and structural factors. International Trends, 22(2), 63-85. (In Russ.)
Gaman-Golutvina, O.V., Smorgunov, L.V., & Timofeeva, L.N. (2019). Development policy, national government and world order. Political Science (RU), 1, 253-267. (In Russ.)
Karaganov, S.A. (2024). An age of wars? Article one. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 52-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-1-52-64
Kikhtan, V.V., & Mamiyeva, B.U. (2018). To the question of manipulation in modern media. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2(2), 236-242. (In Russ.)
Koktysh, K.E., Sergeev, V.M., & Igityan, A.A. (2024). The cognitive trap of Rousseau's “Organic metaphor” and the construction of U.S. policy in Europe and Eurasia. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 17(5), 161-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-5-98-161-184
Maleev, Yu.N., & Larina, F.Sh. (2016). State coups and revolutions and the principle of non-interference into internal state affairs. Moscow Journal of International Law, 4, 38-49. (In Russ.)
Naumov, O.V. (2018). Traditional and new media as actors of color revolutions. Discourse-P, 15, 3-4 (32-33), 79-87. (In Russ.)
Nikitin, A.I. (2024). Sovremennye mirotvorcheskie operatsii [Modern peacekeeping operations]. In Politologiya. Novyi leksikon [Political science. New lexicon] (pp. 485-496). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Safranchuk, I.A., Nesmashnyi, A.D., & Chernov, D.N. (2023). Mobile map of perception. Russia in Global Affairs, 21(3), 90-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-3-90-102
Shakleina, T.A. (2021). New stage in the global order formation. International Trends, 19(3), 6-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.6
Simonia, N.A., & Torkunov, A.V. (2015). New world order: from bipolarity to multipolarity. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 27-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.03
Trenin, D.V. (2024). Strategic deterrence: new contours. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(4), 74-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2024.22.2.77.2
Vylegzhanin, A.N., & Dudikina, I.P. (2016). The politics of international law as a concept. Moscow Journal of International Law, 4, 21-37. (In Russ.)
Zinovieva, E.S., Chernov, D.N., Komarova, E.S., & Arov, S.A. (2023). Post-conflict phase of armed intervention. Comparative Politics Russia, 14(4), 120-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-4-14-120-135
See also:
Rykov S.Yu., Kocherov O.S.,
The concept of humanitarian intervention in ancient Chinese philosophy and contemporary Chinese discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No6
Crowley-Vigneau A., Baykov A.A., Kalyuzhnova Y.,
Russian higher education under sanctions: a constructivist perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No4
Medushevsky A.N.,
Theory of Constitutional Cycles. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No2
Nisnevich Yu.A.,
Political responsibility: institutional way of stating the problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4
Radina N.K.,
Power in the information field of natural and anthropogenic catastrophes (on the basis of documentaries). – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No1