.jpg)
printPower as a dialogue or dialogue without any power? To actual aspects of G.H.Mead’s political philosophy
Potseluyev S.P.,
Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science, Institute of Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, Southern Federal University, spotselu@mail.ru
Rubric: Subdiscipline: Political theory
For citation:
Potseluyev S.P. Power as a dialogue or dialogue without any power? To actual aspects of G.H.Mead’s political philosophy . – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No. 1
Abstract
The article inquires into actual aspects of G.H. Mead’s theory of political communication. Attention is drawn to the reflective process of mutual role-taking as basic element of Mead’s concept of conversation. Correlation of political dialogue and functional power in Mead’s concept is clarified in the article. Then the perspectives of global dialogue are analyzed from the positions of Mead’s theory of civil self-government. The author reflects on the role of unequal partners’ dialogues in the making of universe dialogue.
Content No. 1, 2010
See also:
Ratz M.V., Kotelnikov S.I.,
G.P. Schedrovitsky’s ideas in Russian socio-political thought (in commemoration of the 85th anniversary). – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3
Levytskyy V.S.,
The philosophy of politics – political philosophy – political science: articulation of the problem area. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No1
Inoguchi T.,
Political theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3
Menshikov A.S.,
How to theorize politics?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1
Kozhokin E.M. ,
Aleksander Solzhenitsyn and Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
.jpg)
.jpg)