Mediatory institutions and their development in contemporary Russia. Part II. Think tanks and public policy centers

Mediatory institutions and their development in contemporary Russia. Part II. Think tanks and public policy centers


Sungurov A.Yu.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, Head of Department of Applied Political Science, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, asungurov@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 615464 |

Raspopov N.P., rnp@uic.nnov.ru

Belyayev A.Yu., belazzbelazz@rambler.ru



For citation:

Sungurov A.Yu., Raspopov N.P., Belyayev A.Yu. Mediatory institutions and their development in contemporary Russia. Part II. Think tanks and public policy centers . – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No. 4



Abstract

Continuing the set of publications that is supposed to retrace the development, in contemporary Russia, of institutions carrying out mediatory functions, this article addresses to diverse types of think tanks and public policy centers – in the cases of Moscow, St-Petersburg and Nizhniy Novgorod. The subjects treated – in a comparative perspective – are, in particular, history of their formation and their relations with the authorities and with civil organizations. As the authors conduct the analysis, they point to the decrease of public centers’ activities during the first decade of the new century and, besides, dwell on the difference of the patterns of think tanks’ development in Moscow, on the one hand, and in St-Petersburg and Nizhniy Novgorod – on the other.

Keywords
think tanks; centers for public policy; public policy; mediating institutions; society and power; regional political regimes.


Content No. 4, 2012

See also:


Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N.,
Estimation of effectiveness of public policy institutions in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5

Sungurov A.Yu.,
Expert community, think tanks and power: experience of three regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2

Miroshnichenko I.V., Morozova E.V.,
Network Public Policy: Outlines of Subject Field. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2

Sungurov A.Yu., Raspopov N.P., Glukhova E.A.,
Mediator institutes and their development in contemporary Russia. III. Ombudsman institute. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Belyayeva N.Yu.,
Evolution of the concept of public policy: attention for «motive forces» and for governing entities. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2003


Pantin I.K.
So What Does the Russians’ Choice Consist In?

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991