.jpg)
printThe problem of Russian voters' perception of democratic values in the context of attitudes to the West
Feoktistov N.M. ,
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, feonikita1298@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 1279387 |
Article received: 2024.10.31 19:37. Accepted: 2025.01.09 19:38
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.09
EDN: ORTGLC
Rubric: Laboratory
For citation:
Feoktistov N.M. The problem of Russian voters' perception of democratic values in the context of attitudes to the West. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.02.09. EDN: ORTGLC (In Russ.)
Abstract
This article critically examines the prevailing discourse surrounding Russian political culture within the context of modern Russian history. A prominent strand within this discourse posits a “genetic” predisposition of Russian voters towards authoritarianism. However, the author argues that this assumption is unfounded, citing the rich empirical evidence provided by the analysis of election campaigns at both the federal and regional levels. These campaigns demonstrate a more nuanced and dynamic political consciousness among Russian voters, characterized by fluctuations between openness and democracy on the one hand, and a more closed, authoritarian orientation on the other, depending on the historical context. The author emphasizes that while attitudes towards the West - whether perceived as friendly or hostile - significantly influence political consciousness, they do not constitute the sole determinant. Furthermore, the article criticises the tendency to assess the quality and development of democratic institutions in Russia solely through the lens of Western standards. Such assessments, the author argues, often rely on simplistic and mythologized assumptions about Russian political culture. The author concludes that the primary focus for Russia's future development should be the cultivation of authentic and “original” democratic traditions within Russian society, independently of its relationship with the West.
Keywords
political culture, authoritarianism, democratic institutions, election campaigns, archetypes, historical cycles.
References
Colton, T.J., & McFaul, M. (2003). Popular choice and managed democracy: the Russian elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Makarenko, B, & Melville, A. (2015). How do transitions to democracy get stuck, and where? In A. Przeworski (Ed.), Democracy in a Russian Mirror. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy (pp. 268-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Almond, G.A., & Verba, S. (2014). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. (Russ. ed.: Almond, G.A., & Verba, S. Grazhdanskaya kul'tura. Politicheskie ustanovki i demokratiya v pyati stranakh. Moscow: Mysl').
Bakunin, M.A. (1989). Gosudarstvennost' i anarkhiya [Statehood and anarchy]. In Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politika [Philosophy, sociology, politics] (pp. 291-526). Moscow: Pravda.
Baranov, N.A. (2015). Political culture of Russia: traditions and modernity. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture, 208, 203-213). (In Russ.)
Gel'man, V.Ya. (2012). The rise and decline of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Polieia, 4, 65-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2012-67-4-65-88.
Guseinov, A.A. (2008). Demokratiya dlya Rossii, Rossiya dlya demokratii [Democracy for Russia, Russia for democracy]. In Demokratiya dlya Rossii — Rossiya dlya demokratii [Democracy for Russia — Russia for Democracy] (pp. 51-56). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS. (In Russ.)
Montesquieu, Ch. (1974). De l'esprit des loix. (Russ. ed.: Montesquieu, Ch. O dukhe zakonov). https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Monteskye_O%20dukhe.pdf
Nisnevich, Yu.A., & Ryabov, A.V. (2017). Post-Soviet authoritarism. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 4, 84-97. (In Russ.)
Pivovarov, Yu.S., & Fursov, A.I. (2001). “Russian system” as an essay of grasping Russian history. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 37-48. (In Russ.)
Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. (2004). Russia is a normal country. Russia in Global Affairs, 2. (In Russ.) https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/rossiya-normalnaya-strana/
Surkov, V.Yu. (2006). Natsionalizatsiya budushchego [paragrafy pro suverennuyu demokratiyu] [Nationalization of the future [paragraphs about sovereign democracy]]. In Suverennaya demokratiya: ot idei k doctrine [Sovereign Democracy: From Idea to Doctrine] (pp. 27-44). Moscow: Evropa. (In Russ.)
Content No. 2, 2025
See also:
Merloe P.,
Electoral Campaigns and Pre-Election Issues: The Level Playing-Field and Democratic Elections. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No4
Gelman V.Ya.,
Election Campaigns in Russia: Electoral Formula on Trial. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No2
Fedotova V.G., Fedotova N.N., Chugrov S.V.,
Culture, Institutions, Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No1
Wallerstein M.,
Election Rules, Parties and Political Stability. – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No6
Semenenko I.S.,
Evolutionary cycles and problems of forecasting political changes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1
.jpg)
.jpg)
