Political responsibility:
institutional way of stating the problem
Nisnevich Yu.A.,
Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, Department of Political Science, National Research University Higher School of Economics, nisjulius@gmail.com
Nisnevich Yu.A. Political responsibility: institutional way of stating the problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No. 4
Under consideration is the way the problem of political responsibility is treated. In due course, find their definition individual subject and collective subject of the political responsibility during the stage of conquering political power and the stage of its execution. Analyzed then are essential characteristics of the political responsibility as it is proper to politicians, to elected and appointed political functionaries within political power, and to electors, as well as to parties, to political institutions of public power, and to citizens’ associations. Measures and mechanisms of compulsion to political responsibility are evaluated – such, for instance, as appointment by election and removability – according to results of elections – of political functionaries of public power and civil control of the latter’s activities.
See also:
Nisnevich Yu.A.,
Public power and corruption: socio-anthropological approach. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No6
Glushkova S.I.,
Individual, group, collective and general rights under the conditions of multiculturalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N.,
Estimation of effectiveness of public policy institutions in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5
Bezvikonnaya Ye.V.,
Systemico-Synergetic Model of a Political System. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Miroshnichenko I.V., Morozova E.V.,
Network Public Policy: Outlines of Subject Field. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2